RSS
Sometimes Good Guys Do Finish First
from the google-did-it dept
My friend Reihan Salam has an interesting piece in Slate that nicely pulls together much of the discussion at Princeton's Computing in the Cloud workshop last month. He argues that web startups that have cultivated a squeaky-clean image start to have difficulties when they start trying to monetize all the traffic they've generated. The most obvious example is Facebook's Beacon fiasco. Reihan suggests that the "immaculate capitalism" of early-stage startups gives way to ordinary profit-seeking once companies face pressures to turn a profit. There's clearly something to this, but I think Reihan's time horizon might be a little bit too short. Keep in mind that even the mighty Google faced questions about its profitability as it stubbornly resisted the pay-for-placement schemes that many other search engines adopted. Google's refusal to compromise the quality of its search results for short-term profits helped it build market share, and it ultimately found non-disruptive ways to monetize all of those eyeballs. Facebook and Wesabe are much younger companies, and so it's not too surprising that they haven't found the right model for monetizing their users. Ultimately, their reputation with users is their most valuable asset, and so it's smart business to safeguard that reputation, even at the cost of foregoing some short-term business opportunities.
6 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- French Court Fails Digital Economics; Claims Free Google Maps Is Illegal
- If Google Is Serious About Reforming Patent Mess, It Should Make A Bold Statement And Stop Using Motorola Patents To Demand Cash
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- The Web Is Saved: East Texas Jury Says Eolas Patents Are Invalid
- Capitalism And Doing Good Are Not Mutually Exclusive
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
gotta agree with post #1
Any site that gets info from other sites without asking me first is somewheres near lawsuit land in my opinion. It's still only a matter of time. The unfairness here is the difficulty in pinning it down. Whose fault is it? Yelp for giving Facebook the information, or Facebook for getting it from Yelp for example?
Since those agreements are confidential the only way to get some info is to go forward with a lawsuit and subpoena. This is absolutely stupid.
No amount of PR can rationalize off that you're just trying to monetize your customers in any way possible.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
So just don't use it then
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Are they forced to join facebook.com?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Are they forced to join facebook.com?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment