Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  John Tolbert, May 30th, 2008 @ 6:46am

  
  

  T-Mobile

  Hmm, I have used T-Mobile for many years but now wonder if they are worth it. Seems they ae trying to overstep their bounds.
  
  JJ
  http://www.fireme.to/udi

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ben, May 30th, 2008 @ 10:15am

  
  

  Re: T-Mobile

  They surely are overstepping their bounds. I think they know that most of their users will never see any stories about this trademark bullying, though, and so they're not worried about it.
  
  It does make me wonder how long I'll be using their service though!
  
  http://textrapolate.com/

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  DS78, May 30th, 2008 @ 6:52am

  
  

  Really?

  Since when can you trademark a color? That's ridiculous...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ima Fish, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:06am

  
  

  Re: Really?

  Kodak has a trademark on that putrid orange they use. John Deere has a trademark on the green they use. I know it's asinine, but it's the law.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:28am

  
  

  Re: Re: Really?

  And you wonder why some people don't respect our government and the "laws" we have.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Annonymous, May 30th, 2008 @ 8:39am

  
  

  Re: Really?

  Since always - believe it or not... The shade of BLUE that the NYPD USE TO OWN, for their cars could not be copied - car companies are(were) not allowed to paint a single car that color... Lately, NYC has changed colors and now the blue is merely a stripe on a white car...
  UPS BROWN - They claim that if the shade of brown can be copied - people will fall victim to fraud as well as robberies... There are a few more color copyrights... but these came to mind...
  
  NYPD BLUE
  FIRE ENGINE RED
  UPS BROWN

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  James, May 30th, 2008 @ 6:54am

  
  

  Hey!!

  I have trademarked and copywrited black text! Pay me!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Manuel H, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:11am

  
  

  Re: Hey!!

  Sorry James, this is not black, is #333333

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Bob Bobbers, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:28am

  
  

  Re: Hey!!

  I reviewed your patent, because I own a similiar one. Your patent is limited to using black with Arial text. You used my black text patent to show your improvement. Mine was black text using Chinese characters and english characters. So you only get money when they use Arial. so technically they owe me.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  DS78, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:16am

  
  

  Re: Re: Really?

  Here's the two things that get me. First, is that ability to trademark a color. Not as it applies to your logo, business etc. but just a color. Second, color is subjective. Not subjective by opinion, but by perception. People see color differently.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  CraigSager'sToupee, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:32am

  
  

  corona santiago

  my old high school had to pay the miami dolphins for use their specific shade of teal. trademarking a color shouldn't be allowed.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:34am

  
  

  there is a difference between John Deere green and T-mobile magenta. Deere has been around for ever and its a may to mark their product once its out in use. so others who see it in a field or a yard will know instantly its a Deere. the t-mobile color is just for advertising media, not actual product.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, May 30th, 2008 @ 7:34am

  
  

  Except they didnt trademark a color, they trademarked a specific color for a specific type of product in specific areas.
  
  If I want to make T-Mobile magenta lawn tractors, or open a cell phone company whose logo is John Deere green I can.
  
  Also - color might be subjective, but you will see all products with T-Mobile magenta the same, regardless of whether you and I see it the same.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Buzz, May 30th, 2008 @ 8:21am

  
  

  Attacking the color???

  Do they own one shade? Or do they own a range? I'm gonna open up my software company, take the T-Mobile magenta, offset the hue or saturation by 1, and tell the judge I'm not using the same color. :P

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  colorblind, May 30th, 2008 @ 8:24am

  
  

  How in the HELL can you trademark a color?
  
  That's it, I'm trademarking the friggin moon, so anyone who looks up has to pay me.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, May 30th, 2008 @ 8:29am

  
  

  Someone should trademark the word Magenta, then sue TMobile for using it in their brand book and legal documents.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  www.custompcmax.com, May 30th, 2008 @ 8:36am

  
  

  This is unbelievable that a company would actually try to sue for this sort of thing. Especially when the people they are suing are in completely different markets. I am sure I can find a store/company that uses a very similar color green that John Deer uses, yet they don't sue for that sort of thing. It would be a feasable arguement if the companies they were suing were other cell phone companies that used the same exact color AND a similar design. Way to go T-Mobile... show us your true colors. They say any publicity is good publicity... BUt, I don't think that is the case here. It shows you are a greedy and ruthless company, and most informed people try to stay away from that. Good luck to you! LOL

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, May 30th, 2008 @ 9:14am

  
  

  Re:

  Can you say service master!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  James, May 30th, 2008 @ 9:25am

  
  

  Nothing wrong w/trademarking a color

  Plenty wrong with your idiot legal team trying to coherse those who use the same color in a NON-related business model,.. or a different shade. Grow up.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  MLS, May 30th, 2008 @ 9:43am

  
  

  T-Mobile

  Just to be accurate, T-Mobile has not obtained a trademark on a color. What it has registered is a logo in which one of its constituent elements happens to be magenta in color. Even a novice practicing trademark law knew that T-Mobile was on the losing side of an argument.
  
  By the way, there are a few trademarks limited to color, but those are almost impossible to secure and require compelling evidence that the color is intimately ingrained in the minds of ordinary consumers for the goods with which the color is used that consumer confusion is likely as to the source of the goods. Perhaps the best known is the one held by Owens-Corning for insulation that is colored pink. Like I said, these are quite rare and generally quite limited in scope.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  dijital, May 30th, 2008 @ 11:07am

  
  

  Astounding

  When you think of it in the most basic terms, T-Mobile are effectively attempting to stop any use of any material that reflects light of a particular wavelength in advertising.
  That's just absurd...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  mike allen, May 30th, 2008 @ 11:10am

  
  

  mike

  you say you hope they learn their lesson mmmmm want to bet!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  wasnt me, May 30th, 2008 @ 11:39am

  
  

  makes me wonder who will come up with a patent on patents?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment