How the US fares in terms of broadband adoption compared to other countries has been the subject of considerable debate. A recent report put out by the OECD warns that the US is falling behind other countries, although the report didn't take into account other factors, like population density. A new study from a Washington think tank looks at broadband adoption in different countries, but frames the issue a little differently (via Jeff Nolan). Instead of just looking at raw numbers, the study takes into account the economic, political and geographical factors that might affect adoption in one way or another. So, for example, it argues that Turkey and Portugal are actually doing very well, particularly when you factor in economic conditions. Conversely, Korea and Japan aren't the broadband miracles that they're made out to be. As for the US, the study claims that it's underperforming relative to its potential. There are certainly going to be quibbles with the study's methodology, particularly as it seems difficult to ascertain where a country's broadband penetration should be as opposed to where it is. But it makes a lot more sense to look at the factors that make each country's situation unique, rather than just comparing them all as if conditions were uniform, which ultimately results in scaremongering and political posturing.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- US Works Its Way Up To The Middle Of The Pack In Broadband Speed
- Anti-Net Neutrality Advocates Back To Making Bogus Arguments
- Decades Of Failed Promises From Verizon: It Promises Fiber To Get Tax Breaks... Then Never Delivers
- New Mockumentary Highlights Why An Open Internet With Real Competition Is Important
- Telco Astroturfing Or Elaborate Double-Reverse Sabotage Fakeout? You Decide