Cyberlawyer Gives Up Attempt To Register Cyberlaw As A Trademark
from the chalk-one-up-for-the-cybermasses dept
Last month, we noted that a lawyer wasn't just trying to trademark the term "cyberlaw" but was already threatening other lawyers for using the term. As the news broke a bunch of folks (mainly lawyers) pointed out how ridiculous this was, and now the guy has dropped his attempt to trademark the term (though he is still trying to trademark a logo of the term). He claims: "It was very clear that this was not going to be an academic argument, it was going to be more of a shouting match, and I didn't think it was worth my time to get involved in a shouting match with people that were going to shout louder." However, as Eric Golman notes at the link above: "Funny--I would have thought it wasn't worth his time because the application was completely unmeritorious."






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Anyway, I'm calling dibs on eLaw. It's an obvious joke, but obvious doesn't seem to be a defense anymore.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ha Ha
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re Trademarks
I would suggest 'cyberlaw' along with 'Internet' would be in this category. It is also possible for registered marks to effectively lose their status through this process - and example is the word 'lite' that seems to pop up everywhere these days.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
trademark
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment