Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Which people?

   

   Michael Long, May 1st, 2007 @ 4:18pm

   
   

   Are "people" largely uninterested in telecommuting? Or is the limiting factor employers that don't trust their employees to work when no one is around to watch them?
   
   And is the concern justified?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   Angryoaf, May 1st, 2007 @ 4:19pm

   
   

   I dunno if its so much employees being "uninterested in telecommuting" as it is employers being uninterested in stepping outside the box.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Telecommute

   

   I wish, May 1st, 2007 @ 5:05pm

   
   

   I work for a financial business and we are not allowed to telecommute. I believe my employer's concern is the concern of many. I deal with a great deal of very sensitive information and it's easier to prevent someone stealing that type of information if you're on site, using company equipment. Not only that, the employer's have the ability to restrict non-authorized people from entering the building, something they can't do at your house.
   
   I'm all for telecommuting, and I know I'd love to be able to, but alas I cannot. I wish more companies would open up and allow people to telecommute, it would be a great deal easier for everyone involved.
   
   Just my $0.02

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Telecommuting SUCKS

   

   Bumbling old fool, May 1st, 2007 @ 5:07pm

   
   

   When you are in a cubicle farm (the only people that the true benefits fo telecommuting apply to) then telecommuting is akin to job suicide.
   
   No matter how well you perform, EVERYONE assumes you are slacking off all day.
   
   Obviously, IT SHOULDNT MATTER if you are doing what they paid you to do. But it does.
   
   I refuse to telecommute. I don't need the pressure.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   when I telecommute

   

   Night Elf Hunter, May 1st, 2007 @ 5:38pm

   
   

   I end up playing world of warcraft instead of working. I get very little done at home.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, May 1st, 2007 @ 7:18pm

   
   

   telecommuting is when I get the most work done; I tend to slack off in the office, especially between wasteful meetings.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   50 / 50 Responses

   

   Mark, May 1st, 2007 @ 7:34pm

   
   

   We will most likely see 50/50 responses here. Those who get distracted at home will vote nay on working from home, and those who couldn't care one bit about the office environment will vote the other way.
   
   FWIW, I get more done at the office by putting my out of office on for several days and all but locking myself in a quiet room, or small conf room. Works for a while :)

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   Either Or

   

   Joe, May 1st, 2007 @ 9:22pm

   
   

   I get just as much done at work as I do at home. I think it's more a willpower/self-discipline thing.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   telecommuting

   

   Anonymous Coward, May 1st, 2007 @ 9:29pm

   
   

   As a firefighter, I find telecommuting rather difficult. I'd be interested in knowing for what percentage of commuters it's even *possible* (in a physical sense, not whether there boss allows it, etc,) to telecommute.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    Anonymous Coward, May 2nd, 2007 @ 3:29pm

    
    

    Currently I work for a non-profit and I have better resources and equipment in my home office than I do at work. Therefore, what I can do at home takes me half the time it does when at work. I convey to my boss how much he is saving in actual payroll and that helps with much of the usual grumblings that come from employers.
    
    To those who say they only play games when working from home, all I can say is you won't have a job for very long if you can't produce. Self-discipline aside, whether at home or in the office work is work and you either do it or you don't. Don't fool yourself and give your lack of work ethic a label just to "prove" how telecommuting doesn't work. Just because you don't want to work doesn't mean there are not plenty of us who do.
    
    I may be wrong, but I think what the 'telecommuting industry' is having issues with is the whole idea that working from home is only a temporary fix or a band-aid when it can be a very viable and effective working situation over the long term. If employers can accommodate telecommuting even temporarily, then why not permanently or semi-permanently? Taking the view that it is a band-aid solution adds fuel to the age-old fire of how working from home isn't feasible in 'the real world'. It gives employers excuses, whether true or not, as to how it may have worked in an emergency situation, but still can never succeed as a more permanent environment.
    
    Yes, there will always be those who need a babysitter or drill sergeant to get them to do what they are paid to do. They are the ones who will be phased out of the working world. Once I have proven to a potential or current employer all the benefits and savings of telecommuting, I have yet to hear them say anything negative about the situation. But there will always be those employers who refuse to actually listen to logic and would rather pay twice the expense for half the work. So as telecommuting progresses, it will be those non-conforming employers stuck with the non-producing employees left wondering why their business isn't making money. After all, why pay for an employee to sit at their desk with nothing to do when you could instead only be paying for the actual time worked!
    
    Just my thoughts after working from home for the past 15 years...

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Telecommuting is good

    

    John, May 2nd, 2007 @ 5:33pm

    
    

    I think telecommuting is good. So what if the worker doesn't get up until 11:00 in the morning? Will he actually stop working at 5:00pm because it's "quitting time"? Or will he continue working because he's on a roll... and before he knows it, it's 1:00am and he's been working for over 14 hours.
    
    I think one of the biggest obstacles to telecommuting is the office manager who wants to see "bodies". Could programmers get the same job done if they worked from home? Sure they could. But then the office manager would have one less person in the office.
    If a VP walks by, the office manager can point to the 10 people in the cubicles as "proof" of the 10 people on the team. How can the office manager "prove" the people who telecommute are actually at work?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment