Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Silly Pandering indeed!

   

   Jeremy M, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 8:25am

   
   

   This just goes to show you the fusses these groups get into to seem bigger than they really are.
   
   Personally, I don't care about Google's Privacy Policy. Why? They've given so much to us (myself being a user) and NOT spammed their users with third party stuff. There's no reason not to expect them to hold fast to their high level of trust between them and their user base.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Much ado

   

   about nothing, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 8:28am

   
   

   While I agree this is silly pandering with little real benefit to the consumer I fail to see why Google doesn't simply add a link to avoid the bad publicity. A single link next to the three already on the home page
   (Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - About Google)
   won't clutter the page nor detract from the user experience.
   
   It is silly for these groups to take a shot a Google for not displaying some meaningless eye-candy and it is just plain stupid for Google to dig its heels in on such a minor tweak to the home page.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 8:33am

   
   

   If I were looking for Google's privacy policy I might think the "About Google" link on their front page would be a good palce to start. And I'd be right. It's right there at the bottom.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   What's a privacy policy

   

   Michael Sherrin (profile), Jun 4th, 2008 @ 8:47am

   
   

   The even silly question to ask is how many people read privacy policies, no matter where they are (aside from lawyers looking for someone to sue?).

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Shift of focus?

   

   Suman Bolar, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 8:50am

   
   

   The privacy policy is one page in, logically (and clearly) placed in the "about google" section. In terms of branding, a huge part of Google's initial appeal was that it broke away from the clutter of other search engines of the time (yahoo, infoseek, et al) and gave us a clean page that let us do what we were there to do (search) without clicking off at tangents. How about focusing on consistent enforcement of stated privacy policies instead of nitpicking about placement?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Much ado about nothing

   

   Melvillain, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:03am

   
   

   What is this obsession with privacy? Are people just now aware that they are shouting out their personal information every time they go online? You're right Mike, it's not about where their privacy policy is posted but, what they do with our info. The internet operates on a public trust that our personal information won't be abused. I agree, that's an a--load of trust but, so far it's all we have.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:05am

   
   

   if a privacy policy can't be found, does it really exist?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   I recall

   

   bobbknight, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:07am

   
   

   Was it not Google that told the Feds to Fuck Off when the feds came looking for information?
   I trust Google more than the ACLU.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   As if it really mattered..

   

   Tim, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:22am

   
   

   They already added it to the links at the bottom of the page. Problem solved.......now go away!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    Nothing better to do?

    

    Yakko Warner, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:23am

    
    

    What the heck is the ACLU doing getting involved in this? What civil liberties are being violated here?
    
    Although Google could easily shut them up by putting a link on the home page (and their reasoning for not doing so is pretty silly; it wouldn't add *that* much clutter to their page, not any more than is already there), there is absolutely nothing wrong with where the link is now.
    
    Can Google sue for defamation for these groups trying to make a public spectacle out of this non-issue? If they think a law has been violated, let them take Google to court, where they can attempt to explain to a judge how clicking "About Google" and "Privacy Policy" is too hard.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Bored and have nothing to do....

    

    Zabi, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:37am

    
    

    I tell you, these people have nothing else to do. this shows how useless all these groups are. just looking for tiney detailed and useless things to make our lives a living hell... these are the people why coffee cups have a warning on them " contents may be hot"
    and if someone wants to read the damn policy... just google it and it pops up in front of you......
    
    by the way, i use iGoogle and it's right there at the bottom of the page saying.... "privacy policy".

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    Monarch, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:39am

    
    

    There is a link for Google's Privacy Policy on my personal Google Home page. Not sure if it has ever been there before, but it is now. Never looked for it in the past

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    Re:

    

    Kevin, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:42am

    
    

    If I were looking for Google's privacy policy I might think the "About Google" link on their front page would be a good palce to start. And I'd be right. It's right there at the bottom.
    
    Hmm...if I'm at www.google.com and I want to see their privacy policy, what might be a good way to SEARCH for it? Oh, I know. How about googling the words "google privacy policy"? I don't know what's so hard about that.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    Its there

    

    Ummm, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:52am

    
    

    now

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    Re: Its there

    

    Oops, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 9:52am

    
    

    now, on igoogle.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    Google "Google Privacy Policy"

    

    Jim, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 10:11am

    
    

    Presumably someone using Google could manage to search for "Google Privacy Policy." Not surprisingly, it's the first link returned. Perhaps the EFF and ACLU lawyers need a tech tutorial. I will note, there is a link to the privacy policy at the bottom of iGoogle pages.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

17.  

    He who will fool me at play, will fool me any way...

    

    Clueby4, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 10:16am

    
    

    I'm not sure, if you can't even get them to put the frelling link on the front page. Then I seriously doubt you can get them to agree on more important things.
    
    The issue is being blown up by google not anyone else, put the link out there and don't get lippy about "creativity" or "clean" home pages. As if; Advertising Programs, Business Solutions, or that filthy copyright symbol doesn't already soil the precious home page.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

18.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 10:19am

    
    

    Anyone that signs up for an online email account with their real name is retarded. And also to search anything while logged into that email account on their search engine.
    
    Wise up folks.
    
    Butte Muncher

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

19.  

    iGoogle

    

    Jeff, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 10:21am

    
    

    What are they talking about? I use iGoogle's homepage feature and at the bottom, TA-DA! A privacy policy link!
    
    I mean, I understand that it's not on the classic home page, but really, is it that hard to find? Let's find out. Hmm, let's see... Oh! 'About Google'... *click*... THAR IT IS! Google isn't trying to hide anything. I guess we just have some lazy people is all...

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

20.  

    mission creep

    

    claire rand, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 10:23am

    
    

    if they put the 'privacy policy' link in.. how long before someone decides they need a home page link for say their 'equal opportunities' policy? or their environmental policy?
    
    googles home page works because there is so little on it
    ffs leave it alone

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

21.  

    Liar or Moron?

    

    John D, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 11:12am

    
    

    From the article:
    
    'Ms Givens, of Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, said: "I went through the exercise of finding [Google's] privacy policy and it's not easy. It's not intuitive and it's not a couple of clicks. You have to work at it.'
    
    And yet, I was able to get to it in three clicks. (About Google -> Privacy Policy -> Google Privacy Policy).
    
    It's one thing to say you don't agree with the way a company does something, but why does this woman feel the need to lie about it to make her point?
    
    Pathetic!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

22.  

    little details

    

    brazel, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 11:42am

    
    

    Everyone else has a privacy link on their home page, what's the big deal? Maybe Google is allergic to privacy, or even the word "privacy".

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

23.  

    Re: Much ado

    

    Jed, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 2:02pm

    
    

    I once read in a magazine interview with Google that adding a short sentence to their home page cost them many millions of dollars (I forget how many) in bandwidth costs per day. A HTML link like privacy policy would be nearly the same size in bytes.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

24.  

    I agree...but...

    

    Eric Goldman (profile), Jun 4th, 2008 @ 3:01pm

    
    

    Mike, you're right (as usual) that the drumbeat on this topic is wasteful showboating. However, from my perspective, the real villains are the politicians who have legislatively mandated that websites put specific words on their home pages regarding privacy. It's never good when politicians try to control user interfaces. On the other hand, it's completely fair game for the advocacy groups to identify companies who aren't complying with the law and push for compliance. (I'm not saying Google isn't in compliance, but clearly the privacy groups think so). Eric.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

25.  

    Fortune and glory

    

    John, Jun 4th, 2008 @ 3:09pm

    
    

    To take a quote from an Indiana Jones movie, it sounds like this issue is about "fortune and glory".
    
    All of the "privacy companies" will gain "glory" (actually "notoriety") and bragging rights because they were the ones who "forced big bad Google to do what we want".
    
    It's very telling that they go after a fairly small issue (where to place a link on a site) rather than the larger issue of auditing sites to make sure they follow their own privacy policy. But, which issue is easier to handle and which will bring them "we beat Google" bragging rights faster?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

26.  

    Actually, I do care

    

    Dan Houser, CISSP, etc., Jul 3rd, 2008 @ 9:30am

    
    

    Does this matter about Google? Not if they're the only ones who aren't compliant. However, I actually review and use privacy policies, and they really do matter. Clear and conspicuous is law for a reason... without it, we would never be able to have an idea what their privacy stance is. I'm not deluded enough to believe it's a guarantee, but it is a legal contract, and a strong indicator of their privacy beliefs.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

27.  

    Re: Re: Much ado

    

    Dan Houser, CISSP, etc., Jul 3rd, 2008 @ 9:32am

    
    

    Doesn't pass the bologna test. You're asking me to believe that 150 bytes would create nearly $1 BILLION change in telco charges. Completely unbelievable.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment