Would The WTO Support Antigua Offering Free Music And Free Software In Retaliation For Gambling Ban?

from the it-certainly-could dept

For a few years now, we've been following how the US's attempt to ban online gambling potentially goes against international treaties they've signed as part of the WTO. The WTO has told the US that it cannot stop online gambling in Antigua, so long as it allows any online gambling in the US. The US (in true US fashion) simply pretended the WTO said something different and proceeded to ignore the ruling completely. The WTO has been warning the US to comply, but the latest attempt by Congress to ban online gambling actually makes the situation worse. The WTO was very clear that the only way the US can ban online gambling and stay in compliance with international treaties is to ban all online gambling, with no exceptions. Congress, on the other hand, made plenty of exceptions for the type of gambling they like (such as lotteries and horses).

Back in March, we pointed to a story suggesting that Antigua was considering retaliating by ignoring US intellectual property laws, in order to offer things like free (or cheap) music and software. Last month, the idea began to get more attention, and now a lawyer has written an interesting piece suggesting that the WTO may even support Antigua in ignoring its intellectual property treaty obligations as a fair retaliation against the US ignoring its online gambling obligations. It certainly seems like this idea is gaining a lot of traction, and if they weren't serious about it before, you have to imagine such ideas will certainly be brought to Antigua's attention pretty quickly. The end result, then, may be that the US's attempt at banning online gambling, may open up efforts supported by the WTO for Antigua to willfully infringe on US intellectual property. Wonder how fast that would lead entertainment companies to start lobbying in favor of allowing online gambling?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 10:48am

    finally someone stepping up to the plate.

    not some pac, not some lobbist group. a whole freaking nation. a seperate government. plus a the wto. that's great.

    once the IP holders stop gaining their profits, they'll force the us to change gambling laws, or the gambling pac/lobbist will force the us to ignore the IP laws.

    either wa, we make out!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 10:51am

    Wonder how fast that would lead entertainment companies to start lobbying in favor of allowing online gambling?

    Yeah, with the entertainment companies in complete control of the "allowed" gambling sites.

    MjM

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Jeff, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 12:04pm

    Consequences

    Before they pass another hair-brained law, maybe they'll think about the consequences... of course not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    emanuel, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 12:15pm

    another example of the states thinking they can do anything to anyone without consequences.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 12:17pm

    Re:

    Yes, I for one and tired of our corrupt politicians that have been bought and paid for by the entertainment industries as well.

    well, we jsut had a paradigm shift in congress. Think it will help? I doubt it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Xkribble, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 12:33pm

    Micro-Government

    I can see treaties being formed (and paid for) by the Micro-governments we call corporations... not against it mind you... but I can see say M$ paying off Antigua in order to protect their "intellectual Property" ... same with Adobe and others ...

    too much fun

    ... X ...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 12:35pm

    If Antigua goes ahead with this i wounder how long it will be till the us declairs that Antigua supports terrorists and starts to "liberate" the people ??

    just a thought

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Joe Smith, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 1:05pm

    Softwood

    "The US (in true US fashion) simply pretended the WTO said something different and proceeded to ignore the ruling completely"

    That's what the US did on softwood lumber until Canada finallly ran out of time for the fight and caved in. Of course, there is a price to be paid for that sort of dishonesty in the longer term dealings between countries.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Rust In Rivers, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 2:04pm

    One wee little country...

    Antigua is making a serious threat, one that is equivalent to North Korea's US counterfeiting operation. This is a serious threat to both the US and world economy and in my mind there's only one sure way to resolve this dispute. Invade!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Mike Mixer, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 4:06pm

    Re: Softwood

    As a citizen of a state that has been raped by the canadians and their wood that seems to have no environmental encumberances I take exception to the premise that Canada got screwed at all in that fight. The Canadian government wanted to flood us with their wood because the domestic market was in the shitter and ours was starving because of bunny-huggers crying over every tree we cut. It was just a survival move to impose tarrifs on that lumber so that our mills wouldn't die completely

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Charles Griswold, Nov 17th, 2006 @ 5:13pm

    Re: Re: Softwood

    bunny-huggers crying over every tree we cut


    If they don't want the trees to be cut, what are they doing living in wood houses?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Louis, Nov 18th, 2006 @ 8:33am

    Re: Re: Softwood

    People in wooden houses shouldn't throw molotov coctails.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Mousky, Nov 19th, 2006 @ 8:12pm

    Re: Re: Softwood

    Take exception, but the fact is that the US got to keep $1 billion of the duties that it illegally collected. This whole debacle began when American mills were upset that Canadian mills, specifically in British Columbia, could produce lumber cheaper. They accused the BC government of having artificially low stumpage fees. Who knew that having a lot of trees would result in low stumpage fees? Our wood was cheaper than your wood. Get over it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    AllOver, Nov 28th, 2006 @ 10:58pm

    Naaa

    This would never actually happen. The US and record industry weld too much influence. Certainly I would love to see Antigua do this to spite the backwards policies of the US on gambling and I also don't care too much for the recording industry right now either. But, I just don't see this ever happening. How do I know? Just an educated guess from a guy who keeps up with the news a lot.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    LeeAnn, Jan 28th, 2007 @ 10:46am

    Re: Softwood

    for godsakes do it antigua!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 2nd, 2007 @ 5:58am

    invade!

    next up news of antigua being a haven for pedo-terrorists with the usual results.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This