Italy Makes 'Deliberately Getting On TV' A Crime?
from the please-explain-the-reasoning dept
With all the new laws being proposed to try to deal with people committing stupid crimes with the sole intention of getting "famous" on YouTube, it seems fair to ask if the laws themselves make sense. However, some seem to be taking such laws even further. Reader Dave writes in to point out that Italy appears to have outlawed deliberately getting yourself on TV. The law was targeted at a prankster who's made quite a career for himself disrupting TV newscasts in order to promote condoms. He's (amazingly) been able to do this 20,000 times. You can understand why this might be frustrating -- but you would also think there would be other laws to deal with this. Instead, this new law sounds very broadly written, as you could get arrested for it even if you appear on TV and are "silent and immobile." So, simply standing behind a TV reporter during a newscast could now put you in prison in Italy. Something doesn't seem right about that.
22 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Network TV Execs Discover What Pirates Always Knew: Making Stuff Available Online Is Good Marketing
- Study Confirms: News Networks Owned By SOPA Supporters... Are Ignoring SOPA/PIPA
- Dear Pro Sports Leagues: Can I Watch The Game Please?
- Hint: If You Commit A Crime, Do Not Google Every Aspect Of It Afterwards
- Spanish Court Reverses Course: Says Linking To Infringing Material Is A Crime





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It's not a law..
(a dozen of people don't need to move to block a train or to interrupt any other public service)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
ahh the irony
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not a law..
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
there's worst
In the last few weeks and in the next few ones, press will be denied the right to inform people (about accadiments in court of law), judges will be denied the right to investigate (by the abolition of wiretapping for so called "light" crimes like political bribery), citizens will be denied the right to sue big companies with class actions and army will be called to patrol the streets.
Please, help us!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Brilliant
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Gov't sucks
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Disturbing...
Something about that doesn't scream "reliable" to me.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
So...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not a law..
As for newscasts are a public service?
riiiight, any "news" that relies on advertising is suspect by principal alone, let alone the rest of it.
Think of it this way, today's news is "dumbed down" to the point it will attract viewers stupid enough to actually buy the products advertised. Neat huh?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
BabaBooey BabaBooey BabaBooey BabaBooey BabaBooey
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
20,000 times?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
one more thing ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not a law..
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Gabriele Paolini is crap anyway... ;)
That said: Gabriele Paolini is an idiot; not sure whether he is someone with any mental health issues or if he does all this intentionally. He once appeared during a BBC correspondence from Italy advertising the url for his own porn site. He was even sentenced for that site depicting him and other people in sexual acts. Also, while many times he has appeared promoting condoms, some other times he was saying "Viva il Papa" ("hurrah for the Pope", when John Paul II was Pope) and I saw him one time screaming some assorted nonsense at a few politicians, like "Berlusconi assassino, Pannella pedofilo!" (now I certainly am not a fan of Berlusconi, but I have no idea while he was calling him "assassin" or why did he think that old radical party leader Pannella was in his opinion a "pedophile")...
Sorry for the long text; I was just meaning to say: Paolini is certainly not reliable as a condom or anti-AIDS campaigner/supporter...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Does this include politicians campaigning? If so - I'd be all for it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's not a law..
riiiight, any "news" that relies on advertising is suspect by principal alone, let alone the rest of it.
Think of it this way, today's news is "dumbed down" to the point it will attract viewers stupid enough to actually buy the products advertised. Neat huh?"
.. You realize the irony of saying something like that on a news website supported by advertising...right? Pardon me, I see a Google Ad I need to go click...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Disturbing...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Existing laws should be good enough...
It ought to have civil penalties, not criminal ones, unless the actual acts were de facto disturbing the peace, in which case again, the existing law should be good enough.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment