File Sharing Pre-Settlement Letters In Europe Get Lawyer Banned For Six Months
from the extortion-not-appreciated dept
Earlier this year, we wrote about how common it was becoming for companies to send out "pre-settlement" letters to people they haven't yet accused of a crime. While these are well-known for groups like the RIAA, they're also used by big retailers and were famously used by DirecTV against anyone it thought might have been stealing satellite TV. The letter basically demands an upfront payment to get the company not to sue. And, of course, the letter includes all sorts of threatening legalese about how going to court will be expensive and time consuming, suggesting that it's much easier to just pay up. While these "extortion-lite" letters in the US grow in popularity, it looks like folks in Europe aren't so willing to let them pass. A lawyer representing Logistep, a company that has recently run into trouble in both Italy and Switzerland for its tactics in trying to sniff out file sharers, has been banned from practicing law for six months by the Paris Bar Council. The lawyer had been sending out these types of letters demanding 400 euros not to sue, and the Paris Bar apparently felt this was rather problematic. Somehow I doubt we'll see the same sort of thing happen in the US any time soon.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Extortion Illegal?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extortion Illegal?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Extortion Illegal?
Hey, I'll take "unable to earn income in this line of work for half a year"-- for a first offense of this type of misrepresentation.
However it does looks like this lawyer was pocketing the money. They should have offered a deal...offer full reimbursement to the victims or face a fine in range of “hundreds of thousands of euros”, and if necessary, seek to "gain the amount by the sale of [the lawyer's personal] goods”
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
What happened to lawyers?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Ha Ha
When was this, because I haven't seen this in my lifetime.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm, I wonder what prompted you to make this remark?
I would love to make a few guesses, but that would mean a flame war.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Court precedent?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
And when was that? Lawyers have been always about how to make the most $$, or I should say, How to "get" the most $$! In the world of today - They should be shot on site
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
We don't have to guess what your occupation is.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That would be a stark violation and if reported would result in large fines to the practice and offending companies. By turning them in the person would get 10-25% of the fines.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
when men were real men...
Those were the dark ages when lawyers were attorneys and legal disputes were settled with swords. An attorney (from tournament) was a knight-champion you hired to fight in your defense. Those days are long since gone, having died out alongside chivalry and epic quests.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment