Was The Mad Men Twitter Takedown Part Of An Advertising Strategy?
from the reverse-streisand? dept
We've talked about the concept of a reverse Streisand Effect, where a company purposely pretends to be outraged and demands to take something down in order to generate more attention for it, and now there's some evidence suggesting that last week's DMCA takedown notices for the "fake" Mad Men Twitter accounts may have been part of AMC's own marketing strategy. Buried at the bottom of a NY Times article about what happened, there's a hint that the whole thing was planned out, as following a request from the Times reporter, Brian Stelter, to one of the "fake" users for an interview, that character "referred all questions to Deep Focus, a Web marketing agency that works for AMC."






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Why "reverse"?
Not really important, just curious.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Streisand Effect
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
DMCA Abuse?
While there might not be any direct harm done here, it does bother me that the same media organizations that aggressively use DMCA -- in ways that often undermine fair use -- would then turn around and use DMCA mechanisms in a patently fraudulent way for the sole purpose of generating free publicity.
There should be a way to punish companies that play these sort of games with the DMCA.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Deep Focus
They were already mentioned in the linked article in your previous post about this (8/26/08)
Supposedly, Deep Focus "encouraged" AMC to rescind their take-down assault.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DMCA Abuse?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DMCA Abuse?
I suspect that this business process has already been patented.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
BTW The story revolves around a PR firm so I doubt some of the marketing nuance of a Streisand effect is not lost. Although it is set in 1960 before this interweb thing came along.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Deep Focus
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Deep Focus
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Good Show . . .
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Mad Men
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment