Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Against Citizen Journalism Site

from the safe-harbors-strike-again dept

Back in November of last year, we wrote about a citizen journalism site in Vermont that was being sued for content posted on the site. As we noted at the time, it seemed quite clear that the site itself was protected by section 230 of the CDA, which provides a safe harbor for sites, preventing them for being liable for content contributed by users. It would appear that a judge agrees and has dismissed the lawsuit, citing the safe harbor provisions of the CDA. Another victory for falsely blamed sites.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Second sentence.

    identicon
    Jeremy, Apr 1st, 2008 @ 4:30am

    "Protection" should be "protected."

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Agreed

    identicon
    Greg, Apr 1st, 2008 @ 5:18am

    I was about to say the same thing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Lawyers should know better

    identicon
    Mike, Apr 1st, 2008 @ 8:03am

    Why are there so many Lawyers willing to take these cases, knowing they're going to get tossed out, making them selfs look like nothing but ambulance chasers (so to speak). Has the money become that good, that its worth their reputation...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    A lawyer Reputation

    identicon
    jack Sombra, Apr 1st, 2008 @ 8:11am

    "Has the money become that good, that its worth their reputation..."

    The day a lawyer passes the bar his reputation is equal to that of a carnivorous turd

    Some, after many years of hard work, honesty and integrity become human beings worthy of respect, while the majority remain remain somewhere on the scale between the turd and shark

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Second sentence.

    icon
    Mike (profile), Apr 1st, 2008 @ 8:43am

    Oops. Fixed. Thanks.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: A lawyer Reputation

    identicon
    mike allen, Apr 1st, 2008 @ 8:49am

    How dare you call lawyers turds or sharks I will see my lawyer to consider suing you for defamation and libel against turds.
    everyone knows their is not a thing on the planet low enough to describe lawyers. (and estate agents)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This