Army Sets Up Phishing Scam To See How Gullible Service Members Are
from the and-here's-the-list-of-folks-not-to-give-sensitive-info-to dept
Well, since Japan leaked nuclear secrets via a P2P site, perhaps it's nice to know that our military runs its own phishing tests to see how gullible service members are. Slashdot points us to the news that the Army ran its own phishing scam, emailing members with an offer for free tickets to theme parks if they just went to a website and filled in certain information. The test itself was set up by the U.S Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) and U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command (NETCOM) -- and it involved a "fake" website supposedly from Army Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Command (Family and MWR). Amusingly, it appears that INSCOM and NETCOM didn't bother to tell the folks at Family and MWR that they were conducting this test, so the group had rushed out an announcement warning people away from the fake site, only to later be clued in by the security folks. Oh well, it still seems better than using Dungeons & Dragons as a test of whether army members are security risks.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
My congressman will get a strongly worded letter with pareto chart and venn diagrams contrasting bullshit to taxpayer monetary responsibility tomorrow.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
While you're at it
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Again I admit it wasn't what they we're trying to test.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
how much did this cost?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: how much did this cost?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
To Eric Z...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
waste? no, not really.
Well done, Army!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: waste? no, not really.
No. They intended to test the recipients of the e-mails, not Family/MWR.
Well done, Army!
A screwed up test and you say "well done"? The army should be insulted that you think they need praise even when they screw up as if though they couldn't meet any higher standard.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
waste of money?
The test may not have given the results that they were looking for, but having a preconceived notion of results is completely against the scientific method anyhow.
In the end there were significant results and probably a good lesson learned. That sounds like a success story to me.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Gullible?
*ducks and covers*
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
no comment about other two the over zealous groups
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Not a new idea
http://phishme.com/
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Call me old fashoned but...
It just seems wasteful to have the same activity run 3 times over by 3 separate groups.
Heh.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment