RSS
Thinking Digitally Still Isn't A Separate Job Function
from the wasted-executive-offices dept
Last year, in discussing the troubles that MTV has had in adapting to the internet generation, we noted that the company had hired someone to be their Chief Digital Officer, a position that lasted less than a year. As we mentioned at the time, this tells you a lot about why the network was struggling. "Digital" doesn't require a separate executive, or a separate department. These days, it needs to permeate across all job functions if a content company is going to figure out how to really embrace what digital content allows. That's why it's disappointing to see yet another network go down the same path, as TV network Bravo has now appointed a "Digital VP." Thinking digitally isn't a separate job function. It needs to be a part of the strategic thinking across all aspects of the brand. Otherwise, it ends up as a disconnected silo fighting for attention from the rest of the brand -- which isn't exactly the best way to put in place a true digital strategy.
I have an app...
How My First Game Made $28,623
App Developer Conversations: What Does The iPad Mini Mean For The App Economy?
I’m looking for research...
Innovate More. Code Less: Optimizing Open-Source Utilization
Who Are App Developers?
I have a business...
The Talent Wars: Today's Toughest Startup Challenge
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Wow
Damned insightful. Too bad you can't put this in front of CEOs everywhere.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
To rely on the same people who have been doing business in the same way for years and expect them to change never works. What these companies really need to do is hire a bunch of kids to run this department and give them full access. Hell, even tom hanks in "Big" knew this!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Digital execs.
Problem is, most of the execs who have been making film or television for the last 20 years see the internet and "digital" as one of two things:
1. An "added value" marketing platform for their traditional media programming or
2. A massive threat to their job security so they'll do everything in their (underground) power they can to make sure the "digital" folks don't do things that might be better/faster/cheaper or just plain cooler than they can do them.
In a lot of cases, it's both of those things.
I have yet to meet an exec who REALLY knows story development and/or physical production (both of which take a lot of knowledge and experience) AND have a really good grasp on the potential, the opportunities, and the global changes the web is bringing to the content business...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Who's up for it?
Of course it's a temporary position. Doomed as a dodo for all the reasons mentioned above. If the new veep is ineffective, he'll be fired for incompetence. If s/he's effective, he'll be fired for disruption. Whoever takes the job should consider it resume candy, enjoy the ride, and soak it for all it's worth.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment