RSS
Despite Resistance From DOJ, Google Pressing New Antitrust Case Against Microsoft
from the relentless dept
By no means has Microsoft prevented Google from thriving, but that hasn't stopped Google from occasionally waving the antitrust stick in Microsoft's direction. Last year, the company complained that the searchbar in IE7 was anti-competitive because it defaulted to Microsoft's Live search, a pretty flimsy claim in its own right, but patently absurd in light of the fact that Google pays companies like Dell to establish itself as a default search engine. This weekend, the New York Times reported that Google has quietly filed an antitrust complaint against Microsoft pertaining to Vista and desktop search. Specifically, Google claims that Microsoft engineered Vista in such a way so as to render third-party desktop search offerings more difficult to use. This type of thing, Google claims, specifically violates Microsoft's settlement with the DOJ, which compels the company to make its operating systems hospitable to third-party applications. Where the story gets more interesting is that the top antitrust lawyer at the DOJ took the unusual step of sending a letter to various state prosecutors encouraging them not to take up Google's cause. Not only were they nonplussed by the letter, but there's a sense that the official may have some sort of conflict of interest, since he used to work at the law firm that defended Microsoft during its antitrust case. This, however, is not a black and white question, since he didn't actually work on the Microsoft case while at the firm. Furthermore, given the current administration's generally laissez-faire attitude towards antitrust issues, it's not surprising that the DOJ would be populated by lawyers sympathetic to Microsoft. Either way, it looks like more headaches for Microsoft, as the letter seems to have backfired, and a number of states seem set to take up Google's complaint.
12 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Come off it
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It might have been different...
It would be like if OJ went out and killed another one of ex-lovers 'cause he got away with it the first time. This has been Microsoft's actions in many ways. They are still playing monopolist like they always have. Linux patent FUD? Vista cutting out security vendors?
There are literally hundreds of other examples of how MS has continued to play hardball even when they already totally dominate the desktop. What are we left with? A bloated crap-ass product we are all forced to upgrade too. Doesn't seem like everything is so great in MS land anymore.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It might have been different...
"Vista cutting out security vendors?" and if you change the kernel to make the OS much more secure, then you are making the OS much more secure instead of sitting on your but and whining about how your current software version is no longer needed. Heck, wagon wheels are not as popular today because the vehicle has changed.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
@anonymous
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
As a developer...
Me doest think the queen protests too much.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Google Jumping The Shark
The court before innovation thing really helped Netscape didn't it?
For all the Microsoft haters... pay attention Google is getting big, wants to insert itself in everything. And seems to think any data should be its to give away including your personal info.
The enemy of Microsoft is not necessarily your friend..
BTW When I start IE 7 for the first time it asks if I want to change my default search provider. Sounds like Google needs more marketing and less attorneys.. What is Microsoft suppose send out invitations to use Google now too!!!
Time for Tort reform that punished companies for wasting the Justice Department's Time
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The time has come...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
MSN Search Losing Market Share
I do not like Google at all, having had a few sites fall victim to Google's sandbox. Google's results have been dismal for 3 years now, particularly for newer websites. Microsoft's attempt to steer users to MSN/Live has been an abject failure. It's a non-issue, really.
As for Google's desktop search, how many people use that? Nobody I know does. It may be another non-issue that nobody cares about.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Silly and shortsighted
This stuff is awfully shortsighted on google's part since, given that their search dominance is still growing, there is a future in which someone is going to sue them claiming that putting a new app on the homepage or ranking their apps above a competitors in a search is similiar to services within MS own OS, defaulting to their stuff.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is pure 1st class BS
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It might have been different...
What? MS made an insecure system to begin with so 3rd party vendors came up with solutions to the problem. MS then changes the way you access the kernel and doesn't share it with anyone they are not partnered with. They then extort extra money from all security vendors and at the same time bundle their own security software with the OS.
It is the same old story, rather than allowing Vista to be modular so that vendors can easily make plugins they do just the opposite. They lock it up and hold the keys for a fee and then throw in their own crappy in-house version of all popular software.
The problem is when you try to do it all you end up sucking at everything.
Anti-competitive? Yes
Monopolistic? Yes
After all it's good old MS!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment