Ramblings

Ramblings

by Carlo Longino


Print



Analyst Says Yahoo Not Buying Facebook Is Akin To It Passing On Google

from the reality-check dept

Late last year, takeover talks between Yahoo and Facebook fell apart after the social-networking site rejected Yahoo's $1 billion offer. Yahoo was reportedly prepared to offer up to $1.62 billion, but a Wall Street analyst says that valuation was based on far too conservative estimates, and that Yahoo's failure to seal the Facebook deal could be on par with its infamous decision to not buy Google when it had the chance. His analysis is based on Facebook's high levels of traffic and the demographics of its users, and based on that he says "Facebook is no doubt one of the most important Internet companies to have been created in the last five years." He apparently avoids mentioning how much he thinks the site is worth, but numbers from $3.2 billion to the previously mentioned $8 billion get tossed around. Noticeably absent, however, is any mention of the revenues Facebook is generating. Like fellow social-networking site MySpace, Facebook has plenty of traffic, but it's really not clear how successfully the sites can monetize it, even when they're under the arm of a bigger corporate parent. What's even less clear is if these sites will have any more staying power than previous social-networking stalwarts, which have turned out to be little more than fads over the longer term. While Yahoo's shareholders probably do regret it passing on buying Google, it's pretty doubtful all that many of them would regret the company not dropping a few billion dollars on Facebook.

10 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Facebook

    by Luke - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 6:16am

    I left school full time almost 2 years ago when Facebook was just starting and only open to colleges that had been manually added to the system.

    Anyway, I still check it from time to time. Sometimes to catch up on people I went to college with and other times to see what the current students at my alma mater are doing. Turns out they're doing the exact same things I did...only w/ pictures on an easily shared Facebook.

    I don't see Facebook going away any time soon so long as they can continue offering a very open system that's some what secure to students. Basically if Facebook can continue to do what it is now without having to throttle or censor what people are doing then it will be around for a long time.

    It's like AIM - there may be better IM systems out there, but "everyone" has an AIM account. Facebook is becoming that for the college student. It's becoming a tool to be used and it will probably hold on for some time. Essentially once it becomes embedded in a school then it will continue because it becomes a tradition to pass it along to the new people.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. RE: A Reality Check Indeed

    by Cameron S - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 7:09am

    Buying Facebook or any of these fun but not profitable Web 2.0 sites is almost always the right decision. I really think the Web 2.0 market froth is quite irrational.

    If I was google I would have used the billions of dollars to acquire YouTube for a different thing - creating an amazing talent search competition using the billions of dollars for countless prizes in many categories for the best Google Videos. That would generate buzz and web traffic.

    FaceBook is not ever going to generate enough revenue to make an investment of such sheer magnitude worth it.

    There is a finite amount of traditional and non traditional advertising dollars spent each year in the world, and there is a limit to how many internet ads, video injected ads, etc people will put up with each year.

    Many people use Firefox and block some of the ads anyways, video ads are probably the future and most people find video ads on the web annoying at best.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. by Greg - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 7:27am

    "Facebook is no doubt one of the most important Internet companies to have been created in the last five years."

    hahaha what

    Seriously, what?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Facebook is worth so much because they know a lot

    by Anonymous Coward - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 7:34am

    This is haggling over the value of knowing who you and your neighbours' friends are.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. by webtech - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 7:45am

    Yahoo and Google already have so many acquisitions that are not yet making any good money. Google have so much load of cash left in its bank. So google need not be too much concerned about the right valuation for a company, it would not mind doing one or two mistakes. Yahoo doesn't have so much cash like Google, so it has to do the rope walk carefuly.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Anaylists...

    by Sanguine Dream - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 8:14am

    It sounds like anaylists these days will say anything that get them quote in the news and on blogs. Does it really take an anaylist to say that Facebook may be worth something? If that is the case then half the people using the internet are anaylists.


    Yes sites like Facebook could be set up to generate lots of revnue one day but I'm just bored with all these experts and anaylists trying to predict the next big thing.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. 10 years ago...

    by Brad Eleven - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 8:23am

    ... this same flavor of bogus buzz was going around. Please, let's not have another dot-com bubble.

    Webtech above is right--Google has plenty of cash, but Yahoo would demonstrate poor judgment by blowing billions on something they can't capitalize on. Google + YouTube = popular ad platform. Yahoo + Facebook = vanity.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Re: 10 years ago...

    by Anonymous Coward - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 8:44am

    Correct. But wouldn't quite say Yahoo + Facebook = Vanity. I'd say Yahoo + Facebook = Hoarding.

    If Yahoo goes through with this deal it won't because they think they can make Facebook profitable. It will be to stop someone else from capitalizing on it. Right now Yahoo is thinking, "We may not know how to capitalize on Facebook but we should buy to keep someone else from capitalizing on it."

    If Yahoo has a way to capitalize on Facebook and just won't tell, fine. But these days its a corporate strategy to buy up something for the sole purpose of making use no on else can get to it first, even if you never use it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. My God this 2nd bubble is worse than the 1st one

    by Anonymous Coward - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 9:27am

    $8 B-I-L-L-O-N??????? For Facebook? College freaking students don't have any money. Who else goes there. No really.

    Look a better plan would be for Yahoo to build a Facebook like site, and then pay $5 for a six pack of beer (or whatever) to every person that cancels their Facebook account and sign up for theirs. Infinitely cheaper.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. by Anonymous Coward - Apr 5th, 2007 @ 9:41am

    Simply put, there is no way to justify a valuation orf $1.6 billion for about 99.9% of Internet-based businesses including Facebook, MySpace, or any social networking website that exists now or in the future...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It