Regardless of whether the DOJ decides to intervene in Google's acquisition of DoubleClick, as Microsoft would like to see, it's clear that the company continues to come under heavy antitrust scrutiny, if not from the government then from competitors and the media. The Washington Post's Steven Pearlstein argues that the government should block the deal because the company is getting too powerful. However, he doesn't really explain why he thinks that the company is now too powerful and needs to be restrained. Instead, he ends his column by stating (as if it were an accepted fact) that the DOJ's case against Microsoft is what gave rise to Google, and that if the government did the same to Google now, the next Google might be allowed to rise up. Except, it's not at all clear what the case against Microsoft had to do with the rise of Google. Up until recently, Google wasn't even competing against Microsoft's core business. If, say, Linux had exploded over the last few years that same way Google has, then you might be able to point to actions taken against Microsoft for an explanation. Unless Google's opponents can demonstrate that the company is actually abusing its position to the detriment of the broader market and consumers, all of these antitrust complaints will be pretty flimsy.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Rep. Peter King's Office Suggests NPR Producer Lied About Being Detained At Border By DHS
- USTR Says TPP Must Be Kept Secret, Because The Public Is Too Stupid To Understand It
- DailyDirt: Technology Is Changing The Way We Talk Because Internetz, LOL
- Joe Biden Tells Chinese Citizens To 'Challenge The Government,' Neglects To Mention His Administration Doesn't Like Being Challenged
- Holy See (The Pope) Criticizes TPP And TAFTA/TTIP In WTO Speech