Is The $11 Million Online Defamation Judgment A Big Deal?
from the questions,-questions dept
Lots of folks are submitting the USA Today story about a woman who successfully sued an online critic for $11 million for defamation. There seems to be some concern that this is a big statement limiting what people can say online, but that's not clear at all. Defamation is defamation, online or not. And, if you're going to accuse someone of being a "con artist" and a "fraud," you should probably have some evidence to back that up. Now, it's completely possible that the accused can back that up -- but it's worth pointing out that she didn't show up at court to defend herself. She claims she can't afford a lawyer, and didn't even know the court date of the case because the info was sent to her address in New Orleans -- which she had abandoned for a few months following Hurricane Katrina. So, the case really doesn't say much about online speech or defamation, since there really was no defense at all.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Bland
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Vindicated?
The whole point of this lawsuit was a vindication of sorts and the Scheff knew that Bock couldn't pay the money yet went ahead anyway. It appears that Scheff didn't know that the award would be so much but still, her reputation ruined doesn't compare to the life she just ruined as a result of this lawsuit if Bock must pay. Eye for eye just turned into an eye for a heart. Doesn't seem very fair. Its unfortunate for Bock that she couldn't present her case.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This has happened to me, too.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
oh no wait, american courts seem to have jurisdiction over everybody now since people can sue other people internationally and expect not to be laughed at.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Nasty, Vindictive People
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Meaningless Award
This is not as unusual as it may seem. Similar actions occur everyday, although perhaps not in the multi million dollar range. Judgements routinely get ignored. It's only when the defendant is known to the plaintiff and information is found during discovery that it makes any difference.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I bet...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It happened on a forum
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=17255&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
T hat is a forum that simply blasts Sue Scheff and her organization. It's kinda funny to read and I can see her getting upset about some of the things that are said there. HOWEVER it's just a forum for cryin out lout. How can you sue someone over what they said in a forum that just has a bunch of ingrates venting about everything and nothing with as many expletives as possible. I find it hard to believe that this isn't a big deal. People are being sued over a forum post? Yikes.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Justice for sale in America
The judgement is a big deal because it amounts to an end run around the whole concept of freedom of speech. We have devolved, essentially, back to the Middle Ages, where the ruling classes could force the rest of us to do as ordered by force of law.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Don't be afraid to speak the truth...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Internet reputauion reputacion
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment