HP Pays California $14.5 Million For Pretexting... But Will Use The Money To Fight Piracy?
from the say-what? dept
So the press is all abuzz with the news that HP has settled the civil suit filed against it for its little pretexting adventure. They're paying $14.5 million to the state in exchange for no civil suit from the Attorney General's office. The company still could face other charges, including from the federal government, but we'll see. Still, there's a very odd part to the settlement. Most of the money will go to a fund to help California fight intellectual property violations. Technically the fund is for both that and privacy issues, called the "Privacy and Piracy Fund." We can understand the privacy part -- since that's what HP violated -- but we're still scratching our heads over the piracy part. What do intellectual property violations (which, again, aren't really "piracy") have to do with the fact that HP used social engineering fraud tactics to spy on a whole bunch of people both inside and outside the company?
6 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Schrödinger's Download: Whether Or Not An iTunes Music Sale Is A 'Sale' Depends On Who's Suing
- We Don't Have A 'Wild West' Internet Now, But We Will If SOPA Or Similar Is Passed
- One Nation, Under Guard
- Supreme Court Denies Appeal For The Pirate Bay Founders
- White House Says It Can't Comment On Possible Chris Dodd Investigation





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Hmm...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Mark Hurd must have a friend...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Part of a pattern
Remember last week's news?
MPAA Kills Anti-Pretexting Bill (Dec 1, 2006):
This looks like the same pattern.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It has nothing to do with HP's deeds
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It has nothing to do with HP's deeds
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
duh
/sarcasm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment