Canadian Folk Band Wants Harry Potter DVDs, CDs, Games Destroyed Due To Similar Name
from the oh-come-on dept
With all the attention the Streisand Effect is getting these days, don't be surprised when we see more people trying to use it on purpose to their own advantage. Witness the story sent in by reader Jon R, where a Canadian folk singing group is suing Warner Bros. Studios, demanding that all Harry Potter DVDs, CDs and video games that mentioned "The Weird Sisters" be destroyed. Why? Because the folk group has a name similar, but not the same as "The Weird Sisters." It seems like such a blatant "lawsuit for the sake of publicity" that we won't even bother to name the actual folk group's name. The band isn't suggesting that the Harry Potter stories are riding on its fame (which would be the normal trademark claim), but is saying that because they're such an unknown act, people will think they ripped the name off from Harry Potter: "Consumers will assume that the smaller and less famous Canadian band is trying to take advantage of the Harry Potter fame." Actually, my guess is that they'll think that a lot more for this bogus lawsuit than for having a different, but similar, name. Warner Bros., for its part, notes that the folk group filed a similar suit before, and was told to pay $140,000, which it has not.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Wyrd Sisters
Clearly the Canadian band is a bunch of jackasses.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Too Wyrd!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too Wyrd!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Too Wyrd!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Wyrd Sisters
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
There's no way I'd buy their music just because of this. Lil' whiners.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
JKR prolly knew this
So even when you do your due diligence, it can come back to haunt you.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: JKR prolly knew this
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: JKR prolly knew this
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Yep
The band formed in 1991
The book was published in 1988
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
More like The Scary Sisters!
From the photo, looks more like The Scary Sisters. Yikes!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Err... Shakespeare anyone?
So please no more comments about Rowling or Pratchett - you're about 500 years too late...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Err... Shakespeare anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Shake, spear, kick in the rear
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shake, spear, kick in the rear
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Shake, spear, kick in the rear
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
suing warner bros
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
also - cod piece jokes are always funny!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
what's left?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.ateaseweb.com/2005/10/01/canadian-folk-group-sues-jonny-phils-wyrd-sisters/
No t sure how that all ended, but I know a judge blocked their attempt to keep the movie out of distribution:
http://www.ateaseweb.com/2005/11/05/judge-dismisses-wyrd-sisters-motion-to-block-hp -film/
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
can i sue for no apperant reason too!? :)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment