Wireless

Wireless

by Mike Masnick




French Officials Can't Resist Their Crackberries, Even If It Means Giving Secrets To American Spies

from the must...-use...-crackberry dept

We've all heard the RIM Blackberry referred to as a "Crackberry" for its supposedly addictive nature... however, we never thought that it was true that anyone really couldn't do without their Blackberry mobile device. Apparently the French government has banned the devices for certain government officials who might email sensitive information. Since RIM has all emails run through its own servers, some of which reside in the US, the French government is worried (perhaps reasonably so) that American spies are snooping on their sensitive emails. However, apparently many French government officials just can't let go and are still using Blackberry devices on the sly... even if it means sending classified info. What's odd is that various officials say they can't find anything else that works quite like the Blackberry, even though there are more and more solutions that do -- and many of them don't require emails to go through special servers in the US.

12 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 7:23am

    "serving" the customer

    by Joe Smith

    A similar issue came up with the German Army. You would think that RIM would have established a secure server in Europe by now to serve French and German government clients.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 7:48am

    Pointless

    Apparently the word Echelon has slipped from the collective memory. Airbus' bribery in Saudi Arabia wasn't caught through Crackberry messages.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 8:53am
    by PhysicsGuy

    of course i am french! why else would i talk with this ridiculous accent?!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 9:24am

    Re: "serving" the customer

    by Anonymous Coward

    Maybe they wanted to, but couldn't afford it after paying off Canadian tech companies who were too incompetent to utilize the technology, and the related legal fees.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 9:54am

    Re: Re:

    by Joe Smith

    Maybe they wanted to, but couldn't afford it after paying off Canadian tech companies who were too incompetent to utilize the technology, and the related legal fees.

    NTP was an American company.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 10:31am

    Re:

    by Chronno S. Trigger

    We're not French, we're rude. It just sounds better with a French accent.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 10:36am

    Re: Re: Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    Way to miss the point, Joe-Irrelevant-Detail-Smith. If that IS your real name. At least I'm comfortable with my cowardice.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 10:57am
    by ignorant american

    Like anyone cares what the French are doing...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 12:41pm

    chacun a son gout

    by Joe Smith

    Way to miss the point, Joe-Irrelevant-Detail-Smith. If that IS your real name. At least I'm comfortable with my cowardice.

    And I am comfortable with my alias.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. Jun 20th, 2007 @ 9:34pm

    Works both ways

    by Lawrence D'Oliveiro

    That's OK. As I recall, the digital radios that US forces were using in the Iraq invasion were French-made. Remember, this was after the dust-up over the French making it clear they would veto any Security Council resolution to invade Iraq.

    So if there's any leaking of important secrets through backdoors in equipment, it probably works both ways. :)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Jun 22nd, 2007 @ 4:33am

    Re: works both ways

    by vicky

    'So if there's any leaking of important secrets through backdoor' get rid of 'of important secrets'.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. Jul 30th, 2007 @ 10:21pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It