Google, AOL, Yahoo And Microsoft All Sued Over Excessively Broad Auction Patent
from the innovation-at-work dept
In the latest silly patent lawsuit to be filed in Marshall, Texas a company holding a patent on using gaming to determine the final price of an auction system. The company is now claiming that Google, AOL, Yahoo and Microsoft are all violating the patent with their ad auction models. The interesting thing here is that the patent is clearly talking about a very different system. It describes a process of setting a range for a price, and then allowing some sort of game ("a video game, electronic board game, sports bet, card game") to determine what the actual final price is within that range. Of course, that doesn't sound at all like what the various companies listed here are doing. However, that's where whoever drafted the patent earned his or her money. Rather than limiting it to games like those listed, the following phrase was also added: "or any other activity." This is right out of the standard patent attorney's playbook for creating super broad patents -- though it goes against the entire purpose of the patent system. None of the companies involved built their businesses based on this patent. They certainly didn't get the idea for an ad auction based on this patent. Instead, this is just some company taking an overly broad patent and trying to apply it to big, rich companies, in the hopes of scoring some kind of cash settlement. That's not what the patent system is designed to do.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
by Anonymous Coward on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 12:05pm
They should invoke a 4 choice verdict when lawsuits are filed. 1) They win, get money and defendant has to discontinue action
2) They win, other defendant has to discontinue action, no money awarded
3) They lose, that's it
4) They lose and the lawsuit was absurd enough that they deserve to be thrown in jail for a great length of time
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Fixing this problem. by Killer_Tofu on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 12:24pm
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Fixing this problem. by Killer_Tofu on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 12:27pm
Rather than just throwing them in jail as #1 suggested.
I have a different idea.
Just invalidate the patent they brought to trial here, as well as any other patent they own or have any partial ownership of. Then also say that they can no longer file patents for anything.
That should help reduce the amount of BS lawsuits over patents with massive obviousness. Just the biggest threat ever for doing so.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Fixing this problem. by Casper on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 12:29pm
That's not a bad idea. If you exploit the system, you don't get to use it. Just like every other system we have.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Criminal by Rick on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 1:04pm
I agree with the coward. Start tossing these companies corporate officers in jail for frivolous lawsuits or making the loser pay all legal fees plus a penalty. The risk should run both ways.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
an idea by joe smith on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 1:37pm
Why doesn't Google and Microsoft take over the world, than all our problems would be solved!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: an idea by General Eskimo on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 5:42pm
They already have! The only reason you don't know it yet is because they are too busy fighting each other, and don't have the time to announce their victory. When one company goes bankrupt, the other will inherit control over the world.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: an idea by Mr. Ito on Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 9:04pm
Didn't you know? Microsoft has a secret base underneath Renton and thats were they train there AI hackers!! they are getting ready to take over the world!! O No!! And Google is really part of Microsoft!? O NO!!
no really that would be easyer if they took over the world.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Fixing this problem. by mkam on Oct 4th, 2007 @ 4:14am
Just invalidate the patent they brought to trial here, as well as any other patent they own or have any partial ownership of. Then also say that they can no longer file patents for anything.
Right but the problem is these companies often will buy 'intellectual property' from some other company and then go on a sue campaign. And everyone looses except the lawyers.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RE #9 by Killer_Tofu on Oct 4th, 2007 @ 6:01am
Thought about tossing that one in there too:
Any patent they buy is automatically invalidated.
Would work. =)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ummmm... by A. L. Flanagan on Oct 4th, 2007 @ 9:31am
>> That's not what the patent system is designed to do.
Well, certainly not originally. But if you call what Congress and the courts and the USPTO have done in the past few years "design" then it IS what was designed. On the other hand, if you call what they've done "incompetent, self-serving, disorganized tinkering", then you're absolutely right.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment