Vonage Settles AT&T Patent Suit; Anyone Else Want To Squeeze Free Money Out Of Vonage?

from the just-find-a-voip-patent-and-sue dept

The various patent lawsuits against Vonage have been a perfect example of almost everything that's wrong with the patent system. Vonage was the clear leader in this space -- being the first to successfully get this type of product to a widespread audience, even as the idea had been talked for years. Vonage's success had nothing to do with its technology acumen. The concepts behind VoIP services were widely known and widely discussed. The problem facing the space had always been an inability by any company to package it up in a way that people would buy it. Vonage figured that out. And for it, it got sued into oblivion by all the companies who were unable or unwilling to figure out. Just the fact that there were so many patents covering the basic concepts of "VoIP" (even when there was so much prior art) should have been a warning sign that perhaps most of those patents were bogus. However, once Vonage's investors started pressuring Vonage to just settle the cases, things only got worse. Vonage settled with Verizon and Sprint and even with some small patent holder very few people had heard of. With Vonage quickly trying to settle any such lawsuit, you can bet that plenty of companies went hunting through their patent portfolios, looking to see if they had anything related to VoIP which they could use to sue Vonage over. AT&T quickly found something and sued Vonage, knowing the company would quickly cough up some money. And, cough it up, it did. Vonage has agreed to pay AT&T $39 million. Anyone else have a VoIP patent? Might as well sue while Vonage's wallet is wide open...


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Joe, Nov 8th, 2007 @ 8:26pm

    AT&T vs Vonage

    If I would have wanted to do business with AT&T I would have called them. Oh, That's Right .... AT&T NEVER Had a plan for VOip.

    They were too afraid of VOip because it requires REAL Customer Service instead of lies and lip service. And it allows "portability that AT&T will Never Tolerate!

    Go Vonage! At least it happened now while AT&T is too busy ripping off it's new celular customers to figure out what VOip is really worth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Bah who needs one, Nov 8th, 2007 @ 8:27pm

    Vonage made a big mistake. Once you have paid the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    First is First

    All that matters though is who actually had VoIP technology put on paper and had it patented first. I don't see them giving up and settle unless they saw they could not win in court, especially for the amount they settled for.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 8th, 2007 @ 9:20pm

    Re: AT&T vs Vonage

    Oh, That's Right .... AT&T NEVER Had a plan for VOip.
    Actually, AT&T does have a VoIP system. It's called CallVantage and it isn't doing very competing in the marketplace against companies like Vonage. That's why you may have never heard of it. These days when you fail in the marketplace you go to court instead.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 8th, 2007 @ 9:30pm

    Re: First is First

    I don't see them giving up and settle unless they saw they could not win in court, especially for the amount they settled for.
    Companies often settle cases that they could have otherwise won in court if the cost of going to trial would exceed the cost of settling. That's a situation that patent trolls often exploit to great profit.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Tempest, Nov 8th, 2007 @ 10:16pm

    Junk patents

    "All that matters though is who actually had VoIP technology put on paper and had it patented first."

    See:

    "the fact that there were so many patents covering the basic concepts of "VoIP" (even when there was so much prior art) should have been a warning sign that perhaps most of those patents were bogus"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Iron Chef, Nov 8th, 2007 @ 10:54pm

    Meaningless, like chasing the wind...

    The only questions I have are:

    Who had the guts to go to market with it?
    Is that worthless?

    Read my previous posts.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    boomhauer (profile), Nov 8th, 2007 @ 11:31pm

    Re: Re: First is First

    yes, and that cost includes damage to your reputation due to loss in stock value etc from having long-term unsettled disputes..

    lawyers are the new terrorists. none of this should be happening in a free country.

    It still blows my mind that the patent system put in place to give the small inventor a fighting change against large established competitors is the same one being used for exactly the opposite today. Deep pockets abuse the system to prevent any small startups from having a chance. But it is all because the patent system allows it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Dave Beck, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 3:55am

    What about the "Others"?

    Now that Vonage has settled with the patent bearing telcos they should be set to take the market completely. The telco offerings are cheap (and worth every penny) but featureless. The "Other" VoIP operators haven't settled with the patent owners and will get screwed if they make any money or any headway in market share. This leaves Vonage with the only long term product which does more than make cheap calls. Look at the feature list that comes with the basic package. They could double the price (there's no competition) and it would still be a good deal to me.

    Disclaimer- I've been a happy Vonage customer since Aug 2005. As an example, I use the forwarding options to ring all of my US and UK mobiles and desk phones, I answer the one I can get to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Scott Horvath, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 4:40am

    Thank You Vonage.

    The silver lining to this whole VoIP patent tussle is that Vonage did what others couldn't...package a solid VoIP product for the mass market, packed full of features, for less than half the price of a typical land line service like Verizon. As Verizon, AT&T, etc starting perking up and taking notice that this small company is eating away at the profits they "could've" been making, they sued them. But they also started to compete and push out their own VoIP offerings at relatively comparable prices. Although Vonage has been sued to oblivion, they've certainly forced the market to compete. If Vonage survives this cash-carnage, all of the existing VoIP services will continue to compete and be forced to innovate.

    So, thank you Vonage for doing what no one else could do...forcing cash-hungry telcos to realize that their "the customer doesn't have a choice" business model no longer works and to make them actually have to compete. The underdog always reshapes the competitive landscape.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Qwest, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 4:58am

    Re: What about the "Others"?

    Well...Qwest has not had their shot at Vonage yet...I think we have at least one or two more patent trolls to deal with before Vonage can set back and relax.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 5:23am

    "Anyone Else Want To Squeeze Free Money...." a bad analysis; it's not free since you need to invest a lot in a legal effort in oder to overcome the barrier to enty into the rip off business - so it's a standard American business.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Overcast, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 6:34am

    Spin it how you want AT&T you still win the 'you fail' award.

    I'm just glad I don't have AT&T.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    _Jon, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 6:45am

    "Might as well sue while Vonage's wallet is wide open..."

    I don't think their "wallet" is the only thing wide open.
    They might want to see a specialist about that anal leakage.

    But I agree with the above comment that Vonage has survived just about every financial / patent hit and still has funding. If they (and their investors) are willing to make that kind of 'up front' payment, they must see a huge potential for payoff by staying in the market. Perhaps they could spin it as 'buying a piece of the infrastructure'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Chronno S. Trigger, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 6:51am

    Re: Thank You Vonage.

    This is not a victory for anyone but the telcos. Once Vonage is gone they'll go back to being the big dog on the block that douse nothing but sit on the porch.

    Vonage wasn't trying to rip anyone off, when was the last time you could say that about any of the telcos? When I first got vonage I was paying $14.99 a month, exactly what they advertised. That price didn't rise until after Verizon forced the universal service fund onto them. I even got an E-Mail from Vonage explaining why that was added. The price went up again after Verizon sued.

    Verizon only offers their VoIP service to those who have their FiOS. I know nothing about Sprint's or AT&T's, probably similar limitations.

    So, taking all this into account, how will this cause anyone to compete?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    dianne, Nov 13th, 2007 @ 1:47pm

    sue vonage

    Yes, I would certainly like to sue Vonage.
    I returned their equipment,told them I couldn't use the service.
    I was charged over $477.00. Had to cancel my credit card.
    I never used their service one day!
    I've spoken to 20 "Supervisors". None of whom speak English.
    They are even charging me for the equipment I returned!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Rob, Jan 8th, 2009 @ 5:02pm

    Make Money

    MAKE $50000 IN A MONTH!!! Take 5 minutes to read

    Take five minutes to read this and it WILL change your life.

    I just read an article in an internet newsgroup describing how to make
    $50,000.00 in only one month from a $5.00 investment.
    Of course I thought this was ridiculous, or some type of pyramid. I
    talked it over with my family, an attorney, and my friends, and they
    all agreed it was some sort of scam. I hate scams because usually
    someone gets burned, and I didn't want it to be me! I blew it off for
    a few weeks then saw another one in a newsgroup I go a lot and
    thought, " maybe this is legitimate", besides whats $5.00 , I spend
    more than that in the morning on my way to work on coffee and cigs for
    the day!
    Well, two weeks later, I began receiving money in the mail!, I
    couldn't believe it!
    Not just a little, I mean big bucks!!. At first only a few hundred
    dollars, then a week later a couple of thousand, then BOOM., By the
    end of the fourth week, I had received nearly $47,000.00. It came from
    all over the world. And every bit of it perfectly legal and on the up
    and up. I've been able to pay off all my bills and still had enough
    left over for a nice vacation for me and my family.
    Not only does it work for me, it works for other folks as well. Marcus
    Valppu says he made $57,883 in four weeks, Dave Manning claims he made
    $53,664 in the same amount of time. Dan Shepstone says it was only
    $17,000.00 for him. Do I know these
    Folks?. No, but when I read how they say they did it, it made sense to
    me. Enough sense that I'm taking a similar chance with $5 of my own
    money. Not a big chance, I admit-but one with incredible potential,
    because $5 is all anyone ever invests in this system. Period. That's
    all Markus, Dave or Dan invested, yet their $5 netted them tens of
    thousands of dollars each, in a safe, legal and completely legitimate
    way. Here's how it works in 3 easy steps:

    STEP 1.

    Invest your $5 by writing your name and address on five separate
    pieces of paper along with the words, " PLEASE ADD ME TO YOUR MAILING
    LIST".
    (In this way, you're not just sending a dollar to someone; you're
    paying for a legitimate service). Fold a $1 dollar bill, money order,
    or bank note inside each paper, and mail them by standard U.S. Mail to
    the following five addressees:

    1) Marco Monet
    409 NE 107 St
    Miami Fl 33161

    2) Alain Renaud
    2638 Augustin Cantin
    Montreal QC Canada
    H3K 1E1

    3) J.R. Arnold
    14777 Wunderlich Dr. 2212
    Houston, Texas 77069

    4) Leila Khalil
    309 E Rand Rd 302
    Arlington Heights IL 60004

    5) Robert del Rosario
    3313 Ashby Field Avenue
    North Las Vegas, Nevada 89031

    Step 2.
    Now remove the top name from the list, and move the other names up.
    This way , #5 becomes #4 and so on. Put your name in as the fifth one
    on the list.

    Step 3.
    Post the article to at least 200 newsgroups. There are at least 17000
    newsgroups at any given moment in time. Try posting to as many
    newsgroups as you can. Remember the more groups you post to, the more
    people will see your article and send you cash!

    Step 4.
    You are now in business for yourself, and should start seeing returns
    within 7 to 14 days!!. Remember, the internet is new and huge!. There
    is no way you can loose.

    Now here is how and why this system works:

    Out of every block of 200 posts I made, I got back 5 responces.
    Yes, that's right. Only 5. You make $5.00 in cash, not checks or money
    orders, but real cash with your name at #5.
    Each additional person who sent you $1.00 now also makes 200
    additional postings with your name at #4, 1000 postings. On average
    then, 50 people will send you $1.00 with your name at #4, ... $50.00 in
    your pocket!!

    Now these 50 new people will make 200 postings with your name at #3 or
    10,000 postings. Average return, 500 people = $500., they make 200
    postings with your name at #2 = 100,00 postings = 5000 returns at
    $1.00 each that's
    $5,000.00 in cash!!

    Finally, 5,000 people make 200 postings each with your name at #1 and
    you get a return of $50,000 before your name drops off the list. And
    that's only
    If everyone down the line makes only 200 postings each! Your total
    income for this one cycle is $55,000.00

    >From time to time when you see your name is no longer on the list, you

    take the latest posting you can find and start all over again.

    So that's it. Pretty simple sounding stuff, huh? But believe me it
    works!
    There are millions of people surfing the net everyday, all day, all
    over the world. And 100,000 new people get on the net every day. You
    know it, you've seen the stories in the papers. So, my friend, read
    and follow the simple instructions and play fair. That's the key, and
    that's all there is to it.
    Print this out right now so you can refer back to this article easily.
    Try to keep an eye on all the postings you made to make sure everyone
    is playing fairly. You know where your name should be.

    Note: Keep in mind that this has been circulating for over a year, so do not be surprised if some of the addresses are outdated…It won’t matter, because you KNOW your address is correct and since you are starting the process again, all the addresses added by the others will be fresh !!

    REMEMBER.... HONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY. YOU DON'T NEED TO CHEAT THE BASIC IDEA TO MAKE MONEY!
    GOOD LUCK TO ALL, AND PLEASE PLAY FAIR AND YOU WILL WIN
    AND MAKE SOME REAL INSTANT FREE CASH!!

    Remember "What Goes Around, Comes Around"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    unknown, Sep 6th, 2011 @ 12:45am

    vonage sucks

    Vonage I am suing them for 600 billion tomorrow for over charging not cancelling my service when asked horrible phone service I am a billionaire and I will be putting this company to Shit

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    unknown, Sep 6th, 2011 @ 12:45am

    vonage sucks

    Vonage I am suing them for 600 billion tomorrow for over charging not cancelling my service when asked horrible phone service I am a billionaire and I will be putting this company to Shit

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    unknown, Sep 6th, 2011 @ 12:45am

    vonage sucks

    Vonage I am suing them for 600 billion tomorrow for over charging not cancelling my service when asked horrible phone service I am a billionaire and I will be putting this company to Shit

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    unknown, Sep 6th, 2011 @ 12:45am

    vonage sucks

    Vonage I am suing them for 600 billion tomorrow for over charging not cancelling my service when asked horrible phone service I am a billionaire and I will be putting this company to Shit

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    unknown, Sep 6th, 2011 @ 12:46am

    vonage sucks

    Vonage I am suing them for 600 billion tomorrow for over charging not cancelling my service when asked horrible phone service I am a billionaire and I will be putting this company to Shit

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    unknown, Sep 6th, 2011 @ 12:46am

    vonage sucks

    Vonage I am suing them for 600 billion tomorrow for over charging not cancelling my service when asked horrible phone service I am a billionaire and I will be putting this company to Shit

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This