EU Looks To Destroy Fashion Innovation; Begins Enforcing Fashion Copyrights

from the a-big-step-backwards dept

We've spent plenty of time discussing how innovation thrives in the fashion industry, despite a lack of intellectual property covering designs -- as well as rampant copying. In fact, recent studies have shown that the reason the industry is thriving is because of the lack of intellectual property protection -- leading to a much more dynamic and competitive environment, leading to a more rapid pace of innovation. However, despite all that innovation going on in the industry, some in the US have been looking to add new intellectual property laws that cover fashion designs. This makes no sense. The purpose of intellectual property laws is to encourage innovation and creation. If the industry is already thriving, there is no sensible rationale for then adding in those laws -- unless it's an attempt to slow down innovation and allow the current leaders some monopoly on the legacy business they've already developed. In other words, it's corporate welfare for the leaders in the space, designed to squeeze out any innovations.

We may start to see just how pointless a move this was, as over in Europe they decided to grant some IP protections to fashion designs a few years ago. Those new regulations had not been enforced... until now. eoinmonty writes in to let us know that a UK designer has won a lawsuit against a retailer for selling clothing that was similar in design to that of a well known designer, Karen Miller. Now, some will argue that this kind of ruling doesn't hurt innovation because the one getting sued was merely copying. But that's assuming that the story only goes one-deep. As the research on the fashion industry has shown, when knockoff clothing is made, it simply encourages the brand name designers to continue to design something newer and better, pushing the industry forward. If Karen Miller doesn't have to worry about competition, then she can rest on her laurels and has less incentive to continue to design yet another new line of clothes, slowing down the pace of innovation in the fashion industry.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 27th, 2007 @ 1:56pm

    We could just set up a panel of intelligent people who decide when it's alright to sue for copyright and when it's just dumb. Then we could execute the people that are dumb. It's work great, till the government decided to make money off it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Captain Nemo, Dec 27th, 2007 @ 1:59pm

    Re:

    Blech. That stinks of Oligarchy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Alfred E. Neuman, Dec 27th, 2007 @ 2:03pm

    Two leg patent

    Great! Hope I can corner the market on pants with two legs.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Overcast, Dec 27th, 2007 @ 5:01pm

    If I copyright stupidity, can I sue them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    yogi, Dec 27th, 2007 @ 10:24pm

    Not such a bad deal

    if the end result is the ruin of the fashion industry.
    I'm sure humanity can live without completely changing its wardrobe every six months.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Erik Jan, Dec 28th, 2007 @ 4:51am

    Predictable

    This development should not come as a surprise. I think the driving force behind this is the fact that ¨luxury brands¨ (and I think every fashion designer can be seen as one) have been trying for some time now to enter into the the normal non-luxury (price wise) markets. We have seen designers producing one of collections for retailers like H%M, we increasingly find designer houses with shops on the highstreet selling to the semi affluent normal public. The effect of all this is that suddenly copying cuts directly into their profits, while only a short few years ago it did not. Not so long ago the luxury brands sold more or less exclusively to the rich. And in that situation copies are probably beneficial because they add to the ¨myth¨, they are proof of the fact that everyone wants a xyz fashion accessory, that it is in fact very specail. Now more or less everyone can have one, and the copy is a problem. Personally (as a non fashion victim) I don´t think there is much of a problem. The fact that the big luxury brands have started selling their stuff to basically everyone is the start of the end for the brands. They are after all status goods, and the status disappears when everyone can have one.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Roger, Dec 28th, 2007 @ 7:35am

    I guess that there will be real "fashion police" n

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Steve R. (profile), Dec 28th, 2007 @ 8:20am

    Fashion is Subjective

    Copyright is sliding down the slippery slope. Applying the law to subjective content means that justice belongs to the "deep-pockets". I can see it now, lawsuits where a three button designer is sued by a two button designer claiming that the use of two buttons is infringement but the three button designer claims it is substantially different.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Wholesaler, Dec 28th, 2007 @ 10:18am

    Extreme Imitators

    Of course, there are two sides to every story, and those who take it to the extreme can ruin it for everyone

    However, this could have an effect on any replica designs.

    There is an entire industry that is influenced by designers and offer more affordable, attractive alternatives

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Shirley Willett, Dec 29th, 2007 @ 11:32am

    Re: Two leg patent

    Sorry, two legs were created by the Persians in ancient times. Even three legs has a prehistory during the Rennaissance in England - a pair of trunk hose with the 3rd leg the codpiece!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    JImmy, Mar 20th, 2008 @ 5:01am

    mary

    hi i smell

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This