Comcast Tests DVR That Watches You... Literally

from the some-things-don't-need-cameras dept

Broadband Reports points us to the news that Comcast has been experimenting (internally only) with putting cameras into DVRs in order to determine who and how many people are watching. Comcast lays out the reasons why this might be useful -- such as recognizing if a child is watching, so that child content filters are automatically turned on, or merely recognizing certain preferences based on who's watching. However, the creepiness factor of such an offering is quite high, and I doubt many people would be comfortable with such a camera -- especially coming from a company like Comcast that's been getting blasted for its traffic shaping efforts. Besides, it will be too tempting for marketers to avoid misusing such a technology. Nielsen, for example, has been trying to come up with all sorts of ways to figure out if people are really watching commercials or TV shows, or if they just leave the TV on and are doing something else. Think how tempting it would be to "spy" on people to get a sense of what they're really doing. If such a system was going to work, the homeowner would need to have full control over the camera. If it acted just like a computer webcam, with the individual having full control over how it was used and how it could be accessed, then people might be more comfortable with it (plus, conceivably it could open up the ability for people to do video chat via their TVs). But if it's sending any info back to Comast, it's going to make people exceptionally uncomfortable.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 9:22am

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    lavi d (profile), Mar 21st, 2008 @ 9:35am

    I wonder how many people would sign up for this if it meant getting reduced prices on cable and/or a few premium channels thrown in for free?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 9:49pm

      Re:

      I wonder how many people would sign up for this if it meant getting reduced prices on cable and/or a few premium channels thrown in for free?

      I would! Why not? I don't have anything to hide. Only people with something to hide would oppose this and those people need to be exposed anyway,

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MLS, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 9:38am

    Cameras

    Are people actually being paid to come up with such hairbrained schemes?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 9:56am

    Knock money off the bill and people will take it. After a while, they're used to it and it becomes standard. You get the camera or you don't get cable.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:03am

    Can't you just put a blocker (TAPE) in front of the video camera eye?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:11am

    what do you think thier already doing with the new digital tv's that you need to have by 2009, v-chip anyone ?

    v= voyeur

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:21am

    It's only a matter of time before the government gets backdoor access into the cameras. Then, literally, we will have 1984. If the choice is between having the camera in my house and not having TV... well TV, it's been fun. Also, even if (although I don't believe it for a second) they don't use this to let the government watch you, they're going to use it to charge you more money based on how many people are watching something at your house. Hey, does that PPV event normally cost $49.95? Well, you've got 15 people at your house. Looks like it's going to cost you $749.25 now, assho - I mean, valued customer!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:27pm

      Re:

      We won't "literally have 1984", we'll figuratively have 1984. I don't think you understand the meaning of the word literally.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        inc, Mar 22nd, 2008 @ 1:22am

        Re: Re:

        damn for real.. but what if they see some neked dude? plus there is an easy fix for it; black tape over the lens.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 22nd, 2008 @ 12:54pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          damn for real.. but what if they see some neked dude? plus there is an easy fix for it; black tape over the lens.

          Anyone who would do that obviously has something to hide and should be relentlessly investigated until their crimes are uncovered. "Alternative interrogation methods" might even be needed until they confess.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:33am

    there are many feeling running through my head after reading this article, but coming from comcast, surprise is not one of them.

    In 2 years we'll find out they've been getting $10,000 a pop for an un-warranted living room surveillance of "suspected terrorist".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    You've been Punk'd.....courtesy of Comcast, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:40am

    What about the content this DVR camera may pick up? Bedroom DVRs etc? Will the DVR get a show rather then showing one? This is a horrible idea, the government would tap it, with some excuse, and privacy in our homes is gone. Comcast, you really have sunken to a new low..... I want to WATCH TV not be on it. I wouldn't even get this if you can "shut it off", they still have control, I would want not want this feature, unless i could but blind on the camera... but whose to say there isn't a second.. or maybe they already have them installed?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Shane, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:46am

    Webcam in DVR

    You have got to be kidding me, i cant stand comcast and their traffic shaping already , now you want to eyeball what is going on inside my home...

    Drop the crack pipe and step away!@

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    BinaryWorld, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:48am

    Bad Idea

    This is a horrible idea, but notice how they (Comcast) quickly justify it by using the "think of the children" gimmick. As others have said, we're living in 1984.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    WarOtter (profile), Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:57am

    In a strange twist...

    In Soviet Amerika, television watches YOU!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    David Frier, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 10:58am

    Aluminum Foil!

    No, not for a hat. Just a square of it to tape over the openeing where the lens is....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 11:01am

    This is bullshit that they are even pondering the idea.

    I honestly wouldn't be surprised if this camera wasn't in cable boxes already.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 11:13am

    Yeah, better check this one out with Snopes...Be realistic, who would monitor the feed and/or recordings? But then again, who knows, maybe this will create a demand for employees and this will pull us out of this resucktion.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Richard Ahlquist (profile), Mar 21st, 2008 @ 11:18am

    Well your DVR already

    tells them that you watch what you watch. It shouldnt be too hard to figure out that your kid is the one watching Barney unless youre some perv into plushies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  

    What about those of us who watch tv in the nude...

    That goes way beyond privacy, say you hop out of the shower, or change clothes in front of the tv, and mr comcast employee is getting a free show...

    If that's the case we should charge them for watching us, since we got to pay to watch their 'content'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 11:36am

    This Would Be Cool!!!

    I would dance naked in front of it and smear poop all over my body!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 11:36am

    This Would Be Cool!!!

    I would dance naked in front of it and smear poop all over my body!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Joe, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 12:14pm

    sweet

    its a cool way to break in peoples houses... they need a microphone as well... that way i can watch if they leave a purse or wallet in the living room... break into the house ( listen if there's a security system of course ) then steal the goods...

    I mean, the camera is always on. I know if the TV is off or on or hasn't been touched for a while.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Scott Spinola, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 12:20pm

    Would not accept this if they paid me

    If they gave me free cable for life and actually paid me on top of that they couldn't get me to accept this. Anyone who accepts this nonsense into their living room deserves every privacy violation they get as a result.

    The fact that they have control of the cable/DVR box in my home would make irrelevant any consumer privacy controls they might offer.

    I agree with the earlier poster. Who comes up with this nonsense? Maybe this is a hoax, but would anyone be surprised if it wasn't?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Shane, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 1:44pm

      Re: Would not accept this if they paid me

      I agree whole heartedly. Sad truth is if comcast offered substantial savings to camera customers as part of "marketing research" then a large percentage of "middle" people a.k.a short sighted, short memoried, drone americans would sign up.

      Then its only a matter of time before the majority of privacy oriented people would become the minority and you would have to opt out of standard, country-wide entertainment to preserve your privacy.

      Its amazing how slight pressure over a long period of time can sway public opinion and concern.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Rob (profile), Mar 21st, 2008 @ 12:40pm

    I promise you...

    That I would never watch TV with my pants on again. I wonder what filters that would automatically turn on...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Tim F, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 12:45pm

    This is why i'd want a Linux box running MythTV so i wouldn't have to deal with this stupid shit. Comcast really belives its customers are ignorant ass-hats if they think they'll go for it.


    And it wouldn't surprise me, if some do. But for me, no thank you!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    SENIOR TECH Alex Seeley, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 12:52pm

    Senior Tech says "NO!!"

    I am the Senior Technician for the 2nd largest cable company. (Second to Comcast) . We are considered to be "the most trusted provider". We will also end up being the largest provider if Comcast continues with these bold attempts to invade privacy

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jay, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 1:35pm

    filters

    such as recognizing if a child is watching, so that child content filters are automatically turned on

    I find it very disturbing that everyone feels they need to play the parent. It is the parent’s job to monitor and filter what their children watch not the cable companies. Next they will be telling me I cannot watch certain shows past 10 because they feel I should be in bed sleeping.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nick Nack, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 1:39pm

    Watch and be watched, or do not watch at all?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jason, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 1:44pm

    Screw technology

    It's time for people to pack up and move to the hills. Get away from the modern world and embrace the way life in this country was supposed to be...alone and free with nobody watching.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    ComcastCares, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 1:46pm

    Comcast Response

    The newteevee.com article "Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You" portrayed some assumptions that require correction and clarification. I want to be clear that in no way are we exploring any camera devices that would monitor customer behavior.

    To gather information for this article, the blogger picked up on a conversation between Gerard Kunkel and another person at a recent conference. They were discussing the various input devices offered by a variety of vendors that Comcast is reviewing.

    The camera-based gesture recognition device is in no way designed to - or capable of - monitoring your living room. These technologies are designed to allow simple navigation on a television set just as the Wii remote uses a camera to manage its much heralded gesture-based interactivity.

    We are constantly exploring new technologies that better serve our customers. The goal is simple - a better user experience that allows the consumer to get ever increasing value out of their Comcast products.

    As with any new technology, we carefully consider the consumer benefits. In fact, we do an enormous amount of consumer testing in advance of making a product decision such as this. We're confident that a new technology like gesture-based navigation will be fully explored with consumers to understand the product's feature benefits - and of course, the value to the consumer.

    Frank Eliason
    Comcast Executive Offices

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 2:30pm

      Re: Comcast Response

      Yeah - right ...
      cough cough
      This will not be abused at all.
      Trust us, no - really.

      Dude, you need a strong dose of reality.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      realist, Mar 28th, 2008 @ 4:41am

      Re: Comcast Response

      Look, they told us the same line about how the microphones in the cable boxes and the Google PC microphones were only being used to monitor for ads.

      They told us that there were no monitors on our phone lines at AT&T.

      Look, if companies want more from their dollars, try this novel concept instead.

      Don't spy on your customers. Offer them a fair product at a fair price, and give quality customer support from LIVE HUMAN BEINGS.

      I promise, everything else will take care of itself after that. If you really feel the need to spy on people for 'demographic study', install one of your motion devices in your executive bathrooms.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MO, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 2:47pm

    Comcast Response

    First off, two things pop into my head...Invasion of Privacy and what about families that practice nudism....? What about getting Pay Per View, buying some adult entertainment for some after hours lovin' and...you can follow my train of thought on this one.

    Hmmmmm....let me think about this. The Exhibitionist in me thinks...hehe...why not. The realist in me says...uhm no.

    Cheers!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 9:46pm

      Re: Comcast Response

      First off, two things pop into my head...Invasion of Privacy and what about families that practice nudism....?

      Nudists don't care if people see them naked. That's the whole point of nudism!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Bobbknight, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 3:07pm

    Yea right

    Well no more masturbating to CineMax after dark!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 3:37pm

    No Way I like to Sit and Watch My after dark Shows.. Now I cant! isn't this invasion of privacy?

    Comcast get a life.. stop trying to hurt the cable industry!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ckye, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 3:40pm

    Re: Comcast Response

    Wii uses a camera? Well now that's news. And a Wii-like sensor bar is going to determine a child is there, how? Your spin is as bad as .... well you know who!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    hesitations, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 3:45pm

    Watching Me?

    They've been watching me for years and You Too.

    The microwave industry has long been transmitting personal data. What do you think they do with all that power? Just heat your coffee? !! It is satellite linked.

    You know how that thing in the bottom of the "oven" that turns? Do you know why? To line up with the satellite that is nearest.

    Personally, I've known that the whole point of digital TV was to facilitate two way data signals. My entire 52 inch plasma screen is a one-way mirror into the governments data centers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 6:27pm

    Who's watching the watchers? Really, now.

    If passport information can't be locked down..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Paul, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 8:35pm

    ugh

    If there's any chance that this will get streamed back to them, they'd be the biggest hypocrites ever. I mean, they complain they don't have a enough bandwidth so they do some traffic shaping... well, if they want to watch these videos, that's going to be a HELL of a lot of bandwidth...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Shane, Mar 21st, 2008 @ 8:42pm

    Webcam Are ya Nuts

    I dont care if it is for user adaptive programs, parental Controls....Cough Cough

    Can anyone say Orwell? instead of partying like its 1999, we are going all the way to 1984....

    Hmm lets see traffic shaping, peeping tom....No wonder i switched to DISH !

    No way on Gods green earth will i ever let these psychopathic idiots back into my house...What dipstick though this would be a good idea....What next your gonna tell us is for better viewing pleasure? Ha Right


    Hey Frank, why dont you guys find a way to increase your network or something useful instead of pissing off the rest of your customers...

    LONG LIVE DISH NETWORK

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    sensible scholar, Mar 22nd, 2008 @ 12:54pm

    Why is everyone so paranoid?

    There are some great applications such as video conferencing and the so-called child filters. Let's just simply request that it's default off, has a switch, and a activity light. When we act paranoid like this, it works against our cause of freedom. Comcast isn't an evil company, nor do they want to spy. Yes, there's lots of area for abuse, so let's make sure the hardware allows the user/owner to control it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 22nd, 2008 @ 1:03pm

      Re: Why is everyone so paranoid?

      There are some great applications such as video conferencing and the so-called child filters. Let's just simply request that it's default off, has a switch, and a activity light.
      Another great application is that it will help identify bad guys. Obviously they'll be the ones with something to hide and who'll turn the camera off. At the very least anyone who turns their camera off or blocks it should immediately be put on the no-fly list.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Animadverto, Mar 23rd, 2008 @ 8:37pm

        Re: Re: Why is everyone so paranoid?

        For the record, I was put on the no-fly-list. I was a corporate whistle blower. My telephone lines were tapped and whether you people realize this or not many of these boxes have had cameras and microphones in them for years. They are now just admitting this.

        Fortunate for me, I do not have a spouse or children. But make not mistake that they will use information to harm them, if they can not get to you.

        Fortunate for me, I knew the game and I used the game to put a foot up the crack of their corporatist backside. Don't be so eager to give up your right to illegal search and seizure. You will regret it.

        You are an ignorant person.

        At the end of WWII Niemoller wrote the following poem:

        They came for the Communists, and I

        didn't object - For I wasn't

        a Communist;

        They came for the Socialists, and I

        didn't object - For I wasn't a Socialist;

        They came for the labor leaders, and I

        didn't object - For I wasn't a labor leader;

        They came for the Jews, and I didn't

        object - For I wasn't a Jew;

        Then they came for me -

        And there was no one left to object.

        Martin Niemoller, German Protestant Pastor,

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Mar 24th, 2008 @ 9:34am

          Re: Re: Re: Why is everyone so paranoid?

          Then they came for me -
          And there was no one left to object.
          Well, he outlasted the rest of them didn't he? I'm sure those who objected where among the first to go.

          It's like the story of the conversation between two campers in bear country:

          First Camper - What would you do if we were attacked by a bear?
          Second Camper - Run.
          First Camper - Don't be silly. Humans can't outrun bears.
          Second Camper - I don't have to outrun the bear. Just you.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John, Mar 24th, 2008 @ 5:47pm

    Follow the money

    I forget where I heard it, but think about that quote: "Follow the money".

    Do we realistically think that Comcast is installing cameras to look for children and "filter content".
    The reality is that the camera is looking for children to filter the ads: if kids are in the room, the cable box should serve more adds for Barbie, Legos, and other toys.

    Want to watch the History Channel or the Discovery Channel? Sorry, there are kids in the room- the cable box will be permanently set on Hannah Montanna and cartoons (of course, fully funded by Disney) until the kids leave the room.

    We'll then see a reverse of the Neilson ratings: instead of 20 million people watching "Lost", 30 million cable boxes will be "filtered" to only show "Lost". (Again, funded by ABC's corporate parent, Disney.)

    This would be a cool idea, though: give Comcast enough money and they'll "filter" the cable box so only your show is being seen by everyone.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    slander q. libel, Mar 24th, 2008 @ 7:23pm

    PPV

    Just think... a couple orders some PPV adult programming, let things take their natural course, and the two of them might be someone else's PPV adult programming...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 25th, 2008 @ 12:28am

    Absolute F'king BS!!!! I'm taking my cable box apart tomorrow - if I find a camera - I will getting rich from the law suit that will follow!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Animadverto, Mar 25th, 2008 @ 12:36pm

    Good luck finding the camera or microphone. It does not look like your "common" video cam. Furthermore, not all of them have one..."yet". You will have to buy a new box.

    http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/

    http://educate-yourself.org/cn/gangstalkingoverview15se p06.shtml

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter78.htm

    You see...the "Corporatist Pimps" are all in cahoots with each other. I know; I have lived it for 15 years. I patiently wait to take the next one out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 15th, 2009 @ 10:20am

    there is no way this should ever be used. it will all end up on utube and nobody has a life anymore.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    kay, Feb 15th, 2009 @ 8:58pm

    That is it!!

    That is when we stop watching TV and don't have Comcast anymore. I won't pay for this! This is too much and over the top.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Cutchase, Jul 7th, 2009 @ 6:11pm

    Spy On Me

    Mr. Cutchase, why do you have an erection watching this
    Pancake commercial?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Charlie Bales, Dec 6th, 2012 @ 9:30pm

    comment

    Well I guess this means no more sitting on the couch eating tater chips in my underwear watching Hot In Cleveland on TV land anymore

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This