Internet Poker Lobby Setting Up Tables At Both Conventions

from the upping-the-ante dept

The US's odd decision to effectively ban online poker as part of a national security law has never made much sense, other than as yet another paternalistic move by the government deciding what is and is not okay for you to do in the privacy of your own home. Some claim that the online poker ban is due to lobbyists from the offline casino industry, who don't like the competition -- but there's little evidence to support that. First of all, the offline casinos have talked about how they'd like to get into the online game themselves, but cannot due to this ban -- and it's quite likely that making games like poker more popular via online competitions would increase foot traffic to offline casinos as people who believe they've become experts online venture out to real world casinos.

Either way, it seems that the folks in favor of legalizing online poker are getting increasingly sophisticated in their lobbying efforts. Last year, they sent representatives to lobby in DC, and this year they're setting up actual poker games at both major party political conventions, trying to drive home the point that playing poker shouldn't be a crime. The article also notes that the lobbyists have started their own Political Action Committee as well, called PokerPAC, which has already raised some cash. Apparently, the poker players are getting serious about calling Congress' bluff on online poker.

17 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    USians Don't Want To Lose Face

    identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 2:05am

    Legalizing online gambling would mean conceding that Antigua was right. Somehow I can't see that happening any time soon...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Re: USians Don't Want To Lose Face

    identicon
    wasnt me!, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 3:46am

    dude Antigua IS right

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Online poker

    identicon
    Dan Morency, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 4:02am

    Just what we need yet another way for people who can not afford to gamble to flitter away their money. After they are broke the rest of us get to pay higher taxes to support the "poor souls" who just "can't make it no matter how hard they try"

    The only real winners are the game operators

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: #3 Online poker

    identicon
    ScaredOfTheMan, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 4:32am

    yea, but the same can be said of how people spend what little money they earn on alcohol and tobacco.

    I don't play poker online, but its very difficult to find a logical explanation as to why they ban it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Online poker

    identicon
    pawn, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 4:58am

    @ Dan Morency: That's a dumb reason for a ban. Those people already flitter away their money.

    Lots of people enjoy gambling as entertainment. For me, it's like going to see a movie (Except I make money at poker).

    And you can find lots of people who spend their money poorly. Lots of people go into credit card debt buying music, movies, video games, consumer electronics, clothes, shoes, etc.

    I work with a girl who cannot get out of debt because she buys designer handbags.

    Should designer handbags be banned? Of course not. To me, restricting how I spend my money is as offensive as taking it through taxes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    I vote

    identicon
    Thom, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 5:00am

    that next time around we set up Russian Roulette tables at the conventions. Then we might make some progress, lol.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  

    Re: Online poker

    icon
    PaulT (profile), Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 5:04am

    You're a fool if you think people don't already do this illegally.

    Besides, online gambling is legal in most other countries and there doesn't seem to be a massive increase in gambling problems. In fact, online casinos in the UK market legally have to promote safe gambling, give players the option to block themselves if they feel they have problems and help problem gamblers (http://www.gambleaware.co.uk/customer-protection/responsible-gambling-measures).

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  

    Re: Online poker

    identicon
    Eliot, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 7:34am

    A fool and his money are soon parted.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  

    It's more about funding than playing

    identicon
    DMo, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 8:03am

    With the exception of a very few state laws (I think Indiana is one example), there is no law against *playing* poker online -- nobody has been prosecuted for being "caught" playing online poker. The recent UIGEA legislation only forbids US financial institutions, including credit card companies, from processing transactions used to fund or payout online gambling accounts, which makes it a lot harder to play online for real money. There are plenty of ways around it, however, and there are many poker sites that still support US players. I know, because I have accounts at several. Which just goes to prove that you can pass restrictive legislation all you want, but the people that really want to do (or profit from) something will always find a way to make it happen. Drugs, guns, gambling, et al. So the government would be wise to regulate and tax online gambling rather than attempt to ban it entirely. There may be lots of legitimate reasons, such as public safety, to legislate certain activities, but a perception of "morality" should never be one of them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  

    Re: It's more about funding than playing

    identicon
    Will, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 9:04am

    Ok, so you work around this to play. That's great as long as you lose money, or win small amounts, as most the vast majority of people do. Your money finds its way to them with no problem. You're even ok if your one of the few that win large amounts playing with a 100% honest company.

    What happens when you win a big pot and the company refuses to pay? No matter what their excuse your only hope at getting your money is to pray you can raise enough of a stink that they fear it'll cost them more. You can't, in any way shape or form, hope to sue them and win because you deliberately circumvented the law to play and they would have to deliberately violate the law to pay.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  

    Re: I vote

    identicon
    Scott, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 1:13pm

    Finally, a comment that makes sense. I'm glad someone else out there sees the similarity between playing internet poker and Russian roulette. Online gambling is way more like a game where the loser dies with a gunshot wound to the head than the in-casino gambling games on which it is based.

    We just need to mobilize the gun/Bible toting rural Americans to keep down those snotty jerks with their fancy-pants college educations and indoor plumbing. If those guys take over the country, everything will soon go to Hell. Well, the last 8 years have been great for our cause. Keep the faith, brother!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  

    Re: Re: I vote

    identicon
    Paul, Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 2:55pm

    I thunk he'un was sayin we otta clean dat dar govment o' ourn up by riddin we sevs o' mosta dem dar ko-rupt politacal type folk. I be'in glad yo straiten me out. Thank much, bro.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  

    Probably a Control Issue

    identicon
    John, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 5:17am

    It is likely that this is a US government 'people control' issue, the same as the so-called drug war.
    As for people flocking to real casinos after playing online, it is unlikely that they would have any money left with which to place a bet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  

    Legislating Morality

    identicon
    WK, Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 2:14pm

    Regardless of what people say and do, the laws regarding online poker in the US are ridiculous: they are, like Prohibition, a simple attempt to legislate morality. Eventually, these laws will be scrapped after people find out that they don't work.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  

    Online poker Legislating

    identicon
    Davis, Sep 5th, 2008 @ 2:07pm

    hi this is Davis.I love Poker so much and i enjoyed your blog thoroughly.Nice Blog.Enjoyed it.
    There are plenty of ways around it, however, and there are many poker sites that still support US players. I know, because I have accounts at several. Which just goes to prove that you can pass restrictive legislation all you want, but the people that really want to do (or profit from) something will always find a way to make it happen
    ----------------------------------------------
    Davis.


    http://www.CelebPoker.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 8th, 2008 @ 4:44pm

    I've been playing poker for over six decades, and I know whereof I speak, there's no such thing as an honest on line poker site.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  

    megaupoad downloading

    identicon
    rendom, Dec 22nd, 2008 @ 12:14pm

    Tired of finding the file through enormous amount of searchers? 1 center- 1 enter for Megaupload files downloading at http://megaupload.name/

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This