Have No Fear, Federal Government Issues Data Leak Prevention Guidelines

from the see,-it-looks-like-we're-doing-something dept

Following a spate of data leaks and breaches at federal agencies, the Office of Management and Budget has now issued a set of guidelines for agencies to reduce the chances of data losses, while giving them 120 days to come up with breach-notification policies. The guidelines sound useful, particularly the advice that agencies should reduce the amount of information they collect and store to a minimum. However, it's hardly surprising to see that overall, the document is pretty toothless. What happens if agencies don't meet the 120-day deadline? Nothing, apparently, but maybe they'll be sent another memo. Furthermore, the "Rules and Consequences Policy" doesn't actually spell out any consequences should an agency lose data, rather it just says agency heads need to come up with a policy outlining behavior standards and the repercussions of breaking them. It's this sort of hands-off attitude that's the real problem here: nobody is ever forced to accept any sort of personal responsibility for these breaches, so there's little motivation -- beyond acting out of selflessness -- for government employees or businesses to take the situation seriously. Memos directing people to take some action, with no real followthrough, isn't the same thing as actually taking action. Until that happens, expect the data leaks to continue at the federal government, and elsewhere.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), May 24th, 2007 @ 11:16am

    And we all know ..

    .. how selfless the government is ....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    discojohnson, May 24th, 2007 @ 12:15pm

    you want to stop it real quick?

    $1000 fine per suspected identity charged directly to the company and if not paid within 90 days then they freeze the companies assets and take it out of hide. oh, and $1000 to the person affected. doesn't sound like much, but when most of these are like 40k lost at a swat that's 80mil. do that once or twice and the bottom line is hit pretty hard. oh, and they'll drop the CIO into a vat of boiling oil..sponsored by crisco no less.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    g, May 24th, 2007 @ 1:03pm

    Re: you want to stop it real quick?

    Suspicion leading to fines? We don't need any more penalties based solely on suspicion around these parts I think.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    discojohnson, May 24th, 2007 @ 2:30pm

    Re: Re: you want to stop it real quick?

    because unless the company is liable, the situation where my info is leaked and they know it was..but no one did anything so there's no retribution and no reason to close the holes. but here in 10 years after sitting on the data suddenly strange charges show up on accounts i never opened.

    the only thing that matters to companies is the bottom line, so that's where you have to put the pressure. they don't give a damn about doing "what's right" once an individual customer no longer matters because the company is has grown too large.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This