RSS
Twitter
Canadian Folk Band Wants Harry Potter DVDs, CDs, Games Destroyed Due To Similar Name
from the oh-come-on dept
With all the attention the Streisand Effect is getting these days, don't be surprised when we see more people trying to use it on purpose to their own advantage. Witness the story sent in by reader Jon R, where a Canadian folk singing group is suing Warner Bros. Studios, demanding that all Harry Potter DVDs, CDs and video games that mentioned "The Weird Sisters" be destroyed. Why? Because the folk group has a name similar, but not the same as "The Weird Sisters." It seems like such a blatant "lawsuit for the sake of publicity" that we won't even bother to name the actual folk group's name. The band isn't suggesting that the Harry Potter stories are riding on its fame (which would be the normal trademark claim), but is saying that because they're such an unknown act, people will think they ripped the name off from Harry Potter: "Consumers will assume that the smaller and less famous Canadian band is trying to take advantage of the Harry Potter fame." Actually, my guess is that they'll think that a lot more for this bogus lawsuit than for having a different, but similar, name. Warner Bros., for its part, notes that the folk group filed a similar suit before, and was told to pay $140,000, which it has not.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
Wyrd Sisters
The norns, controllers of fate, and part of mythology are sometimes called the wyrd sisters. Clearly potter and the band drew from the same source. Last I checked, the norns and the Moirae Atropos, Clotho and Lachesis were both combined by pop mythology as the wyrd sisters. (wyrd means fate)
Clearly the Canadian band is a bunch of jackasses.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Too Wyrd!
Perhaps they should also try to sue author Terry Pratchett for his almost 20-year-old book entitled, "Wyrd Sisters."
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Too Wyrd!
ok! :)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Too Wyrd!
dahm it stop that, crap!, again
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Wyrd Sisters
One also wonders if Terry Pratchett could sue the band out of existence based on his book of that same name, which probably predates the band!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The "Streisand Effect" does not Equal GOOD attention.
There's no way I'd buy their music just because of this. Lil' whiners.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Far too many people believe (erroneously) the adage "Any publicity is good publicity".
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
JKR prolly knew this
JKR prolly knew the band existed (she did do her homework in other similiar matters) and thusly used a slightly different name in the books.
So even when you do your due diligence, it can come back to haunt you.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: JKR prolly knew this
You're kidding, right? "The Weird Sisters" is such an unthinkably unusual name that Rowling couldn't have thought of it independently?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: JKR prolly knew this
No Rowling borrowed Wyrd Sisters from Pratchett who may have lifted it from Shakespeare. The Bacon estate should sue.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Yep
To those guys above who had the same idea as me, quick and dirty wiki research shows that Pratchett should counter-sue
The band formed in 1991
The book was published in 1988
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
More like The Scary Sisters!
Checked out their website.
From the photo, looks more like The Scary Sisters. Yikes!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
This suit is nothing more than PR linkbait. I'd like to see Techdirt do some pieces on how people are using IP laws to promote themselves...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Err... Shakespeare anyone?
It was Shakespeare who popularised the term 'Weird Sisters' in Macbeth - it's the name for the three witches. And even that wasn't original.
So please no more comments about Rowling or Pratchett - you're about 500 years too late...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
No kidding? What part made you believe anyone is not taking this into account?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Err... Shakespeare anyone?
We all know it was Shakespeare who originated the "weird sisters" but, it was Pratchett who coined the phrase "The Wyrd Sisters." Since the band is called "The Wyrd Sisters," I think Prachett is a little more relevant than Shakespeare.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
More relevant that Shakespeare?!? How dare you sir. Once I get my cod piece back on I shall slap your face with my glove and demand satisfaction. Shakespeare irrelevant... indeed.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
Weird was spelled Wyrd back then
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Shake, spear, kick in the rear
Shakespeare wrote better prose accidentally whilst wiping his bottom with a dung rag than all the novels of Pratchett and Rowling combined, sir!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Shake, spear, kick in the rear
Good for him. He still wrote about weird sisters, not the Wyrd Sisters.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Shake, spear, kick in the rear
He wrote wyrd. Read the orriginal, if you can stand the spelling :-p
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
suing warner bros
Guess they're not selling out their shows and very few cd's. Gotta pay the rent somehow
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
how does one write accidently while wiping their bum???
also - cod piece jokes are always funny!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Shakespeare was foolish enough to let his copyright expire. If only he'd sold it to Disney...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
what's left?
No really.. when you think of it all of the unique and imaginative names have been long since taken so where do you draw the line? Someone is bound to come up with a name of a band, movie, book etc that has been used up at some point in time so freaking deal with it. If it is something absolutely blatant like you wanting to name your kid themed playground "Disney World" then for crap sake you should be kicked in the nuts and slapped with a lawsuit but what these retards are bringing up a lawsuit for is absurd. Change your name to the Flaming RoachCocks and be unique. Wait, that name was taken already. Nevermind.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
These same fools tried to sue Warner Brothers Entertainment Canada, Warner Brothers Records, Pulp’s Jarvis Cocker and Radiohead’s Phil Selway and Jonny Greenwood over the same issue a few years ago:
http://www.ateaseweb.com/2005/10/01/canadian-folk-group-sues-jonny-phils-wyrd-sisters/
No t sure how that all ended, but I know a judge blocked their attempt to keep the movie out of distribution:
http://www.ateaseweb.com/2005/11/05/judge-dismisses-wyrd-sisters-motion-to-block-hp -film/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
wtf! is wrong with people now? The band probaly sucks anyway. Beyotch!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
you whore!!! (funny though)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
wtf! is wrong with people now? The band probaly sucks anyway. Beyotch!
can i sue for no apperant reason too!? :)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The Wyrd's are weird. I think I shall avoid them, their music, their website, and any further articles about them.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
harry potter bin around since 1990
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment