Overhype

Overhype

by Joseph Weisenthal




Rethinking The Bubble Of All Bubbles

from the bulbs-bulbs-bulbs dept

As long as we're revisiting our assumptions about the dot com bubble, it might be time to look back at another one of history's most infamous bubbles. A new book argues that the Dutch tulip bubble of the 17th century was not nearly as big of a deal as it's been cracked up to be (via Marginal Revolution). The book tries to dispel a number of notions, including the idea that tulip mania was a society-wide phenomenon. Instead, claims the book's author, trading in tulip bulbs was mainly confined to a narrow group of elites, who were interested in tulips as pieces of art, not as investments. Because not many people were involved in the tulip trade, the overall economic effects were fairly insignificant. Perhaps what's most interesting is the book's explanation for why the tulip bubble has come to be viewed as it has. Apparently, the main first-hand accounts of the mania were written by a few judgmental scolds, who sought to play up the absurdity of the tulip trade, and so subsequent histories have relied heavily on their accounts. However, even if this revisionist account is true, it still doesn't refute the idea that at one point, tulips were the subject of major speculative excess. It's also a reminder that not all bubbles are the same, since some are based on pure speculation, while others leave a lasting societal benefit.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    May 17th, 2007 @ 12:24am
  • Tell That To The Casualties

    by Lawrence D'Oliveiro

    Dot-com bust not a big deal? Tell that to the folks left with hefty tax bills on their underwater stock options.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • May 17th, 2007 @ 3:39am
  • Wiser now

    by DarkDancer

    This relates to an earlier topic. Hopefully all those that emerged from the bubble burst are now wiser and more knowledgable. Granted, nobody is earning the same amount of silly money - BUT i do believe that as soon as investment firms and VCs think that the bubble still exists another round of finance will come into play....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • May 17th, 2007 @ 3:40am
  • Wiser now

    by DarkDancer

    This relates to an earlier topic. Hopefully all those that emerged from the bubble burst are now wiser and more knowledgable. Granted, nobody is earning the same amount of silly money - BUT i do believe that as soon as investment firms and VCs think that the bubble still exists another round of finance will come into play....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • May 17th, 2007 @ 3:44am
  • The Future...

    by Dan

    With every new generation of technology we will always have those who believe they can make a few quid. and will throw cash at the industry.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • May 17th, 2007 @ 8:31am
  • As usual, it's the Baby Boomers

    by John B

    I think that one of the primary drivers of the series of bubbles we have seen, and are continuing to see, is a result of the Baby Boomers preparing for their retirement. After decades of spending more than they earn, Baby Boomers hit middle age and saw old age around the corner and panicked. They decided they desperately needed to invest and make money quickly. This has resulted in a lot of money chasing too few good investment opportunities. When one bubble bursts, the Boomers move their money to a different booming (pun intended) market. Thus, the dotcom bubble, then the communications industry bubble, then the real estate market bubble, and now the beginnings of a green energy bubble.

    Name a year when there wasn't a bubble forming or bursting since the late 1990's. It's essentially the same money chasing investment after investment.

    What's the solution? Open up third world financial markets, which are notoriously restrictive to foreign investment. Especially, open up the market for our investment in India and China. These countries are relatively cash-poor and labor rich, compared to the U.S. They need the money and we need places to invest.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • May 17th, 2007 @ 11:08pm
  • It's a new paradigm

    by RE.Agent

    It's a new paradigm, and everybody who doesn't buy, now, will be priced out forever. Anybody who does buy will be rewarded with a lifetime of riches, as their property will continue its 30% yearly price increase.

    Renters, and anybody born in a future generation, will not be able to afford a $10,000,000 starter home in 15 years. They will live in tent cities, and Hondas.

    This asset bubble is different than all of the others - it will never slow down, or pop. The gains are permanent.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It