Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  Chronno S. Trigger, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 1:39pm

  
  

  WTF?

  I may be reading the attached article wrong but I believe it's saying that the record industry is trying to offer a subscription bast system that will allow people to download all the music they want for $5. This 5$ can be subsidized by the ISP or the device manufacturer. Due to this idea they are now under an anti-trust investigation. Why? They want to offer a service that is what people want (No details on these restrictions) at a price they would pay or even not have to pay depending on how they get it. Why is this such a bad thing?
  
  "The subscription model is the only way to save the music business," Rubin has said. "If music is easily available at a price of five or six dollars a month, then nobody will steal it."
  
  Sounds like someone got the idea finally.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 1:53pm

  
  

  Subscription services are doomed if they don't allow portability. People want content on players, PC's, phones, TV's etc. whenever they want as often as they want. Any subscription service that limits portability is dead at the gate.
  
  Their approach raises antitrust issues because the label's would control the entire supply chain. The Justice Department takes a dim view of vertical integration/dominance.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  TomTheToe, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 1:58pm

  
  

  Re:WTF?

  "They want to offer a service that is what people want (No details on these restrictions) at a price they would pay or even not have to pay depending on how they get it. Why is this such a bad thing?" As was brought forth in the article the last time they did this, "The DoJ investigated a number of complaints, the strongest of which was that the major labels refused to license their catalogues to competing music service providers." A collusion of this magnitude by the record companies would put all other pay music services out of business. Only Apple and Sony would be big enough to afford to license any music from the big 4 music companies. The consumer would be left with no internet music download sources except what the label would allow. No thanks.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Chronno S. Trigger, Feb 8th, 2008 @ 10:58am

  
  

  Re: Re:WTF?

  A valid point but technically they can already refuse to license to any one they want, they can force any price restriction they want, since they own the copyright to all the music.
  
  If I sell a product threw resellers and then all of a sudden I chose to sell it directly and not have resellers any more, is that monopolistic? Not if I still have competition. The RIAA still had the smaller labels and indie bands to contend with.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Eric the Grey, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 2:42pm

  
  

  I doubt it's just the offering of the service

  Not that they are offering the service, but perhaps that they are using their leverage (ie: copyright) to prevent anybody else from entering the field with the same idea.
  
  The RIAA has certainly made it clear that nobody but them will be allowed to operate such a program and they are using DRM or Illegal Downloads, or whatever else they can to prevent it. They are THE reason the downloads haven't taken off with the exception of iTunes, and they keep trying to cripple that...
  
  
  EtG

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 2:53pm

  
  

  Re: Post number 2

  i have an old version of the free version of TMPGEnc that will convert any video file to mpg (including wmv files with license restrictions) and any audio file to mp3.
  
  id love a service like that.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 2:55pm

  
  

  Mike would some1 tell me why my posts keep getting blocked of?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Tommy, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 6:03pm

  
  

  Wha?

  Doesn't anyone remember mp4? Oh yeah... exactly...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Overcast, Feb 7th, 2008 @ 6:40pm

  
  

  So technically.. if so - than the RIAA is an accomplice?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  poster 5 and 6, Feb 8th, 2008 @ 5:13am

  
  

  ty

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ken Hanscom, Feb 9th, 2008 @ 9:26am

  
  

  Go away.

  The RIAA and the labels are killing themselves. They just need to go away.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment