The Downside Of The Muni WiFi Hype Cycle Rolls On

from the we-love-you-we-hate-you dept

Municipal WiFi got hyped up to such ridiculous levels that it was bound to be seen as a failure, often by the same media that whipped up expectations in the first place. Now, in Toronto, the paper notes that the citywide WiFi network there has seen usage fall since its free trial period ended. What? You mean more people will use a WiFi network when it's free than when they have to pay? Shocking, we know. The company behind the network says that it's converting more free users to paid subscribers than it had planned, but that doesn't seem to placate the reporter of the original story, who manages to work in another yarn of hype by saying the WiFi network "may soon be irrelevant" because of the emergence of WiMAX. In reality, the approach of Toronto Hydro, the company that built and runs the network, seems pretty good. Its interest began with using WiFi for a pragmatic purpose -- remote meter reading -- and it then decided to extend its network to offer public internet access. The company's public network now covers only six square kilometers, and it's waiting to attract a sufficient number of users before expanding citywide, rather than jumping in whole-hog and experiencing the problems other providers have faced when launching much bigger networks. This relentless build-'em-up-then-knock-'em-down hype cycle doesn't help anybody, but when it comes to muni WiFi, it doesn't look like it's going to stop anytime soon.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    slartibartfast, Jul 5th, 2007 @ 6:39pm

    Wow!

    Gee, there's a surprise, the media beating up a story! Who would have thought .......

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Ben, Jul 6th, 2007 @ 3:07am

    THe whole build it up then knock it down cycle is just what the mmedia does to everything and everyone. It sells newspapers, gets viewers, increases web page impressions so they do it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    JJ, Jul 6th, 2007 @ 8:06am

    At least..

    At least this wasn't on the public's coffer, but private money invested. That's fine IMO. What gets my goat is when public monies are involved in Internet and specifically, WiFi for cities, etc. Governments are notoriously incompetent and wasteful of resources, and their approach to security is always law enforcement instead of proper network security as a proactive preventative measure.

    No loss here, IMO. Private companies need to try these things.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This