City Council Tells 'Dumbest Criminal' To Stop Posting So Much Evidence To YouTube

from the give-the-cops-a-challenge,-man dept

We've been mocking various attempts to get laws passed that would make it illegal for criminals to post evidence of their crimes on YouTube. This makes absolutely no sense -- as you're basically telling criminals "stop giving us the evidence we need to convict you." If the criminals are so dumb as to hand over such evidence, shouldn't the police and gov't officials be happy about it? Now, in a rather extreme example of this, the city council for Leeds, in the UK, has banned a man they refer to as one of the city's "dumbest criminals" from posting any more evidence to YouTube. In fact, the City Council even seems to recognize how helpful the guy has been: "He has handed us the evidence against him on a plate. In the last three years, we have seen a 32 per cent reduction in crime in Leeds. If more criminals were as obliging, the city would be even safer." So why would you ban him from uploading such evidence?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), May 22nd, 2008 @ 7:14am

    Interesting.... Just as you say, the order is not "stop committing crimes" but "stop posting evidence of your crimes into the public arena so we can use it against you with no additional effort". Maybe the police are bored and need something to do.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Alex, May 22nd, 2008 @ 7:36am

    Probably because the government realises that if people are uploading videos of crimes to youtube, then youtube is probably the reason they're committing the crimes. I mean, the attention they get for it

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 22nd, 2008 @ 7:57am

      Re:

      Probably because the government realises that if people are uploading videos of crimes to youtube, then youtube is probably the reason they're committing the crimes. I mean, the attention they get for it

      So, as long as the criminal is getting "attention", it must be a bad thing? This guy wants attention, and the legal system is giving it to him. Period. Why is this so much different than the news, other than no work has to go into getting the information, the guy is essentially turning himself in. Motivation behind self incrimination doesn't matter so long as it's not coerced, so why should we stop him?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Evil Mike, May 22nd, 2008 @ 8:32am

        Re: Re: Tards

        If the person is already a criminal (ie Law Breaker) why the hell would they even deign to notice a law forbidding the posting of incriminating evidence online?

        Which side of these two (criminal/law-maker) is more ignorant, retarded, or just plain lacking in logical reasoning?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 23rd, 2008 @ 9:23am

          Re: Re: Re: Tards

          It doesn't matter if a law-breaker ignores a ban on incriminating himself, actively discouraging him from incriminating himself is dumb.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    yeah, May 22nd, 2008 @ 7:59am

    yeah

    I agree with Alex. Its like girls gone wild. yes they are tramps, but sans the cameras, they wouldn't be flashing.

    Don't give these idiots a stage.

    On the other hand, being able to nail them for multiple crimes gets you more plea bargains, which is guilty verdicts, and greases the skids of the courts.

    It most likely wont change anybody's life.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      PaulT (profile), May 22nd, 2008 @ 8:14am

      Re: yeah

      No, the stage is good. These kinds of people would be career/petty criminals anyway (note that drugs and theft seem to be the main crimes this guy's committing, not just the driving offences uploaded to YouTube). If they're stupid enough to make a public record of their crimes to begin with, let them and get them off the street ASAP.

      @Alex: no. Don't blame the technology. I'm from the UK, I've known a lot of idiots like this in the past (pre- and post-internet). It's the localised culture of the scum who populate council estates and slums, not the internet, that creates this kind of crime and criminal. As with many stories in the last couple of days, don't confuse the increased visibility of a type of crime with increased incidents of it happening.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 23rd, 2008 @ 9:26am

      Re: yeah

      Nah, the girls would still find a way of flaunting themselves, you just wouldn't have it recorded on tape. Same with criminals: no one commits a crime solely to post a video about it; you commit a crime because you want to commit the crime, and getting 'fame' is just gravy. Don't discourage that, as it helps you get them for the actual crime.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nobody, May 22nd, 2008 @ 8:10am

    Atleast...

    Atleast they make good video's!!! Still, I think it's like Paul say's, the cops were afriad of something else doing their job for them...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Overcast, May 22nd, 2008 @ 8:28am

    Maybe they are afraid of being outsourced to a call center overseas... heh

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Come on, May 22nd, 2008 @ 8:57am

    how bout forget the ban, and put this guy in jail, and then guess what... he cant upload these videos anymore. Kind of killing two birds with one stone.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    SuperSparky, May 22nd, 2008 @ 9:05am

    Keeps postiing???

    Typical UK solution to crime.

    Why is this guy not in prison? Do they just keep slapping him on the wrist (in typical British fashion) and let him go?

    Learn the concept of "punishment before rehabilitation". Maybe if he was actually punished for his crimes, he just might reconsider doing them again. Also, the more he does, the more severe the punishment.

    Typical, make a law and expecting a law-breaker to keep it. Now I know why my Grandmother emigrated from that place.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    freakengine, May 22nd, 2008 @ 9:36am

    Wow...

    I smell a union. I can foresee the day when the police unions hire people to commit crimes so they can continue to employ what are essentially legions of roving tax collectors.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ben, May 22nd, 2008 @ 10:43am

    Getting Attention is an issue

    When I was in high school my friends and I would pull big mischievous stunts (rearranging a teachers class room after hours - we climbed through the window) partly for the attention we'd get at school the next week.

    So yes, I think part of the reason the city would want to ban these actions is so that other people don't get ideas... and so the criminal doesn't get his kicks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Chronno S. Trigger, May 22nd, 2008 @ 10:53am

      Re: Getting Attention is an issue

      You put your stunts on youtube?

      I know I didn't. I pulled my stunts to get a laugh from my friends. Let's make a law banning friends.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    TravisO, May 22nd, 2008 @ 10:55am

    So what's his YouTube user account?

    I won't lie, now I want to see his videos. Not because I want to see crime, but to see how outrageously obvious the acts appear to be illegal or not.

    Did he break into people's house and rob them on video? Did he even wear a mask? Did he beat somebody up on video?

    I guess my want to see them adds fuel to this imaginary fire the government wants to put out. But really, I just want the whole story.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nate, May 22nd, 2008 @ 11:02am

    I am sure this guy was just doing stupid pranks and recording them. Maybe they think if he doesn't have an audience, he won't do stupid stuff to begin with. But, on the other hand, there are many other video hosting sites out there, so I doubt it will effectively do anything. Plus, all he needs to do is set up a Youtube account at a different IP address with a different name and he will be back online. Stupid criminals, stupid government officials...

    http://www.custompcmax.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Mr. Joke Killer, May 22nd, 2008 @ 1:05pm

    This is soo bad, even I don't try to joke about it....

    This sounds like, "Hey, here's another law to break so we can charge you with more crimes."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 22nd, 2008 @ 2:10pm

    "He has handed us the evidence against him on a plate. In the last three years, we have seen a 32 per cent reduction in crime in Leeds. If more criminals were as obliging, the city would be even safer." So why would you ban him from uploading such evidence?

    Why? Because the government lives on fear and when the crime rate goes down people are less fearful. And if criminals post evidence of their crimes on the net it might make some people wonder just how much money the police really need to catch them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This