Blackboard Wins Lawsuit Over E-Learning Patent
from the not-how-the-system-was-supposed-to-work dept
Blackboard is a distance learning company that claims to hold patents on the concept of distance learning. It wasted little time in suing competitors even as a close examination of the patent showed that it wasn't just obvious, but there was plenty of prior art on it. A formal challenge to the patent was launched, and the Patent Office agreed to review the patent over a year ago, but has yet to do much on that re-exam. However, while everyone waits for that, the lawsuit went forward, and a jury has decided that the patent is valid and the company Desire2Learn owes Blackboard $3 million (found via Troll Tracker). There will be an appeal of course, and maybe one of these days someone at the Patent Office will realize that it issued a patent on something rather obvious with a ton of prior art.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Great
And until, or unless the patent office reverses the Blackboard patent, we're stuck with one of the crappiest online learning software I've ever had the misfortune to use.
EtG
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
ITT
ITT Technical Institute does this sort of thing (distance learning) and they don't do it via Blackboard. They're a for profit trade school so if they had a choice between patent royalties and not doing it, they'd probably not do it.
So go Blackboard! Way to promote education: sue others into the ground to prevent them from doing it online.
PS, in 2002 I took one of my classes online during the summer at Clark Community College so I wouldn't have to take it in High School. But that's probably not prior art to their patent, or grounds for it being obvious. I mean it's only what just about every school in the Northwest offers due to weather and distance conditions.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Pre-Web Concept
Distance Learning is a patent concept?! give us a break..this concept exists even in the pre-web age through open universities.
Blackboard is just trying to fight back a disparate case after seeing how free and open sources e-Learning software and other decent commercial companies has developed great systems and are away ahead of blackboard!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: ITT
I'm not sure how the patent laws work in that regard, but I would think that if a college created their own distance-learning web applications, and were not trying to license it out to others...then it'd be ok.
I mean, if I was to build my own iPhone (I know, I'm reaching here) and infringe the patents of Apple, I can't imagine them even remotely caring that I made my own...as long as it was for my own use and not to be licensed or sold (especially as an "iPhone" - which I guess is a trademark issue).
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
As I understand it
This is just multiple roles in an OU, something that most corporations and colleges have been doing for 10 or 15 years in AD, LDAP, etc.
I fail to see how this is patentable.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
we were doing distance learning applications in 19
using MPG over ATM video and audio and ethernet over ATM for the PC connectivity.
Was there something that was particular to the case that made something in the technique patentable.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Sounds like working in the patent office is a pretty easy job...not compelled to do anything you don't feel like, and there's no deadlines, and no requirement to have your decisions make any sense. I guess I'm just jealous I don't have a comfy civil service job with that kind of description? Or is it that I feel sad about the state the U.S. is slipping into? Or is it both?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Oh come on. There have been correspondence courses for many, many years. How could this patent possibly be 'valid'?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Sad day indeed...
I imagine they are suggesting that the way they allow one login with multiple courses and separate roles per course is what they have patented.
When I was in college, I was working with the Ed Tech group and we sampled Desire2Learn ... by far a superior product.
They listened to what we wanted, their programmers were adding features all the time. It was faster, smoother, and prettier than Blackboard. It's really a shame.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
So Blackboard is like SCO?
Repeated. We all know what happened to SCO when they tried trivial lawsuits on invalid patents.
There is no way that having role based access control is patentable - otherwise pretty much everyone in the software industry would be out of business.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment