RSS
Twitter
Suing Google Because You Don't Like What It Links To
from the another-day,-another-bogus-Google-lawsuit dept
Google's lawyers certainly are kept busy these days, given all the
questionable lawsuits that seem to keep showing up. We've already
covered numerous examples of Google getting sued by people who don't
like how certain sites are ranked -- including last week's story of a
Chinese professor who is planning to sue Google (and Yahoo) to call
attention to the fact that both search engines have removed all evidence
of his existence from their search engines in China (after he called for
a more democratic China). Reader Jon writes in to let us know of
a slightly different lawsuit against Google. Rather than complaining
about missing content, this one is about there being too much content
found by Google. That is, two Australian real estate agents are suing
Google for linking to an allegedly defamatory article about the
agents.
Of course, even if the article is totally and completely defamatory,
it's hard to see how Google has any liability whatsoever. If there's a
defamatory article, then the liability is on whoever wrote it and put it
online. The fact that Google found it in a search shouldn't transfer
liability to them -- even if (as the agents indicate) Google was told
that the content was defamatory. Google is merely a search engine and
cannot be held liable for the content it links to. Hopefully this case
gets thrown out of court rather quickly.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Question....Would they even know the negative article even existed without Google????
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
People sure are stupid these days.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I'm going to sue sprint because someone once said something defamatory about me on their cellphone over sprints network.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
horible
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
bad very bad.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
maybe people failed to realize that theyre not paying google for anything and its not a public service, its a company.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ok
Would this apply to: Suing The Pirate Bay Because You Don't Like What It Links To
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Works
they sue because it keeps working.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
i think that's the point.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
WOW, if it's this bad now imagine what it will be like for our kids
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
"Google is merely a search engine and cannot be held liable for the content it links to. Hopefully this case gets thrown out of court rather quickly"
Sounds like Pirate Bay....
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
While I agree that google can't be held accountable for the content of others peoples pages, I do believe they should be held accountable for their own content. If they are caching or linking to, say, Tubgirl, I'm pretty sure it falls WELL within 99.9% of everyone's ethical belief system that it SHOULD be removed. Now, then, the line is drawn at the completely subjective "what is unethical?"
The reason I agree with this article is that I don't believe the courts should answer this very important question for us.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by Google Master on Feb 11th, 2008 @ 10:41am
I think it is more greed than stupidity at this point. People want to see how far they can bend the legal tape
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Barbara would be proud
Just in case anyone was interested, heres the link to the original article in question http://www.jenmangroup.com.au/news_item.php?id=368
Just for the laugh I used Yahoo to find it ;0)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Thinking the same thing
as poster #7 and #11.
Pirate Bay has the same situation.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
all of you guys are GAY i hate every one of u. get at me daw!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment