RSS
Why OpenSocial Is Unlikely To Dethrone Facebook
from the where's-the-networking? dept
The announcement of Google's new OpenSocial API has generated a blizzard of commentary around the blogosphere. Yesterday Mike argued that it was a smart move on Google's part because it creates a broader web platform that will be more attractive than any one social network could be by itself. However, the various news reports I've read suggest that OpenSocial is missing probably the most important element of a social networking site: the networking. Most people don't join Facebook because they want to use the latest Facebook widget. They join because that's where their friends are, and because it offers basic functionality like messages and photos. Widgets are just icing on the cake.
The fundamental problem facing Orkut, Friendster, LinkedIn and the other social-networking also-rans is that people don't want to sign onto a dozen different social networking sites to keep up with all their friends. They want to sign up with a single site and see updates for all their friends in one place. As long as each social networking site is a walled garden, only allowing users to connect with other users on the same site, the largest sites will have a huge advantage because people will naturally gravitate to the site most of their friends use. On the other hand, if several sites found a way to interoperate, so that Friendster users could be friends with Orkut, MySpace, and LinkedIn users, less popular sites would be at a much smaller disadvantage.
Of course, achieving that sort of data sharing is much more difficult than simply agreeing on a common architecture for third-party widgets. Privacy would be a big concern, and it would be a lot of work to find a set of data formats that can gracefully accommodate the wide variety of information handled by different social networking sites. But achieving such interoperability would be a far more significant threat to Facebook than the features Google appears to be rolling out today. LiveJournal founder and Google employee Brad Fitzpatrick wrote in August about what an open social networking platform would look like. Let's hope he's hard at work making sure that OpenSocial 2.0 is focused on enabling the type of interoperability he describes in that essay.
7 Comments | Leave a Comment..
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- How Being More Open, Human And Awesome Can Save Anyone Worried About Making Money In Entertainment
- If Google Is Serious About Reforming Patent Mess, It Should Make A Bold Statement And Stop Using Motorola Patents To Demand Cash
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- White House Petition Demands TPP Process Be Open & Transparent
- Can Reddit Write Legislation, Too? Proposes The 'Free Internet Act'
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
and they just got myspace
http://google.blognewschannel.com/archives/2007/11/01/google-drops-the-bomb-myspace-joi ns-the-fight/
game... set... match...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
So, you are right, there are two distinct things going on:
-any app on any network (they are calling them "containers")
-friending across networks
Once a 3rd party app has enough users, (a great example is Slide.com's TopFreinds app), it could become it's own container.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What about myspace
So, there is something else other than the number of users that contributes to the rise of a social network. Google is betting that the something else is third party apps.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about myspace
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
OpenSocial
Simply put people will go, use, share the social network that offers them the best experience. They will tell their friends 'hey if we want to do this together or as a group, x network does this better'.
This is where groups can move across social networks. For this experience better applications will be a factor, in the end each social network is an application that lets you do something (network) on it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment