RSS
Deflating Rumors Of Google Offering Broadband-By-Balloon
from the head-in-the-clouds dept
Say what you want about the Wall Street Journal, but they're generally pretty reliable on fact checking and not reporting baseless rumors. That's why it's strange to see a report in the Journal about Google's supposed interest in buying up a balloon-based wireless data company. For many years, we've seen all different reports about attempts to offer wireless data services using various types of floating devices. Sometimes it's via blimps, sometimes it's via other systems using bizarre names like "HAPs" (for "high altitude platforms"), or "stratellite" or "aerostats". Then there's my favorite such plan: broadband delivered via retired Soviet spy planes. All of these plans had slight differences in terms of how they worked -- but one similarity: they were basically all full of hot air.
While they tend to generate plenty of attention, they tend not to be particularly practical. The stratellite folks have been particularly egregious in issuing press releases that gullible reporters fall for every six months or so. The WSJ story about these balloons seems even more ridiculous in terms of practicality: the balloons only stay afloat for 24-hours, before they burst and the transmitter floats to the ground, where it needs to be recovered and then relaunched. Seriously. Yet, the WSJ says that Google may be interested in buying this company, offering nothing to back that up other than "people familiar with the matter." This reads like a story placed by the company itself trying to drum up interest. I don't doubt that folks from Google may have met with the company, but it seems like a stretch to think that they're seriously interested in sending up balloons with data transmitters every 24-hours. Then again, who would have thought they'd send around people in cars taking photos of everything. It just seems that Google's interest should have a bit more evidence behind it before taking it seriously.
While they tend to generate plenty of attention, they tend not to be particularly practical. The stratellite folks have been particularly egregious in issuing press releases that gullible reporters fall for every six months or so. The WSJ story about these balloons seems even more ridiculous in terms of practicality: the balloons only stay afloat for 24-hours, before they burst and the transmitter floats to the ground, where it needs to be recovered and then relaunched. Seriously. Yet, the WSJ says that Google may be interested in buying this company, offering nothing to back that up other than "people familiar with the matter." This reads like a story placed by the company itself trying to drum up interest. I don't doubt that folks from Google may have met with the company, but it seems like a stretch to think that they're seriously interested in sending up balloons with data transmitters every 24-hours. Then again, who would have thought they'd send around people in cars taking photos of everything. It just seems that Google's interest should have a bit more evidence behind it before taking it seriously.
I have an app...
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
How My First Game Made $28,623
I have an idea...
Finding Co-Founders in a Recovering Economy
Securing Venture Capital for that Next App Development
I have a business...
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
niche uses
Really, whats a few 10's of millions of dollars to google anyways.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A modest proposal
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
How about with Wind Turbines?
http://www.symscape.com/blog/flying-wind-turbines-blog-action-day
I can very much see Google looking into that. Heck, even I thought about that. ^_^
However, there are some practicality hurdles and it's very weather centric.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
How about with Wind Turbines?
http://www.symscape.com/blog/flying-wind-turbines-blog-action-day
I can very much see Google looking into that. Heck, even I thought about that. ^_^
However, there are some practicality hurdles and it's very weather centric.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How about with Wind Turbines?
(ps: Sorry for the dble post! The ajax reply to comment box confused me when the submit button didn't show up)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Interesting
What I am saying is this must all be true or that reporter is really, really, really (one more) really gullible. It had to seems ridiculous, so the reporter triple checked everything. Right?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
nice spell checker I have there
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Think outside the box
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hmmm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The company doing this
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
May be feasible
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment