Google Ordered To Reveal Blogger's IP In Israel
from the sorry,-no-anonymity-for-you dept
Someone who prefers to remain anonymous writes in to let us know that: "An Israeli court has ordered Google to reveal the identity of a blogger that uses Google's own blogging platform, Blogger. The blogger accused a Shaarei Tikva comity member of illegal acts all through his blog posts. Google objected to the request claiming freedom of speech, however the court sided with the plaintiff and said that since the plaintiff is a public figure running for reelection, he is allowed to confront his accuser and clear his name." Google did, apparently, try to reach the blogger in question who did not respond, and the company only needs to hand over an IP address -- which isn't necessarily the blogger's "identity," though it could lead to it. There's nothing wrong with a court requiring a service provider to cough up identifying information on someone who has broken the law -- but it gets into very tricky territory when it comes to things like libel. We recently covered a number of similar cases in the UK where the results were the same -- but a case in the US had the judge determine that the anonymous speech was protected and the person shouldn't be revealed. It seems likely that we're only going to see more of these cases over time -- and questions about jurisdiction are only going to make them more confusing. What if the blogger in this case actually resides in the US, for example?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Here's an idea...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's an idea...
Isn't that a touch hypocritical coming from someone called 'TheDock22'??
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's an idea...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Would you please include your ip address when you post.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's an idea...
Wow, that is quite possibly the most idiotic thing I have heard today. I applaud you for the humor you have contributed to my day, however, I object to the fact you may reproduce.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Fixed, thanks!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Isn't the blogger doing business in the USA since Google is in the US? Does Google need to obey an Israeli court?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
anonymous posting ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's an idea...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: anonymous posting ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Really, it's both. The blogger is doing business with a US company... but Google is accessed in Israel. It's complicated, but I suppose it's sort of like Google is shipping a product to Israel that has to comply with Israeli regulations.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I think expectations to export American law around the globe are a tad colonial ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Here's an idea...
Well Dock is in my name. But I was mostly trying to be sarcastic than make a truthful statement. People are touchy today.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha
You know my IP, don't you ?
Now try to get a name... Good luck with that...
Hint: if you post through a proxy firewall the only way to get a computer and person id is by using a court ordered subpoena on firewall logs - a highly unlikely event unless you do something really really stipud, like threaten some high-ranking government official etc.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: anonymous posting ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha
Always wear clean underwear
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: anonymous posting ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Doing business in Israel
There are famous U.S. cases about this practice. Most notably, International Shoe v. Washington (326 U.S. 310 (1945)). The question should be: "Is Google 'doing business' by making blogspot available to people in Israel?" Are they making any money from blogspot? Probably.
There is precedent for blocking IP addresses coming from foreign IP's. Notice Torrentspy's decision to block all U.S. originating IP addresses. This would turn Google into a non-world-wide phenomenon (offer not available in certain countries, YMMV). Of course, the horse is already out the gate, in this case, so it won't help this Anonymous Blogger.
Google can whine and go to the U.S. government. We'll see what happens after that. This could get interesting.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Oops, I meant Blogger
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's an idea...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Danglerose ..
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Doing business in Israel
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Doing business in Israel
"how will israel enforce any ruling on google when all there assets are in the US? Israel cant do anything unless they were to come to the us with weapons and say google give us the ip address."
All Israel has to do is ban google's ip from their country much like China has done several times, and Google will change their tone. It would be difficult to prove Google is "wrong" by not coughing up the IP, but you can't stop Israel from banning Google either.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The English translation of the Israeli Blogspot bl
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
chaneg ip address
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment