Legal Issues

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
buy it now, patents

Companies:
ebay, mercexchange



Latest Chapter Of MercExchange/eBay Lawsuit: eBay Told To Pay $30 Million

from the ain't-over-yet dept

While you may recall the Supreme Court's decision in the MercExchange/eBay case from a year and a half ago, that was really just over one technical point at issue in the case: should a judge automatically issue an injunction to stop the sale of a product if that product is found to be infringing. Thankfully, the Supreme Court recognized that injunctions don't always make sense. However, once that was decided, the rest of the case still had to proceed. Based on the Supreme Court ruling, it was no surprise earlier this summer that the judge denied an injunction against eBay, but this week he did approve a $30 million judgment against the company -- representing the $25 million earlier award, plus another $5 million in interest.

The case isn't over yet, though. eBay has vowed to appeal the ruling. While the Supreme Court ruling on injunctions was an important one in preventing some of the worst abuses of the patent system, this case is still something of a travesty. MercExchange had claimed patents over all different aspects of online auctions, and while some of those patents were tossed out of the case, eBay was still found to infringe for daring to offer a "buy it now" feature on an auction. What no one has yet been able to explain is how the idea of a "buy it now" option on an auction should ever be patentable. It's simply a feature and a natural offering for any auction site to include at some point or another. It wasn't some brilliant idea that deserves a huge monopoly preventing all others from offering such a simple feature. Yet, tragically, with the way our patent system works, that's what has happened.

10 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Dec 12th, 2007 @ 5:49pm
  • Response

    by Alfred E. Neuman

    EBay should patent a "Bite Me Now" response to such silliness.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 12th, 2007 @ 5:52pm
  • by Bartman

    the way our patent system works


    HA!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 12th, 2007 @ 5:56pm
  • I plan to patent

    by Ajax 4Hire

    by me now!

    A way of authoring information and mundane knowledge that others already know but that I state.

    by me now!(tm)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 12th, 2007 @ 7:04pm
  • by Adimax

    Yeah, hopefully with a $30 million dollar price tag for ending up the loser in this, eBay will fight this forever. Thats absurd to patent.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 12th, 2007 @ 8:48pm
  • So Stupid

    "Buy it now" printed in a little box that takes you straight to the product is the stupidest thing to patent I have ever heard of, though I'm sure there are many more.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 12th, 2007 @ 9:17pm
  • by Grady

    Hmmm, isn't $30 million a bit much? Did the lose that much, or possibly of gained that much through this patent?

    And what next? MercExchange suing Blizzard for it's "Buyout" option in its online game World of Warcraft? As ridiculous as this is, they might as well try... Wait, maybe I shouldn't feed them these thoughts....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 12th, 2007 @ 11:31pm
  • The WoW auction house is next.

    by Loganscomputer

    I can see it now, the buy it now price is gone from the WoW auction house and the court fines Blizzard 25 million Gold pieces for daring to put it in there, oh yeah and a level 70 blood elf mage.

    It's only a matter of time!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 13th, 2007 @ 5:38am
  • Prior Art?

    by icon Killer_Tofu (profile)

    Didn't they offer instant buy outs in auctions as far back as the 1600's?
    I am sure it is hardly a new idea.

    On another note, somebody actually trademarked "Brown Chicken Brown Cow" (think generic sleezy porn sound if you tried to put it into words).

    .. I'm not joking about that one.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 13th, 2007 @ 10:56am
  • The World Has Gone Insane

    by PatentMyAss

    Its really funny when reading news articles about this case to see the term "technology" used to describe this asinine patent. Exactly what "technology" is involved in displaying a button that lets a buyer buy a product for the price advertised? Here is the price. If you want to buy this product for this price, click here. Wow! This is really Rocket Science. It sure must have taken a Super Genius to invent the "technology" that allows someone to indicate acceptance of an offered price.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It