Supreme Court Agrees To Review FCC's Indecency Fines
from the fleeting-expletive-indeed dept
Since Kevin Martin took over the FCC, one area where he's been especially active is in trying to get "indecent" material off television. However, so far, things haven't gone all that well. A recent fine only got the content in question much more attention, and there are serious questions about just how offended people really are by what the FCC calls indecent. Most of the complaints to the FCC seem to be generated by form letter campaigns, pushed by people who never actually saw the content in question (or only saw it afterwards on the web). Last summer, an appeals court smacked down some FCC fines after it pointed out that the FCC seemed rather "arbitrary and capricious" in doling out fines for "fleeting expletives." Since there seemed to be no actual rules on what the FCC considered indecent, the court found it difficult to see how the fines were constitutional. Not surprisingly, the ruling was appealed and the Supreme Court will now take up the issue in a case that could have a major impact on the FCC's ability to fine networks for broadcasting "fleeting expletives."






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
On another FCC indecenty fine...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not likely
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Can only Hope...
There really shouldn't be a division of government trying to protect its citizens from their own culture.
Even if it does fail miserably at it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A different point of view
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A different point of view
I'd argue that the places where society is declining the most (Iraq, Iran, Sudan, etc.) are the places that have the tightest control over their television airwaves and have probably little to no "sex sells" advertising.
Just my two cents, but I think the real cause of any decline in society is the seeming inability for individuals to take responsibility for their own actions and/or decisions.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
RE: A different point of view by Jared
Screw that!
I'd prefer that Nick and Disney channels are NOT included in my Basic cable package! I actually find the programming on those 2 channels OFFENDING to my intelligence!!!
I'd prefer there be a family tier that you have to choose if you don't want the other programming when it comes to cable.
I like shows that are somewhat based on reality. Come on, people use expletives in every day life, why can't I have those occassional expletives in a fictional TV show I watch, that is based on every day life?
I don't mind seeing the sexual content. I'm not a prude, it doesn't offend me in the least. In fact I don't even think twice about seeing it, as I see it when I go out my front door in the summer, or to the beach.
There should be a special Tier of programming for prudes like Jared, and people who have children, it shouldn't be forced on average Americans, nor should it be forced on the average American to pay more for realistic programming.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A different point of view
I know what you mean: I think penises are funny. As long as it's infrequent, I think they should be shown on TV. Say no more than once an hour or so.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A different point of view
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: RE: A different point of view by Jared
What exactly in your challenged little mind constitutes an average American? So you think that most television is geared towards porn loving people like you? Get a life! Personally I don't care what your preferences are. There are people who have the very real responsibility of raising children (unlike you).
Perhaps you don't think that's important?
Since YOUR opinion differs you go off and start calling people names.
Grow up Coward!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A not particularly original point of view
Yeah, I think we all silently wish for the Temple Whores of yesteryear back when society meant something (and prayer something wholly different).
Seriously though, I submit that the only decline in society is due to those individuals (like yourself) who are threatened by sex.
If you see something you don't like - turn your countenance, fool.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It gets better. You should read some of the stuff FWIW has been spouting off over in this thread.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment