Circuit Court Delivers Blow To FCC's Push To Clamp Down On TV Cursing
from the new-legal-strategy-time dept
Over the past few years, the FCC's been increasing its efforts to regulate "indecent" programming -- both in terms of what it wants to regulate on broadcast television, but also by expanding the scope of its regulation to include cable. The FCC's indecency push (which it tries to justify with complaint stats inflated by form letters from activist groups) has been met with a lot of resistance from broadcasters, but also by courts who aren't happy with the Commission's vague guidelines and inconsistent policies. Yesterday, the FCC got a pretty significant smackdown from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the broadcasters' argument that its policy on "fleeting expletives" was invalid because it was "arbitrary and capricious". Essentially, the court said that the FCC can't simply change its stance without offering valid justification, and reversing 30 years of precedent requires a "reasoned basis" -- apparently "because we can, and 'cause we feel like it" isn't sufficient. While the court limited its ruling to the question of fleeting expletives, it added that it was skeptical the FCC could craft an argument that could pass constitutional muster, while also noting, like previous courts, that plenty of tools exist for parents to protect their children from objectionable programming. It seems likely that the FCC will appeal the case to the Supreme Court, but given the depth of the Circuit Court's opinion, a favorable outcome doesn't seem likely. As Adam Theirer notes, should the the wider constitutional issues come up in the appeal, the FCC could lose all of its powers to regulate indecent programming on public airwaves.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
And to think... by TheDock22 on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 1:33pm
There's a bill floating around congress to allow the FCC to censor the Internet.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: And to think... by Chris on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 1:49pm
um, how could they censor the internet? even if the entire internet was subject to US law, there's no way they could actually censor the entire net. the gov't can't even stop kiddy porn and p2p, you think they could stop swearing online?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Fuck the FCC. by GoblinJuice on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 1:57pm
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: And to think... by Anonymous Coward on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 2:31pm
I think there is always a bill floating around Congress and/or state legislatures trying to regulate the Internet, prohibit flag burning, requiring schools to post the 10 commandments, and every other half-witted idea someone thinks will get them brownie points with some special interest group.
Fortunately most die quiet deaths. Unfortunately most of them get resurrected in a slightly modified form the next legislative session.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: And to think... by Charles Griswold on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 2:46pm
They'll implant us all with V-chips.(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Fuck the FCC. by joe on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 3:03pm
Yes, Fuck the FCC
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Fuck the FCC. by Casper on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 3:26pm
I don't think you would enjoy that much...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Immovable Object Guy on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 4:11pm
I know of the best parental control device - the off button.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Fuck the FCC. by Mike on Jun 5th, 2007 @ 4:50pm
Yes, fuck them. Fuck them in their stupid ears. The FCC is a mostly worthless entity. IMO they should regulate the allocation of radio wave frequencies *ONLY*. As far as I'm concerned they have far overstepped their boundaries.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
As it should be. by Myself on Jun 6th, 2007 @ 12:55am
"...should the the wider constitutional issues come up in the appeal, the FCC could lose all of its powers to regulate indecent programming on public airwaves."
Which would be the most overwhelmingly positive thing to happen in a long time, both to the airwaves and to the FCC.
Consumers and the market would be free to decide what belongs on the air, and the Commission would be free to focus on technical matters and spectrum ransom.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by mc on Jun 6th, 2007 @ 1:06am
I'm tired of all editing and bleeping on tv stop treating us like bunch of babies.. and paranoid parents your kid eventually we learn how to use popular words like fuck,bitch,motherfucker, list goes on.. in school or friend house etc..
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Fuck the FCC. by FCC isn't Fed Censorship Comission on Jun 6th, 2007 @ 7:01am
the FCC may be overstepping it's bounds with cable regulation.
however the FCC isn't worthless. they do provide a standardization for communication technology. and that's great. although you could argue that IEEE does a standup job with communication standards as well.
and while i feel that some things on TV (cable) aren't "right" i feel that as a subscripiton service, i can't force them to produce content i want to see.
many cable compines are offering "al a carte and 'like' programming" packages. you can get all your bible thumping w/o any of the "gore n' porn" channels, or get your sports w/o all the shopping stuff.
now, people who say the FCC should have control over cable, i ask this. should there be a governmental agency that regulates what condiments go on hamburgers? if i go to my burger joint, should i have to buy a burger with condiments i don't like? coz now i can say yes mor emustard, no onions/pickles please. if the burger isn't made, i won't buy it again.
just like cable...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment