What Else Can We Blame On Facebook? How About Helping The Mob?

from the any-other-conspiracy-theories dept

Constantine von Hoffman has been doing a nice job tracking both how security firms are blaming Facebook (or any other popular social network) for just about anything, but also how the press keeps falling for it. His latest find is to trash an Australian news organization for writing up a whole article on how Facebook, Linkedin and MySpace are popular feeding grounds for organized criminals without bothering to talk to a single other source than a security firm who has a vested interest in generating headlines and making people worried about security. As Constantine notes, he has no reason to doubt that the claim true, but it seems like the press should at least look for a second, less biased, source for confirmation.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Mike F.M, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 12:05am

    But they won't

    They won't look for "a second, less biased, source for confirmation" because it might not make a good a story.

    It's not as dramatic if you have the other side of the story saying that it's all rubbish. It makes it a more reliable article, true, but won't sell as many.

    The main problem is that as people look to these sources for reliable news and information, and trust them to deliver, they are less likely to question the information.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Mitch Graves, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 1:27am

    Surely no one is surprised the media would do this?
    The media puts the worst possible spin on everything except immorality.
    They won't give the hundreds of top scientists who can disprove humans cause global warming the time of day. When the big hoax was acid rain they ignored all the science for a decade until 60 Minutes shocked trhe world by calling it a hoax.
    The media goes out of it's way to put the worst possible spin on everything and when they touch something the leftists like the libs are just amazed at the dishonesty of the media. It's really funny.
    Too bad the libs are not honest enough to read Accuracy in Media or mediaresearch.org. That much truth might kill them! LOL

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    R Chapman, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 2:52am

    Re:

    I entirely agree with your sentiments regarding the media, but acid rain a hoax?? please see the wiki entry regarding this,

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_rain.

    also, your claim of 'hundreds' of scientists saying that mankind is not having an affect on the environment, yet thousands of scientists claim we are....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Media Hype

    If it is written, it must be true.

    This is still believed by millions of people each day.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Wolff000, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 5:42am

    No News Is Good News

    I love how people rant about liberal media. Last I checked one of the main news sources in the US was so slanted to the "conservative" side that some politicians refuse to even interview or give a comment. I don't like any of the news organizations since they all do the spin thing. People should think for themselves and do their own research not believe what they read or hear from any one news source. No one has the whole story or an unbiased opinion anymore.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 5:57am

    Listen up Of course we are having an effect there we have that stupid stuff out of the way now get off you silly agenda and look at the reality. The argument is not if we are having an effect it is how much....Duh !!!!!
    Not nearly the effect the radical environmentalists want us to believe. Did you know that bio-diesel causes more damage to atmosphere ("The green house affect") then petroleum based diesel... Nitrogen oxide ring a bell anywhere ..... Don't be a dupe think and learn before making even bigger mistakes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 5:59am

    Re: Re:


    also, your claim of 'hundreds' of scientists saying that mankind is not having an affect on the environment, yet thousands of scientists claim we are....


    That's not undeniable evidence. Being in the minority in a scientific theory does not guarantee said theory is false...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Danny, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 6:12am

    Re: No News Is Good News

    Doing your own reasearch, while probably the most effective method of looking for news, is difficult at best. I'm still trying to find a good set of news sources but like you say it is so hard to find one without political slant. For now I just try to pull hard facts from mainstream sites like CNN and Fox News.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased), Oct 26th, 2007 @ 6:23am

    Re: Re:

    Yeah, acid rain exists. In Canada, where they mine nickel for Toyota Prius batteries, the land is scorched from acid rain. Take that greenies!
    The thousands of scientists only mention man may be a cause of global warming in their papers so they can still get funding to do their research. Hoax indeed!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Dave Vick, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 6:25am

    Re: Re:

    I can't believe you used a wikipedia article as an argument for the truth about something....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased), Oct 26th, 2007 @ 6:27am

    Re:

    Yeah! What is wrong with CO2? I thought plants love that stuff. Yet it is the thing they are fighting to control the most...and the most pointless.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased), Oct 26th, 2007 @ 6:31am

    Re: No News Is Good News

    Oh my! There is one conservative news source! At least give the conservatives one thing to watch instead of the rest of the liberal slanted news sources out there. I love how liberals hate an actual argument.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Sambamamma, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 6:34am

    Mitch is Inhaling Too Much Exhaust.

    "They won't give the hundreds of top scientists who can disprove humans cause global warming the time of day."

    What are you an SUV salesman??? You actually are right though, it's not people, it's factories, automobiles, cattle, and the like.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Dylan, Oct 26th, 2007 @ 7:28am

    Hmmmm.....

    Maybe what we need to do is give the news companies an ultimatum and tell them that unless they start reporting honest and unbiased news we will just ignore them (not quite sure how well that will work), but In any event we just need to recognize the fact that the media is lying to us and take action. Either that, or just start getting out news from the onion.com, America’s Finest News Source!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    KAZ (profile), Oct 26th, 2007 @ 7:56am

    Re: Re: Re:

    It is even more foolish to fall for the anti-wikipedia propoganda as the anti-facebook.

    Wikipedia is already the best single source of information in (human) existence. The complaint that "anyone can edit it" speaks to a gross ignorance of how it works.

    It also ignores the fact that the /problem/ with most information sources is that a more monolithic entity edits them. Each other source, ultimately, is irresponsible, speaking only to the agenda of its controller.

    In any significant article on wikipedia, ONLY well-sourced information will survive for any length of time, regardless of the agenda of its author. But, likewise, any truth that someone decides to add cannot easily be kept out. As long as they can footnote it correctly, it will likely end up remaining.

    The reason that mainstream media and academia attack it is that they HATE the idea of information that they cannot censor and control.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  

    What Else Can We Blame On Facebook

    Facebook.com, Myspace.com, Youtube.com, Linkedin.com are the new darlings of the internet and it would be absurd if they didn't get their own shares of trashy and negative publicity from the jealous media.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Just Wondering, Oct 30th, 2007 @ 8:15am

    Re: Re:

    Thosands of scientists claim global warming is caused by humans. Millions of people claim Jesus is God. At one time, anyone who said the world revolved around the sun was laughed at. Do the number of voices really prove a point?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This