Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jul 19th, 2007 @ 9:25pm

   
   

   Considering that for the price you pay for a housing ad in local paper you can put that same ad on a website and get much more circulation is this really a surprise?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   dgeezer, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 12:46am

   
   

   Re:

   I agree wholeheartedly. I am a small time (less than 20 tenants) landlord. My local paper charges me $145.00 for a 7 day apartment for rent ad. I can advertise on Craigslist for free. I get at least as many calls from Craigslist, but most of the calls are from people that are interested in looking at the listing since I can include so much more useful info in the online ad.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   My2Cents, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 5:49am

   
   

   Whats new anyway

   The phrase "news" is rapidly becoming a misnomer. What the newspaper prints as "news" happened often hours ago if not the day before and reported on the tv or internet the instant it happened and has since been passed passed over for more current events. "History report" would be a much more appropriate title for what we now call the "news paper". We no longer light our homes with candles or pump our own water. These newspsper people are just riding a horse on the freeway. The old technology will die of neglect soon.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   Brian, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 6:46am

   
   

   Re: Whats new anyway

   Everyone should re-read My2Cents comment and let it sink in what interesting times we are fortunate to be living in. It wasn't 75 years ago that a simple letter to England could take a month to arrive and then another month for a reply - and that's if the ships didn't sink (and if they did on either leg, you'd have no way of knowing). In the past, wars have been started (Lusitania) and prolongued (Battle of New Orleans) because of such lag.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   paperboy, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 7:19am

   
   

   little guy

   I think they need to take a step back and think about how many kids are now unemployeed because of the shift to internet news.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   That Guy, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 7:26am

   
   

   Why I still get the sunday paper

   I'll be honest the ONLY reason I get my Sunday paper is for the local ads. Yes, I know that I can go to Target.com, Bestbuy.com, etc. etc. to see what's on sale that week, but frankly its easier to just have them all sitting in front of me.
   
   I think something that's overlooked in this conversation is what appears to me to be a growth in independent weekly papers and free niche local magazines. These publications exist almost solely as vehicles for local advertisers, and community events.
   
   I actually think the weekly papers and magazines will be the final blow that knocks newspapers out, and not the internet.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Geoip, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 7:30am

   
   

   How

   I agree a bit with My2Cents. However, I think that newspapers have the ability to do more than straight news. They have space for analysis and information that needs digested. We can listen to a news talk show say on CNN and get a view point of the news or a debate on the news but it's easy to gloss over facts on those shows. What papers could do is offer an honest debate (which could be hard for some papers). If the spent time to provide graphs and analysis of news items along side the news they could have a good formula. Right now they offer what their readers already know. I would imagine they'd do better with a Newsweek or Time style format, analysis and news mixed together. If you are going to be late on the news you might as well do it for a reason.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   Joseph, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 8:49am

   
   

   huh?

   Was anyone else confused with the logic presented in this article? Yes, we are in a housing slump, but the slump has resulted in record levels of housing inventory. I would think that if anything, there are more houses on the market that need advertising. How does more houses = less listings available for newspapers?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   andy, Jul 20th, 2007 @ 1:34pm

   
   

   another effect...

   another effect of the housing slump is that construction is slower... you have fewer housing developments/developers popping up and buying ads in newspapers.
   
   housing developments usually have intense marketing budgets, so when those dry up it hits papers pretty hard.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment