Making Content Convenient Creates More Value Than Locking It Up
from the time-is-money dept
Megan McArdle sings the praises of Amazon's digital media strategy, noting that she can now get her music, movies, TV shows, and books all from one company and have them all neatly organized and made available to her. Amazon's digital store is convenient because it remembers which content she's purchased and allows her to re-download any of it on demand from anywhere (Update: Some readers are pointing that while you can re-download Unbox movies and Kindle e-Books, you can't re-download music from Amazon's music store. My apologies for the error.). That means that she doesn't have to worry too much about preserving individual media files; she just needs to remember her Amazon ID and Amazon takes care of the rest. One thing she doesn't note, though, is that while the MP3s are DRM-free, the Kindle books and Unbox videos are still crippled with DRM. That means that if she ever decides she dissatisfied with Amazon's service, there may not be an easy (or legal) way to take her content with her. And precisely because she's putting all of her digital eggs in one basket, it will be particularly painful if she ever needs to switch services. As nice as some of Amazon's services are, I'm not personally willing to subject myself to that degree of lock-in.
Megan's observation also illustrates what's wrong with the common argument that DRM is required for subscription services. It is often claimed that without DRM people would just subscribe to a service for one month, download all the content they wanted, and then cancel. But this ignores the fact that people's time is valuable. Most people don't want to waste a lot of time organizing, transferring and backing up their content. I think Megan is pretty typical in wanting a single place in the cloud to store all of their media. If the price of a subscription service is reasonable, most people will find it more convenient to just stay subscribed and download content as they need it. Of course, you'll have a few people who play the download-and-cancel game, but a lot of those people would probably have downloaded their files from BitTorrent anyway, so it's no great loss. And at the same time, ditching DRM creates a lot of new value because it eliminates compatibility headaches and gives customers the peace of mind of knowing they can switch if they ever need to.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
but... wrong on so many levels
It just looks like a rather generic nothing special misguided blog post.
(Also, I cannot "re-download" the music I have previously purchased from Amazon..)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: but... wrong on so many levels
What does it matter who the person is? The importance is the message, which is what Tim discusses.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
re download....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Steam?
ie: http://www.shacknews.com/laryn.x?id=17264012#itemanchor_17264012
Just curious, I am kind of on the fence of the issue.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Kindle
If the price got dropped to under a hundred bucks I'd jump on it in a heartbeat.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No Re-Downloads
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Kindle
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The down side, however, is their files are DRMed, and you have to have a player that supports their particular file format. Admittedly, it's a huge drawback (unless you have a means for converting the files to a different format *cough*).
The fact that every file you've purchased is always there is nice; now if they could just improve the performance of their site so it's not painfully slow with a couple hundred files...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
See, I don't get this argument
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment