Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   TSA GUY, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 2:19pm

   
   

   Clear

   Clear is subsidized by the taxpayers so "special" people can cut to the front of the line.
   This isn't fair to the other taxpayers in the long line.
   There is no way 100 a year covers background checks and extra security lines for the clear people.
   Call your congressman and dump this crap now!

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 2:50pm

   
   

   What difference does it make?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Jason, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 2:55pm

   
   

   Re: Clear

   Actually, a background check costs about $15.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   Chris, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 3:48pm

   
   

   Re: Clear

   While I agree it should not be subsidized, I didn't think less than $12/month could only be affordable to "specials." I'm piss poor, but if I traveled alot I would budget it in. Seems like the subsidy helps keep it affordable for "less than special" people. Otherwise it would be like the disparity between the price of coach to the price of 1st class. Take the subsidy away and it might only be for the rich in the long run.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   Chris, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 3:49pm

   
   

   Re: Re: Clear

   *EDIT* I meant less than $10/month

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Don, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 4:01pm

   
   

   Good Idea, very very very bad execution..

   I was a clear member when they were first rolling out the program. They promised me the Clear lanes would open at the San Jose airport on a specific date. When there were delays, they refused to extend my membership and I actually never used my card. I was ripped off by CLEAR and would never recommend this program to anyone. Oh, BTW... I keep getting renewal offers from clear and it's $128.00 for the first year (not $100 as the article states).
   
   Now... it's a great idea to have an idea of who to filter out of your system. The system as it stands now is horribly flawed and I have heard news reports of people on the list can't get off, people who've been openly critical of the system being somehow on the list, and I'm sure there are people not on the list who should be. Now watch, I'll be on the list next.
   
   We take our shoes off at the airport as part of a knee-jerk reaction, we finally can leave our laptops in their bags and we can't take but a thimble full of fluids with us... and the list goes on. It's a major disaster and probably should be scrapped so we can begin anew.
   
   

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Beta, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 4:24pm

   
   

   As I understand it, Clear is NOT a pre-screening or "trusted passenger" service: if you're a member you still have to pass the metal detector and X-ray machine like everyone else, it's just that you get to use the "members only line" (which is probably less crowded) and maybe you have valets helping you with your bags. It's a matter of convenience, not security.
   
   Therefore, two points spring to mind: 1) There is no good reason to require applicants to supply sensitive personal information to apply, it's just more of the knee-jerk "we want all your information" thinking (which leads to bad security). And 2) so what if somebody applied in Weinberger's name? Depending on how stupid Clear's own security is, it's either a membership that no one can use, or one that Weinberger can use for free.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   Howard_NYC, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 5:19pm

   
   

   Q: if they cannot guard a laptop, how can they protect an airport?

   Q: if they cannot guard a laptop, how can they protect an airport?
   
   the deal was, citizen would trade comfort for safety... and know we have neither...
   
   if TSA keeps this or any other vendor capable of such a knucklehead play, there should be terminations of senior managers...
   
   the C-levels at the vendor should be asked to step down -- today

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   Cynic, Aug 11th, 2008 @ 5:59pm

   
   

   Amazing, I didn't know the technology existed to tell whether information was copied off a laptop's hard disk. Maybe there's a tiny little odometer on each byte and they read all the odometers and they were the same.
   
   So there's something I don't know about, or they're lying through their teeth.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    VMD, Aug 12th, 2008 @ 6:14am

    
    

    How did they win the bid?

    This story really makes me wonder how TSA screens and picks contractors. Is there a bid competition? What are the criteria? It does look like TSA needs to rethink this process. Perhaps a major overhaul of TSA itself may be a good start.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    known coward, Aug 12th, 2008 @ 8:39am

    
    

    i bet mohhamad atta

    would have enjoyed the convenience of this program.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    Overcast, Aug 13th, 2008 @ 8:33pm

    
    

    Amazing, I didn't know the technology existed to tell whether information was copied off a laptop's hard disk. Maybe there's a tiny little odometer on each byte and they read all the odometers and they were the same.
    
    So there's something I don't know about, or they're lying through their teeth.
    
    Yes, very true. And even if something was in place to track that on the OS running on the laptop, it's not hard to boot it with a CD with Linux on it, mount the file system in read only mode and copy away. They couldn't reliably prove that no data was copied. Actually, the smartest of thieves may have well swiped it, copied needed data and put it right back where they found it.
    
    Hey - question - could they be sued for 'making available' the data? :) Why not? The RIAA seems to think so.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    

    David@Used laptops, Jan 12th, 2009 @ 1:42am

    
    

    Security is a problem.

    What ever ways are invented toprotectcomputer codes the faster the guys learn to break the codes.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    

    Cheap computers Canada, Sep 16th, 2009 @ 12:04pm

    
    

    Maybe there's a tiny little odometer on each byte and they read all the odometers and they were the same.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment