How Far Are We Away From Teleportation?

never

no, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 7:58pm

Teleportation will never succeed for the simple fact that you can not transport all of these atoms in a human. You can scan them and duplicate them elsewhere, but you can not actually take one that is here and make it appear on the other side of the planet. So once you create a duplicate of the person elsewhere, you have to address the original. I suppose you'll have to find a painless way to destroy it.

And of course, then you have the decay as each transport causes each copy to become less and less perfect; deviating off from the original until cancer, retardation or any other number of disasters set in.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Awesome Mr Ethan, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 8:05pm

No no no, teleportation is totally possible and I'm sure it will happen in my lifetime. As soon as we build a feasible time traveling machine, all we have to do is go into the future and fetch it back. There's almost no science involved in that whatsoever.

Donating money to a time-traveling device research fund could relate to almost anything; you could say you were donating to a charity that would at some point be able to find a cure for cancer.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Oh well

Thor, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 8:09pm

I guess we'll just have to use personal hyperspace generators instead. How close are we to that?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 8:16pm

plus, you know, even though you are creating a new person identical to the original, you're kinda murdering the original person in the process. like in the movie, the prestige.

i mean, it would take a lot of balls to step into that hypothetical teleportation machine knowing that you were going to be incinerated while some shmuck that doesn't even exist yet is going to get all your memories, your looks, get to bang your wife, AND get to go where YOU wanted to go.

count me out. i didn't want to see endor that bad anyway.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Physics

Anonymous Coward, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 8:35pm

Teleportation shouldn't even be possible. If you teleport a rock 10 m up into the air, then that rock has potential energy (from falling) that it ddn't have before. You've essentially created energy, which violates the law of conservation.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

Anonymous Coward, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 8:45pm

You have not created energy, as energy was expended to teleport the rock that distance. If teleportation is possible it will most likely take a huge amount of energy to accomplish, so any energy gained based on freshman physics Potential energy = mgh is basically moot

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

go learn something

Anonymous Coward, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 8:57pm

don't talk. any of you. your making everyone who reads your posts know less. you are not informed on what quantum entanglement is. not a single atom is transfered in teleportation. it involves photons and spin (most importantly electron spin), not moving particles.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: go learn something

Xiphos, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 9:30pm

And I suppose you do? Care to explain what any of this has to do with the angular momentum of an electron or electromagnetic wavepackets?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 10:09pm

I read timeline, I know what I'm talking about.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 10:26pm

The only real thing that concerns me is that "He states that the 'teleported person would end up slightly different, but not in a biologically important way.'" So what is deemed biologically important? Functions needed to survive and operate properly, right? Well what if my teleported-self has major personality disorders that I never possessed due to a missing atom somewhere or some such disaster? That concerns me before any of the other immediate possibilities.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: never

td1138, Oct 12th, 2007 @ 11:01pm

>>Teleportation will never succeed...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 12:20am

WRONG!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

chris, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 2:00am

Considering we are just a configuration of energy all that would be required for teleportation to be possible is for there to be a way to break down that energy, trasnmit it to the desired location, and reassemble it instantaniously. To do so however would probably require a gigantic amount of energy that would require more resources than practicaly available for any type of travel except inter-galatic, so don't get your hopes up for ever seeing its fruition. In all reality reaching the speed of light is much simpler.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Jesus Christ Dennis

Shohat, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 2:59am

For that kind of bullshit post, you would be crucified on Slashdot.
I mean WTF ?!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

mark, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 3:15am

I have incontrovertible proof that teleportation is possible. The only problem is a limited number of destinations.
Step one: Climb the fence into an electrical substation with the warning not to climb the fence. Step two: reach up and touch something the signs say you'll die if you touch them.
Instant teleportation! The matter left behind isn't expectly human in appearance nor aroma, but there has yet to be anyone return to claim it.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: never

Peet McKimmie (profile), Oct 13th, 2007 @ 3:41am

Even if teleportation = duplication it can still be a useful process, for example in the quick populating of distant planets: the same "team" could populate thousands of planets with no problems as the resultant "transporter clones" could never physically meet the originals or any of the other duplicates. ;-)

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Dwale, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 3:46am

obviously this is not real teleportation described here. this is a process wherin the original person would be destroyed (murdered as their body was vaporized) then a new, imperfect copy of their body would be created elsewhere at a new location by rearranging molecules in the environment at the subatomic level.
But would the new person have memories and personality same as the original? what is a person? is there a soul? if you believe this then teleportation would never ever work in this way unless you could teleport the nonphysical essence of a life as well.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

1028 atoms?

hello, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 3:59am

i thought we were made up of slightly more atoms than that.. Like 3000 or somthing.. I could be wrong though

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

But this could be used for other uses.

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 4:07am

Imagine being able to manipulate one atoms quantum state on earth, and have another receive the changes on another planet. Near Instantly. Connect that up t a pair of computer systems and use it instead of radio communication. Unlike the radio, there's no lag time. Direct communication between planets in near real time. Sod transportation, look at simple communciation.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

I'll settle for genuinely immersive telepresence

zcat, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 4:26am

If we can find a way to use quantum entanglement for high-bandwidth zero latency communication, we could work on genuine telepresence. Either by people meeting in a virtual world, or by one person controlling a physical 'avatar' or robotic clone of themselves at a remote location and immediately experiencing everything the avatar experiences.

That would be just as good as teleportation, without all that messy transfer of your mass times c^2 amounts of energy which teleportation is usually expected to require..

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

First steps in teleportation.

PT, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 4:36am

I think the very first steps of teleportation is in communications or data transport. Can you imagine, for a moment, being able to instantly send command signals to a space probe millions of kilometers away and get instant feedback? Instant images and data returned for analysis, and so forth? On earth, instant communication to anywhere on the globe with almost no latency. No landlines and fiber optics to worry about. Instant teleport of whatever data you want, whenever you want. Yes, a whole new set of problems will result from this, but we'll cross that bridge when we get there. I'm just excited to finally realize we may be inching closer to real instant communications.

Then once we have that down practically, maybe the next step is true wireless power transmission. Space based power generation (such as huge solar panels maybe?) delivering wireless power to earth? Maybe a designated location for all of a nation's nuclear power generation and teleport the energy needs to where it's needed? Powering a space probe remotely so it never runs out of "fuel"? Lot's of possibilities if the science is possible.

Finally a workable transport mechanism to send things and ourselves anywhere. Faster than light travel in the purest sense.

Exciting times, if the science can prove all this possible, let alone practical.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Old article, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 5:46am

It's on topic but quite dated, from 1995, an old link I saved: http://wired-vig.wired.com/wired/archive/3.11/krauss_pr.html

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

It's been done...

Simon, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 5:55am

... I read it in a science journal. Go look it up yourself, the journal is called Calvin and Hobbes.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

advanced technology

Supreme Commander Thor, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 6:02am

The human race is not mature enough to deal with such advanced technologies as teleportation and personal hyperspace generators. We will continue to observe. We will continue to spoil your ill-advised experiments.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

GRX, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:10am

Yeah, there is no way in hell that teleportation could ever be possible. Next you'll be trying to convince me that man will invent some kinda fancy flying machine that can go through the air like a bird.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Teleportation

Phil, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:23am

Your comments on teleportation (How Far Are We Away From Teleportation?)sort of borders on my thoughts that time travel and teleportation are almost one and the same.

I feel if more people felt this way, we might achieve the final goal.

Phil

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:25am

im not a scientist but im positive teleportation can done for inanimate objects.

i really doubt living beings can be teleported though.

the sum of the composing elements in a living being is not all that makes that being.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: 1028 atoms?

Michael, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:49am

He meant 10^28 atoms...as in the number 10 followed by 28 zeros. Slightly more than 3000 atoms.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

.....

Grandfather Time, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:11am

Now, where did I put that sandwich?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:28am

Teleportation will never happen, because, by the time the inventors and entrepreneurs get around to creating it, someone else will have patented it and will be sitting on the patent waiting for them to monetize it.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

The Religious Factor

Anonymous, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:40am

I don't forsee this happening in my lifetime because many people believe in this "spirit" or other essense that they feel couldn't possibly be transferred with the physical state. Combine that with OPEC's need for us to be reliant on Oil/Gas and Car companies needing for us to be reliant on cars.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Portal on the Mind?

Noah Callaway, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:22am

I think someone's been playing too much Portal.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Welcome to the Aperture Science Enrichment Center.

Mr. Stanley Russell Dudek, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:32am

THE CAKE IS A LIE!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

hmm

JS Beckerist (profile), Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:40am

I hope, if they exist, it can transport souls too...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Wolf0579, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:47am

It seems that we humans have a very good track record for being able to build whatever we can conceive. It may take some time, but one thing we should not do, is say "never". (It's a real long time, folks!) Just take a look at the last hundred years and how we've gone from horse and buggy to going to the moon and the planets! You nay-sayers out there are being short-sighted.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:51am

That's like 4000 atoms at least, there's no way they could be duplicated accurately.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

wolf0579, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:57am

And the number of atoms (for you folks that are math challenged) is 10 to the 24th power. Ten with 24 zeros behind it. (A bit more than 4000.)

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 10:09am

I'm no expert. But isn't it impossible for it to truly be instantaneous? Well, unless we figure out how to transfer the information of these atoms faster than the speed of light. So the transfer time between two distant planets would still be limited by the speed the information is transfered?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

I predict teleportation will become commonplace

Neal, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 10:20am

unfortunately all that will be teleported is money, and it will only move from investor's pockets to charlatan's.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: never

DNeoMatrix, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 11:29am

Not true.... The actual teleportation that they are talking about actually destroys the original atom in the process of teleporting it, so that destruction will be what handles you're ... deletion of the original. The biggest problem I guess is getting all the atoms to link together in the same bonds as before the teleporation. Teleporting the atoms and getting them to be built up together are two different things.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 11:52am

Everything is possible .. USe your imagination ..

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Didn't Einstein say...

Douglas, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 12:00pm

Wasn't Einstein who said that whoever thinks of the question could never develop an answer, for the answer needs a new way of thinking? That being said, I think it is obvious that this can and will happen, however not in our lifetimes.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Sephiroth, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 12:00pm

First thing. How do you expect a machine to simply stack a bunch of atoms together, with a minimal error?? Until now we havent been able to create a living form using atom "bricks", and you are already thinking in putting a machine somewhere so that it would grab amounts of atoms near it and reassemble them...yeah, energy is an issue...and what do you mean about destroying the original thing, simply obliging every atom to split?? Wouldnt that be stupid, and very hard to achieve (energy again, or burn him ^^). As we are getting closer to a quantum computer, instant communication is possible. And thats the only thing im sure, instant communication, using electron and other particles spin to communicate is being studied with enthusiasm.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 12:06pm

The problem with opening up serious topics to public comment is that people with no knowledge and nothing to say still feel compelled to speak.

In reading the commentary in this article I can really see the validity of that statement.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: never

Jn, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 2:02pm

If you read the above, the transmission process destroys the original, so you don't have to worry about the painless disposal issue you mentioned.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 2:45pm

I won't be first to try that ride... you'll wind up as a pool of 4000 atoms and looking like pile of drooling ape shit. Well maybe a pile of ape shit has slightly more than 4000 atoms, for the mathematically inclined maybe more like 10^12.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleportation

Fred, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 2:59pm

I just teleported. Proof that it's possible!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Doubt it could ever be done!

Peter Thomas, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 4:33pm

To teleport would require just about all the energy ever produced by this planet. One heck of an electricity bill.

Also, you have to have a computer that 'remembers' where every single one of those 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms is at the time of capture, plus the direction they were travelling in. Hmm.

What kind of scanning device would do that? You'd need one hell of a RAID cluster of hard drives, and something that offers considerably more than 4,800 dpi resolution :-)

Let's stick to something easier, like time travel, invisibility or X ray specs...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

General Eskimo, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 4:48pm

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Put SPOILER WARNINGS there

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

For all the idiots who seem to think teleportation

Grobbendonk, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 5:03pm

Please, do the basic reading. Not on teleportation, but on information theory.

In order to teleport a living, self-aware, animate object (such as a human), you need to be able to transmit enough information to preserve the objects consciousness.

Transmitting a body might be ok - as long as you can do things like keep all the iron atoms located in the right place in the heamoglobin, it would probably be enough to keep the body alive.

But to transmit a human mind, you would need to be able to carry (at least) the exact position and momentum of every electon, proton, neutron and every other particle in the brain.

This is explicitly ruled out by Heisenbergs uncertainty principle.

Also, as Peter Thomas points out, atomic teleportation requires so much energy (without even considering the cost of assembling your particles back into something more advanced than elemental mush), it's just not wortht.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Stick to something you know about

jack, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 5:37pm

There's way too much misinformation on teleportation. Real teleportation is about transmitting information in the form of quantum observeables. There's a little physical fact called the "no cloning theorem" which states that you can't reproduce the entire quantum state of any unknown state (say that of an atom), let alone every atom in your body. And then there's the uncertainty priciple, which states you can't know an entire quantum state without changing it (so it's no longer in that state). So Trekies, name your poison!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:06pm

I am stupider for having read your posts. Please, go back to Everquest. It's safe there.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Looks like you're right

Talon, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:11pm

Thank goodness we have people who can imagine the possibilities, left to a lot of people in this thread who have already decided it could not happen, it is assured to never happen.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:20pm

Given that legitimate Physicists are actually trying to make this happen. I tend to believe in the possibility. I would poll this group for how many actual Physicists are posting here but based on the usernames with each post (yes including mine) There is no need.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: 1028 atoms?

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:28pm

Actually it would be 1 followed by 28 zeros (10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms).

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Welcome to the Aperture Science Enrichment Cen

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:29pm

I ate the cake. It was tasty.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: 1028 atoms?

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:47pm

Your an idiot. its 10^28 which is

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 7:51pm

You obviously know nothing about math...

10^28 = 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 = 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Does 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 sound the same as 4000?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: Teleportation

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:13pm

Think about it: any kind of travel, is time-travel. It takes you time to travel.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: hmm

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:14pm

Durr...Durr...Durr...Durr...Durr...Durr...Durr...Durr...Durr.

Durka Durka.

Blah.

Roughly translated, the above seems to imply you're a complete moron. Apparently, it was an attempt to speak your native language, "Retard".

Unfortunately, we can't all be as stupid as you.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:15pm

Ouch. The Stupid. It Burns!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleportation

Phillip Woon, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:24pm

No, they have it all wrong. They're not going to get anywhere by trying to teleport the atoms of objects. We need to create a wormhole between the two points.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:32pm

beam me up scotty.... what???? fine i'll take the ladder

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 8:50pm

You physicists are so finicky.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

PT, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:45pm

"the sum of the composing elements in a living being is not all that makes that being."

What else is part of the composition of a living being?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

PT, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 9:49pm

Psssshh. Don't you realize that all one has to do is infringe on the patent by creating the devices then teleport the "IP Troll's" legal department to the farside of the moon. Presto, no lawsuit because the Trolls are too busy replacing their legal department every few days.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Impossible Things in History

Ray Jenson, Oct 13th, 2007 @ 11:25pm

In the late 1700's, it was said to be impossible for a vehicle to propel itself. Something else, such as a person, the wind, or a horse, had to make it go. When steam locomotion became a reality a short time later (1804), that impossibility was realized. Apparently, nobody told George Stephenson.

People in the 1850's said black people would never be free. Tell that to Rosa Parks.

In the 1860's, someone mentioned in a newspaper (I forget which) that someone has asked why trains ran on a railroad track, and found the question absurd enough to run an editorial about people using their brains before writing a letter to the newspaper's advice column, and that steering a locomotive at 30 miles per hour would never be practical because of the weight ratios involved. The horseless carriage was invented in 1873 in Racine, Wisconsin.

In the 1870's, most people considered the dream of human flight to be impossible. Let's not tell the Wright Brothers, who flew the first powered flight in December of 1903.

In the 1900's, it was said that radio would never reach a national audience.

In the 1920's, the idea of transmitting pictures over a radio signal was positively absurd. Television was demonstrated in 1935, and RCA developed the first color television in 1941. HDTV was considered impossible in 1960 because digital signal compression technology hadn't been invented yet. Today there is a television in every home.

In the 1940's, it was said that computers would never be practical for the average Fortune 500 company. In 1960, it was said that only the largest companies would ever be able to own a computer. In the 1970's, it was considered impractical to have a home computer, and networks were never going to be necessary for in-home use... though they might be a playtoy for the filthy rich.

In the 1950's, they said black people would never be a part of polite society, or even hold political office. Tell that to Barack Obama.

In the 1950's, they also said no human could withstand travel at above the speed of sound. In the 1970's, Concorde unveiled its SST passenger jets.

In the 1980's, it was impossible to have an international computer network infrastructure with enough bandwidth to service the whole world. Only businesses and colleges would ever need it anyway.

All of this illustrates two very basic rules:

1) With enough repetition, costs for technology come down.
2) With enough study, the impossible can be made possible, if technically feasible.

The only question in my mind is how long it's going to take us to get there. I doubt it will be in my lifetime.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

Allan, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 12:49am

I believe that is incorrect? The rock has the same energy applied to it, i.e. gravity effects, but when its teleported into the air, the energy is just transformed from potential to kinetic.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Welcome to the Aperture Science Enrichment Cen

Allan, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 12:55am

LOL, such a random post for Portal. I am glad to see the popularity of Portal running amok through tech sites.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

most comments

mike allen, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 1:41am

beam me up scottie no sign of inteligent life here.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

no teleport?

fordpurfect, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 4:29am

Damn, and I wanted to go to Paris for lunch

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

inivex, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 4:57am

If you think about it, there would need to be a device to do the teleportation either my means of moving atoms, or converting existing atoms/molecules. The device would need a power source. This is essentially the same as you dropping a ball. The energy to fall wasn't created, it was converted from food by the device (you) moving the subject (the ball).

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleporting MP3

RIAA, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 6:36am

Please note that teleporting any music is considered a copyright violation despite how badly the reproduction may sound (must be the BitTurbulence).

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: 1028 atoms?

ANON, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 7:03am

THATS 10 TO THE 28 POWER OR 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 X 10 NOT 1028

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: 1028 atoms?

Anonymous Coward, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 7:31am

I heard there are at least a million.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

You'uns is certainly going to get mad at this one

LesterRay, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 8:25am

Are ya'll all a bunch of idiots? You might very well one day move a tea cup from one end of a lab to the other, maybe, butttt....Get real their is no past, it is gone. How can you rationally believe their is a future where you have already done something? Huh? To damn much t.v. Hey, I enjoy a good movie to but get real, you ain't creating a soul and a spirit. Not even with cloning!!!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Surgery

Mark, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 9:19am

I think if it ever was possible, it would be a practical application when conducting organ transplans, getting a new heart fitted without the need to cut someone open. Hmm, i wouldnt want someone swapping my heart around while walking around London though, we would need some kind of passcode so we could pair ourselves up before swaping organs.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

todd, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 9:21am

Youre not taking into account how much energy it takes to transport the rock into the air.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 9:29am

This is the most singly bullshit article ive ever seen on techdirt.

Let me summarize it...

Are we any closer to teleportation than we were last time we reported this? No, no we arent. Now im going to pad this out for a whole paragraph, link to old articles with dead links instead of researching them myself and making sure they all still work. And then, to top it off, im going to put a Headline on it that makes people click their RSS feeds.

Goodo, thats 10 mins of my life im never going to get back. All for a little ad revenue.

You sir should be in the stocks.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

Pwner, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 11:14am

You both are morons. Who are you Never to say it'll NEVER succeed. Maybe there won't be any copying, just transportaion. On top of that Mr Ethan, you realize how improbable time travel really is? Too many things would go wrong, and unlike teleportaion, NEVERs dumb comment is actually correct in that instance. Then you would have tons of copies everywhere and who knows if true consciousness would stick with the original copy or be left behind or be simply duplicated.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Think of the military implications

Big O, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 11:16am

Think of the military implications. Highly train one bada$$mofo, duplicate, rinse, repeat

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Two Words

Tin Ear, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 11:42am

Lossy Format.

I wouldn't want to risk teleportation if I were unsure of a 'Hi-Def' re-materialization. Too many parts of me are too important to me to trust to an imperfect transmission...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: never

heard it before, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 11:43am

I guess you've read Crichton's Timeline..

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: You'uns is certainly going to get mad at this

Anonymous Coward, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 11:59am

How do we know souls an spirits acutally do exist? Its all hearsy, "except in the movies".

When scientists discover something it could take them years, decades, or centuries to completely understand it. Not to mention to figure a way to utilize there discovery. I think teleportation may be possible, but they have to fix that whole "teleported person would end up slightly different, but not in a biologically important way." Regardless, I say 50 years minimum before we see any real progress.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

Kyle, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 12:09pm

Quote of the day, haha.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Me of nowhere land, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 12:55pm

Great! They're just forgetting the SOUL. It won't be teletransported because it is not a material stuff (not made of atoms). They would end up with a body without a soul at the destination and a soul without a body at the departure. Translocation is not made that way. Watch "Earth: Final Conflict" series and you gonna get an idea what it must be, a portal connecting two places that lets people or stuff travel between instantaneous (or almost). Technology has been created already some decades ago in America, look for "Montauk Project" ("Stargate" series was losely based on that technology too).

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

spaghettihead, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 1:11pm

I love all that quantum entanglement stuff. I love how we are are amazed by "SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE".

I love thinking about having 'tendencies to behave' and probabilities. As long as we enjoy this discussion, we will evolve.

The more I learn about quantum mechanics and all that good stuff, the more excited I get about the future. We are just beginning to get it.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Death by Teleportation

PRMan, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 2:24pm

I have long thought about writing a short story in my spare time about some scientists creating a teleporter and having it work on inanimate objects, plants and even animals, but with humans they die instantly and the scientists have no idea why.

And of course, in the end it's because they didn't believe that people have souls because they couldn't see them or measure them.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

1028 atoms

hello, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 2:35pm

i may have been only joking when i posted that..

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 3:22pm

"I have long thought about writing a short story in my spare time about some scientists creating a teleporter and having it work on inanimate objects, plants and even animals, but with humans they die instantly and the scientists have no idea why.

And of course, in the end it's because they didn't believe that people have souls because they couldn't see them or measure them."

Sounds about as exciting as watching paint dry, but I'm sure it will be a big hit among the religious fanatics!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Its Magic

STFM, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 4:20pm

Ever read (or seen) the Prestige?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: 1028 atoms?

Warren, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 5:50pm

10 to the 28th power, not 1028, or are you making a joke?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

Joel, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 7:11pm

Potential energy isn't energy (read "potential"). It's a term to describe an object that has the capacity to be acted upon by a force. Therefore, all objects in the universe have potential energy.

Put simply, a rock teleported 10m into the air has a relative momentum of zero. Since that rock is inside Earth's gravity field (assuming the teleportation experiment happened here) it would then be acted upon by the gravitational force wherein the rock would accelerate at 9.81m/s² towards the ground.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

Corbin, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 7:20pm

Ah, yes. if you teleproted a rock 10m into the air it would have potential energy from falling it didnt have before, but you are not creating energy becuase you use energy in the from of electricty(used to power the teleportation device.) to re-locate it there. therefore still follows the law of conservation of energy.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

The Prestige???

cjmemay, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 8:52pm

YOU FORGOT TO SAY SPOILER ALERT! I swear if you just ruined that movie for me, I am going to be so pissed.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: Physics

Anonymous Coward, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 9:32pm

actually the rock would have potential energy from the forces of gravity applied to it when it is in a state of rest pre-teleportation. After you moved the rock to the height, the energy then becomes kinetic due to the same forces of gravity. Thus, there is no energy being created, simply reapplied in the new location.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

Mike Hunt, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 10:01pm

My balls itch, teleport that.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: 1028 atoms?>>pretty sure poster knew this.

Whoa Nelly, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 10:07pm

Holy crap, I can't believe how many people thought they had to correct a JOKE! Pretty sure 'hello' was being silly and pretending to be dumb...I chuckled...you corrected his math. Geeze you anal-retentive humorless armchair physicists need to loosen your collars a little bit. Kinda reminds me of Star Treks Data-all that technical knowledge and still a social retard.

Open a window once in awhile, chat up a bimbo at a bar, or maybe even move out of mom's house ;)

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

How Far Are We Away From Teleportation?

Flash, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 10:13pm

It is just a matter of speed of travel.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: 1028 atoms?

Anonymous Coward, Oct 14th, 2007 @ 10:38pm

Your an idiot. its 10^28 which is 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms

You're an idiot who can't spell "you're" correctly.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: You'uns is certainly going to get mad at t

LesterRay, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 5:01am

http://www.scienceofsouls.com/
The Science of the Soul presents and explains the overwhelming scientific evidence discovered during the last 100 years that leads to the conclusion that each human being has a supernatural soul. The science upon which this is based is mainstream science including biology, quantum physics, and math. It is not based on paranormal occurrences, parapsychology, extrasensory perception, out-of-body experiences, or near-death experiences. The book identifies human capabilities and characteristics that cannot be explained by science as natural phenomenon and which are thus “supernatural” phenomenon. The book does not require an understanding of physics, chemistry, or mathematics and does not include solving any mathematical equations.
The book also examines statements by prominent scientists that are in agreement with the above-described conclusion. These scientists include:

Albert Einstein (developed the theory of relativity and contributed to the development of quantum physics), Charles Darwin (developed the theory of evolution), Stephen Hawking (astrophysicist), Werner Heisenberg (discoverer of the Heisenber uncertainty principle of quantum physics), Niels Bohr (contributed to the development of quantum physics), Erwin Schrödinger (developed the Schrödinger wave equation of quantum physics), William Provine (Cornell University professor of biological science and the history of science), Steven Weinberg (astrophysicist and winner of Nobel Prize), Marvin Minsky (MIT researcher in artificial intelligence), Richard Dawkins (Charles Simonyi professor of the public understanding of science, Oxford University and author of books on evolution), Sir John Eccles (winner of Nobel Prize for brain research), Henry Stapp (physicist at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory of the University of California, Berkeley) and others.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

jeff, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 5:03am

how many of you are teleportation scientists? none. so shut the hell up.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

unbelievable

that guy, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 5:04am

I cannot believe teleportation is being argued in this forum. 99% of you have no idea what you are talking about aside from what you googled about quantum physics (and maybe even newtonian physics: potential energy rock boy - Really? Are you serious?). Before you start discussing the possibility of teleportation, go get your PhD in physics and spend at least a decade collaborating with contemporaries in the field.

Stick to technology techdirters.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Soul research

LesterRay, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 5:05am

How can Google be wrong?
Science of the SOUL, GOOGLED; 37,900,000 HITS
Teleportation, GOOGLED; 1,980,000 HITS
And we all know of Google's reputation and long standing as a useful research tool...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleportation is as old as recorded History

LesterRay, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 5:20am

The whole concept of Teleportation has it's roots in Spiritual realities. This has been documented in one of the most published books in the world and might I also say one of the most read books in the world. This book not only documents the science of the soul but also documents meriads of successful teleportations. It was all God's idea and he holds the patent on it and is the sole proprietor of the working model. Documented in both the Old and New Testament:
Genesis 28:12
Genesis John 1:51
I Thessalonians 4:16 & 17
Revelation 11:12
John 20:19 & 20

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Overcast, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 6:52am

Well, considering most government money is used for kickbacks, wars, gaining control over the masses, corporate welfare, and waisted on other stupid pursuits, like asinine studies about frog sex, I seriously doubt we ever will.

Two big problems:

We have a lot of 'courage' pointing guns at everyone, and jailing them for stuff like smoking pot. But we lack moral courage in a very serious way.

And our technological science far exceeds our moral and ethical ability.

This being the case, mankind's development is pretty well crippled. No about of technological science will fix moral issues. Until humanity comes together I don't see anything like this working.

For if they did invent this - what purpose would it have? To eliminate the need for cars (not if the oil and auto companies have anything to say about it)? To teleport food to starving people? Or to teleport troops and bombs to the enemy?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: go learn something

BTR1701, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 7:11am

> don't talk. any of you. your making everyone
> who reads your posts know less.

That's an awful elitist attitude from someone who apparently doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're".

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

James, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 7:26am

Ahh but if we simply fetch it from the future via a time machine, then that would create a paradox as where did the future versions of ourselves get the technology from? They also would have gone into the future to get it, and the same for those future people and so on until infinity, so that my friend is also impossible as something needs to be invented for it to exist in the future.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

This is all based on assumptions

Kirk, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 7:57am

How can anyone actually be sure about any of this? A lot of science is based on assumptions and best guess.
The original post sounds more like a duplication machine than transporter. Also, why would the original have to be destroyed? Is it just to TRICK us to thinking that the person/thing was transported? More likely, the best way to utilize this bogus technology would be to have such information of scans of food/products in memory, then have them created on demand. Dare I say it, much like Star Trek's replicators.
This stuff was talked about 2 years ago:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/maney/2005-06-14-replicator_x.htm

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

I just want my Jetson's tube travel and flying car

Tube Technology, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 8:10am

Teleportation is fine to study by a small handful of physicists right now - push that technology as fast as we can and another 10-20 years we'll be minimally ahead of where we are at whether 10 study it or 10^28 study it. I'm not saying to stop studying it - just let the few who are devoted to it now continue their work.

Let's put more people to work on that tube travel technology though... now that's something I can get behind and see real potential for in my lifetime. I'd almost give up my dream for a personal flying car if I could just shoot down a tube and get to work.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Needlecast and re-sleeve, not teleport

bmac (profile), Oct 15th, 2007 @ 8:16am

The totality of your mind is stored in a cortical stack that's inserted in utero and stays with you until physical death. The stack records everything that ever happens to you, whether dreaming or awake; it also records every aspect of your mental being, i.e. your personality. The stack can then be inserted into a fresh sleeve (body/clone) when your current sleeve wears out, or can be needlecast across the galaxy to a waiting clone at the remote re-sleeving facility.

So you need to go to Mars: Your sleeve (body) stays here on Earth in hibernation, while you're needlecast to Mars, and downloaded into a loaner sleeve.

The super rich have designer clones waiting in hibernation in case they get killed or seriously disfigured.

Of course, the Catholics are against technology that verges on real immortality, so they sign waivers against re-sleeving and accept real death.

I suggest you read the excellent work by Richard K. Morgan, who has done much research into these matters.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

none at all

me, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 10:31am

I'm more of a wormhole kind of guy. Or Holodeck. We are nearer to transfer atoms to yesterday than moving atoms from this dot "." to this one ".". I'm learning to become a physicist so please don't flame me. But Overcast has the biggest point i read.

And hello dude, maybe you were joking, maybe you weren't, the fact is that you said it and it was a dumb thing to say. You'd rather say something about "souls" than kidding with numbers. Imho.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: never

JoeNoSpam, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 11:18am

"will never succeed"...Huh? It's theoretically possible, and NEVER is a long time.

You say it creates the delimea of a copy? No duh. That's not a big deal.

Then you talk about degradation...there needn't be any. Once this is possible the copy would be created from digital data, and there is no loss of quality/integrity when it comes to digital reproductions.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

JoeNoSpam, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 11:20am

Re..."He states that the 'teleported person would end up slightly different, but not in a biologically important way.'"

That's due to the Hiesenberg (sp?) Uncertainty Principle.

Not to worry..that's why transporters have Hisenberg Compensators.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

Brian, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 12:07pm

Hurry up already...I don't want to wait for overnight shipping for my new Britney Spears CD. This rocks!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Impossible Things in History

Jerk, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 1:42pm

That's great and all, but all your points have one thing in common, they're technically feasible. Quantum teleportation is concerned with the transmission of the information (spin and what not) of photons and atoms, information != matter. Using the present techniques, we'll never see teleportation in the classical sense.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: go learn something

YES!, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 1:44pm

hahaha, that's awesome!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Oct 15th, 2007 @ 1:47pm

Just think of what value teleportation could have for ebay purchases. Googling could be a whole new world...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: go learn something

Boost, Oct 16th, 2007 @ 10:02am

Probably not...I once read a quote that was something along the lines of the fact that no one really understands quantum mechanics. If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you probably know very little about it...or something along those lines. Anyway, folks, the energy levels to acomplish teleportation or creating gravity wells to warp space and send a ship across the cosmos are mind boggeling. And so far advances in nuclear fusion have been very slow and not so steady, so I don't see us generating that sort of erergy any time soon. And just say if we did, I'd really like to meet the person who has the guts to volunteer for that first 'human' test. Let's really stop talking about this, please. Damnit, I can't believe you dragged me into this!
Piss off!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleportation Discussion

D, Nov 9th, 2007 @ 4:54pm

Interesting discussions/arguments taking place here.

I am somewhat in agreement with the poster, Kirk. *Why* does the scanner destroy or disrupt the object/organism that is to be scanned?

Is there no way to come up with a type of scanner that can scan the object/organism without damaging it or disturbing it's current state?

If a non-disruptive/destructive scanner could be designed, built and used then, what should/would be done with the scan subject (original object/individual) once the teleported object/individual were brought into existance?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

DANZA ... lol, Feb 4th, 2008 @ 3:30am

yes but the energy comes from the huge initial burst needed to cause the teleportation remember xDD

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Tesla, Mar 20th, 2008 @ 6:17am

THIS IS NOT TELEPORT, THIS IS a FAX. I am surprised scientists believe in this wrong path..

Real Teleport don't destroy and built things, only MOVES it.
Or better, the thing don't move, is the space/time that is warped. You open a hole (with a strong magnetic field tuned on certain frequency) in the continuum of space/time and all is on it will fall into this "hole" and reappear immediately in another point of space/time. (another hole tuned? this is still a mistery, need experiments..)

This is the REAL teleport.

Legend said that Einstein teleported a ship (Philadelphia Experiment) by sorround them in a magnetic field tuned to the frequency of Earth magnetic field.
Nikola Tesla too is said to have teleported some things in this lab by experimenting on magnetic field.. (probably in the same way of Einstein)

THIS IS THE WAY TO GO AND RESEARCH, in my opinion. (not fax or cloning things..)

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

There doing it now

James Hyslope, Mar 30th, 2008 @ 4:37pm

http://www.dgl.com/itinfo/2002/it020401.html Is this what youguys are talking about.......?? Aaaah, NO it can't happen. Muahahahahaha. Get ready Boyz :) Wait 20 more years.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Predicted in Mayan Calander // Teleportation

James Hyslope, Mar 30th, 2008 @ 4:47pm

This is why I made the web search on this subject yesterday (when I found this possible) Link to video (2 parts) The 2nd video (at the very end of the video)it is mentioned that teleportation would be possible in 2007....so we are a little behind :) *or conversion of calander was a little off (more like it) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8689261981090121097 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-567329528148516232 Remember if in a hurry, just view the last video....last part.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Predicted in Mayan Calander // Teleportation

James Hyslope, Mar 30th, 2008 @ 4:48pm

This is why I made the web search on this subject yesterday (when I found this possible) Link to video (2 parts) The 2nd video (at the very end of the video)it is mentioned that teleportation would be possible in 2007....so we are a little behind :) *or conversion of calander was a little off (more like it) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8689261981090121097 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-567329528148516232 Remember if in a hurry, just view the last video....last part.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleportation/Duplication/Destruction

Cazmatron, May 11th, 2008 @ 5:45pm

Oh yeh! That sounds great...... Create a lesser version of Yourself each Teleport, while You, Yourself die..... Mmmmmmm, much like I have $1000 and give $10 dollars away each day.... until, oops!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Teleportation

Bill Johnston, Jul 10th, 2008 @ 1:12pm

I believe teleportation is possible,laugh if you want, because I believe that I have experienced it.
In the summer of 1962 I called my wife, she was my girlfriend then, who lived half-way across town. She was at home and it was hot outside.
I told her that I would walk. She said it was not wise. I told her that I would be okay.
I stepped outside the front door of my home, blacked out and 1 minute later was in front of her home's front door.
I knocked and she answered.
She believed that I was playing a trick on her and called from the neighbors.
1. The neighbors' homes were too far away for me to get to her house in a minute. and 2. cell phones were not in use at that time.
She said that she had only taken a few seconds to answer may knock at the door.
She will confirm what I have written if you wish to write her at either [email protected] or [email protected]
I know this does not prove it, but she experienced a sudden lapse of time between our calls as I did by my arriving when I did.
It only happened once and never again. How it happened, I do not know.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Jul 17th, 2008 @ 7:08am

Sa-weet :)

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

true

Scientific Notations!, Aug 24th, 2008 @ 6:44pm

Teleportation is posible, for all you critics who say it isnt, well guess what...it is, sure its only a few protons that have been transfered but it could change modern life! just imaging getting super fast data transferrence in computers, we could make quantum computers that could transfer data faster then light itself! there are so many things we could do with teleportation, not just humans... derris ( the author of this topic) has explained that its not exactly for human teleportation, it could be. But the likelyness of it happening is extremely low... but never say never

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

No No No

Liam, Sep 18th, 2008 @ 8:18am

But you aint looking at all the possiblitys .... they are currently researching how to Instant Teleport through wormholes... ever seen stargate, it will be like that.... all they need to do is a device to hold the wormhole in suitable state and to work out that all your bits of body will make it to the other side...

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Teleportation

Anonymous Coward, Sep 18th, 2008 @ 8:20am

You have some crazy dreams mate.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: never

amber, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 9:49pm

what do you know

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re:

jeremy, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 9:54pm

your a big jackass,god!!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: Re: go learn something

Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:00pm

well why dont you shut the fuck up then bitch

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Re: Re: Re: go learn something

jeremy, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:06pm

shut the fuck up bitch

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

dunbassess

jeremy, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:16pm

fuck all you weak ass whores you can all suck a big black dick!! OOOOOH WHAT NOW BITCH DO SOMETHIN DO SOMYHIN NOW huh,huh

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: dunbassess

AMBER, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:20pm

FUCK YOU YOU SUCK ONE

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:21pm

NO YOU SUCK ONE

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:21pm

NO YOU

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

JEREMY, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:22pm

NO YOU

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:22pm

NO YOU DO IT

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:23pm

YOU FIRST BITCH

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

JEREMY, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:25pm

THIS IS THE MOST INTELLIGENT CONVERSATION IV'E EVER HAD

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:26pm

FUCK YOU BITCH ASS HO

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

JEREMY CLUE BT, Sep 30th, 2009 @ 10:35pm

FUCK IT YOU WIN I GIVE UP!! YOU FUCKING BITCH DICKSUCKING FAGIT WHORE FUCK ALL YOU SON OF A WHORES AND SLUTS WITH STANK ASS AND FUNK PUSS HOPE YOUR MOM GETS SCREWED BY A BABY GARRILLA AND AN UGLY KANGAROO.BOOYAHHHHH BITCH TAKE THAT IM OUT!!!!!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

o my

green king, Oct 20th, 2009 @ 1:35pm

well i think were about 20 thousand years away from teleportation

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

o my

green king, Oct 20th, 2009 @ 1:35pm

well i think were about 20 thousand years away from teleportation

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

powers

kentrell morrrow, Nov 1st, 2009 @ 1:13am

So, can you give me the ability to teleport?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

cure for cancer

Dave, Mar 17th, 2010 @ 12:58pm

Sorry this comment has nothing to do with the orginal article but; there is however, a cure for cancer, several actually. Look it up, google it. The rick simpson story on youtube is also quite iformative. Caution however, only look into it if you want to find out the truth about the world we live in.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

my idea about teleportation

ghost, May 1st, 2010 @ 12:09am

I GOT SOME IDEAS ABOUT THIS TELEPORTATION THING THAT IF WE KEEP ANY BODY IN TWO HIGH ELECTRODE IN A AIR TIGHT VACUUM AND SEE IF IT WORKS

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2010 @ 11:47pm

its cool build it fast

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re:

Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2010 @ 11:47pm

whatever i think its stupid

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

teleportation

JC, Nov 2nd, 2010 @ 4:55pm

Wormholes magnetic Fields tunnels- if atoms travel faster than the speed of light would they have time to change,or will they remain intact at the other side?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re.Teleportation

William Rain, Apr 19th, 2011 @ 3:31am

Although targeting a earth destination might be difficult. i really don't think Teleportation isn't as easy as going from point A to point B we may need to use a Borderworld with some sorta Focal Point to connect the dots and allow us to teleport to the destination we wanna teleport to. I think we need to construct a Lambda Team!

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Re: Physics

Person, Aug 17th, 2011 @ 3:48am

No if u think about the rock was was storing that potential energy sitting on the table. Once in the air gravity does it's work and transfers that to kinetic energy.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

teleportation

jar, Oct 8th, 2011 @ 10:05pm

If teleporrtation were possible. You could cure any disease known to man by removing infected areas of the host between the process of disintigration and reintigration through pre scan and post infected scan

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

teliportation

jar, Oct 10th, 2011 @ 6:09pm

Coward pretty much speaks for itself

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Name
Email	Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
URL
Subject
Comment	this is for spambots, do not use this
Options	Save me a cookie

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Name
Email	Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
URL
Subject
Comment	this is for spambots, do not use this
Options	Save me a cookie

How Far Are We Away From Teleportation?

from the beam-me-up-scotty dept

Reader Comments (rss)

never

Oh well

Physics

Re: Physics

go learn something

Re: go learn something

Re: never

Jesus Christ Dennis

Re: never

1028 atoms?

But this could be used for other uses.

I'll settle for genuinely immersive telepresence

First steps in teleportation.

It's been done...

advanced technology

Re: Teleportation

Re: 1028 atoms?

.....

The Religious Factor

Portal on the Mind?

Welcome to the Aperture Science Enrichment Center.

hmm

I predict teleportation will become commonplace

Re: never

Didn't Einstein say...

Re: never

Teleportation

Doubt it could ever be done!

Re:

For all the idiots who seem to think teleportation

Stick to something you know about

Looks like you're right

Re: Re: 1028 atoms?

Re: Welcome to the Aperture Science Enrichment Cen

Re: 1028 atoms?

Re:

Re: Re: Teleportation

Re: hmm

Teleportation

Re:

Re:

Impossible Things in History

Re: Physics

Re: Welcome to the Aperture Science Enrichment Cen

most comments

no teleport?

Re: Physics

Teleporting MP3

Re: 1028 atoms?

Re: 1028 atoms?

You'uns is certainly going to get mad at this one

Surgery

Re: Physics

Re:

Think of the military implications

Two Words

Re: never

Re: You'uns is certainly going to get mad at this

Re:

Death by Teleportation

1028 atoms

Its Magic

Re: 1028 atoms?

Re: Physics

Re: Physics

The Prestige???

Re: Re: Physics

Re: Physics

Re: Re: 1028 atoms?>>pretty sure poster knew this.

How Far Are We Away From Teleportation?

Re: Re: 1028 atoms?

Re: Re: You'uns is certainly going to get mad at t

unbelievable

Soul research

Teleportation is as old as recorded History

Re: go learn something

Re: