RSS
Why Is Kevin Martin Advertising The DTV Switch On Dish Network?
from the confusion-reigns dept
Last week, we noted that the GAO was concerned that the FCC didn't have plans in place to educate consumers about the switch from analog TV to digital TV, set to take place in February of 2009. Kevin Martin and the FCC shot back that the GAO was incorrect, and it has an education campaign well planned out. It would appear that's true, but that campaign is already raising some controversy. Reader MaxB312 writes in to point us to a Public Service Announcement that Martin himself filmed for Dish Network:
As the summary of the video makes clear, some people are interpreting this commercial to be a sly way of suggesting that those who have analog TV should just sign up for Dish rather than getting a converter. Martin makes it clear that Dish Network subscribers have nothing to worry about, since this only impacts free over-the-air (FOTA) TV, and then says "but if your TV has rabbit ears or a rooftop antenna, you'll need a satellite box or a converter box." The problem is that you really only "need" a converter box -- not satellite. A satellite box would get you entirely beyond the issue of FOTA TV. Of course, so would a cable service -- which Martin doesn't mention at all. No wonder, since he apparently has it in for cable companies. While I don't necessarily buy the conspiracy theory that this is an attempt to help out satellite providers, it does raise an important question: why is the FCC advertising this to people for whom it won't matter? Why would the FCC put PSAs on either satellite or cable TV offerings when the switch doesn't impact those people at all? Perhaps the GAO's real complaint wasn't that the FCC didn't have a plan on how to educate people -- but that the plan consisted of educating the wrong group of people. Update: Well that answers that. As a bunch of folks noted in the comments, it's mainly targeted at rural areas where the broadcast OTA stations aren't all available via Dish.
I’m looking for policy...
Policy Resources: Data Privacy & Security
Developers On Patents: Five Employees, Six Lawyers
I have an idea...
75 Questions To Help You Write An RFP For Website Design
From Noodles And Hot Sauce To Funding In 9 Weeks, With Oomf Founder Mikael Cho
I have a business...
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
How To Successfully Get Your App Into China
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Too Paranoid?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is a fact for many rural households
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Me too
I also have an antenna hooked up to my DISH box, so I can receive the ONE local HDTV channel available (none of the other 4 locals have started offering digital signals yet). DISH also does not carry the local HDTV signal, which sucks.
I'd be more interested in being provided with information on when each individual station is going to provide digital signals to DISH and IF they will provide them to me.
I assume they don't have the satellite capacity to provide HDTV locals nationwide, so local rural markets are ignored - for now?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This seems to be a similar issue, telling satellite users why they need to upgrade to satellite =P
I personally came to the conclusion that it must be for the off-chance that you have a guest at your home who doesn't have a digital solution or satellite provider. Nothing else really makes sense to me.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
FCC DishNetwork Commercial
Did it not occur to you that Kevin states you'll need a "converter" box (a digital receiver box for OTA signals) or a satellite box (both of which are true) after the deadline, and that this was created as a "DishNetwork" commercial, because many people were afraid that even DishNetwork services would be affected? I don't have enough fingers and toes to count how many people I've had to explain this to.
If, in my lil' town of 17k people, I've had to explain over and over again, it will most likely be a problem all over the US. Yes, people like you and I understand that OTA signals from our local stations and a satellite signal are different, but the "Average Joe" has no clue.
This is such a non-story, my side hurts. There surely had to be *something* else you could have reported on.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This is a fact for many rural households
Local affiliates can't get on the satellites because most of them can't afford the $20,000 it costs (for equipment) to get your station added to their lineup.
The people that upset me the most are the satellite TV installers who advertise on local channels and tell unsuspecting consumers that "you can get all your local channels for only a few dollars more per month" when they know perfectly well that you can't get your local channels because they're not available.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Still doesnt make sense..
1: have a vested interest
2: viewers will be impacted
Viewers who dont watch the locals, and already have dish, dont care, and wont be impacted, so putting it on some digital dish channel is irrelevant... Put the ad on the local news, or "oprah" and you'll get all the viewers that'll be impacted..
Also, the implication of the requirement of a sat box, excluding cable, is suspect.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
it's obvious
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cable does it too
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: #2 Falindraun
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Shift to digital TV
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Angry At the Forced Switch
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Angry At the Forced Switch
Why? Because the gov't gave those signals to the networks for free despite them being tremendously valuable. On top of that, the gov't gave the networks another set of spectrum for digital. If you look at who owns most of the available spectrum, you'll find that a HUGE portion is tied up for the TV networks, who never paid for it. That's a huge problem.
Why force instead of rely on true free market principles (people liking HD better, but not forced to only have digital)?
HD has nothing to do with digital... Also, I'm unclear on how giving the networks a TON of spectrum for free is "relying on true free market principles). Seems like the reverse to me. By taking the spectrum back and actually putting it to good use, it seems like the free market will actually decide what it should be used for.
Because big business: the cable, satellite, the above DishNetwork and HD TV makers all want to get more money from us by forcing, rather than simply selling, a different tech.
You need to learn a little bit about what's happening. This has nothing to do with HDTV. This has nothing to do with cable or satellite. You are arguing about something totally unrelated to the spectrum shift.
And according to DTVAnswers.com, the freed analog space will be "available" (i.e., stolen by) "Entrepeneurs" to "use for more electronic purposes."
Huh? Wow. You really need to learn a little bit more about what's going on. No one is "stealing" the spectrum. The networks were originally granted the spectrum for free. What's happening now is that it will finally be sold so it can be put to good use.
Maybe when more people get outraged they will push back the deadline further or work to repeal (unlikely) the Bush Congress' 2005 ruling that sold out the analog (i.e. free) tv.
Again, you REALLY need to learn. The switch to digital TV does not change what TV will be available for free. Digital TV will still be available for free over the air. That's what this is about. It has nothing to do with cable or satellite. In fact, you should be able to get better quality over the air TV (yes, for free) after the switch.
You appear to be very, very, very confused about what this story is about. I'd suggest you do some reading on it before you complain.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Angry At the Forced Switch
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment