RSS
What Does It Say When The World's Largest Patent Holder Sees Problems With The System?
from the seems-telling dept
The world's most prolific patent filer, IBM, is taking steps to address what it sees as significant flaws in the patent system. Under a new policy, the company will be more open about what patents it holds, post filed patents to the web before they're accepted by the patent office, and stand opposed to broad, business-model patents that don't represent any technical innovation. CEO Sam Palmisano nicely lays out the business case for patent reform, "The larger picture here is that intellectual property is the crucial capital in a global knowledge economy. If you need a dozen lawyers involved every time you want to do something, it's going to be a huge barrier. We need to make sure that intellectual property is not used as a barrier to growth in the future." The company acknowledges that by posting its patent applications to the web, years in advance of when the patent is accepted, it's tipping off its competitors as to what technologies the company is working on. But ceding this competitive advantage is a small price to pay, if the overall technology market grows because of it. In fact, having competitors develop competing and complementary technologies to IBM's is critical to developing a thriving ecosystem. In this light, it shouldn't be surprising that a company with a history of innovation, like IBM, lead the way on patent reform. The current system is fraught with risks, including the possibility that less innovative firms will use the patent weapon to extract money from it, rather than actually bringing innovative products to market. Of course, it doesn't seem like IBM will slow down their own patent applications any time soon. There's still a defensive case for filing patents as inoculation against future lawsuits. But it's good to see such an influential company moving in this direction. Hopefully more of its peers will follow suit.
I have a business...
How To Successfully Get Your App Into China
The Talent Wars: Today's Toughest Startup Challenge
I’m looking for policy...
Policy Resources: Software Patents
Developers On Patents: Ron Garret of Awun
I have an app...
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
Top 5 Reasons Why Mobile Analytics Is Important
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
so why even post?
well, why not?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
????
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
It makes me very happy to see a company, without the basis for reforming their models, make the right choices to create a new industry worthwhile, without hurting themselves.
Way to go, IBM! You really have proven that without a large need for expectations, there will always be the ability to do the right thing in association with the communties knowledge and appreciation of the special intentions.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Good idea...
But my real fear is that this move won't motivate others to follow suit. IBM is taking a big leap of faith in this profit driven world.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good idea...
Nothing wrong with that. Since a patent is a government-granted monopoly, patents should be good ideas, not broadly written ideas. Patents should be of a high quality. They should add real value to society not just the patent holder. They should not prevent competition.
IBM is taking a big leap of faith in this profit driven world.
True, but they are also looking at reducing their costs relating to patent litigation. Keep in mind that if a patent is of a high-quality it will likely have a high value. The current patent system does not reward truly unique ideas. It rewards those who sit on broadly worded patents.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
IBM and their kind= more muscle to clean out compe
Good luck start-up companies. May the force be with you ;o
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you IBM
While the U.S. is still #1 in technological innovation, we are at risk of losing that edge as well. This really opens doors for people to open their minds.
Thank you IBM for providing a ray of hope through the clouds of madness ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Kick Ass
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
big blue's big warm fuzzies
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Great 1st step - now for the encore
Now, I'd love to see IBM pledge that they won't enforce any current IBM patent that would have fallen into this bucket during the past, say 5 years.
That would be real leadership (not that today's announcement isn't!).
Savio
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Now what if...
Would that database end up being a 'claim' of prior art repository?
The step after that is to automate the patent office out of existence....
A little lobbying here and there, and who knows....
and he who posts first wins....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Not only this
Open Collaboration Principles
Believe me, i am not payed by IBM ;-)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
too bad
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: too bad
CRLF
I would like to add my kudos as well. Cheers Big Blue, aka Khaki and Black
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
You all buy the BS?
Although patent law is in dire need of revamping, don't mistake IBM's motives. It's not about making the world a better place, it's about revenue.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You all buy the BS?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Much ado about little
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
You can turn it into capital if you put into practice draconian laws that turn any idea into a monopoly.
Innovation and practical applications of an idea represent the real capital.
An idea if not put into practice or harnessed and spread is worthless.
And innovation allows to be ahead of competition, IP laws as such see innovation as something stagnant or that goes ahead in jumps and bumps, this truly false. Innovation is a continuous process built on all of the amassed knowledge.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Another piece of BS from IBM
Patent applications (most of them) are already publushed at 18 month (years ahead of the actual grant)
JUst go to www.uspto.gov/patft to see for yourself.
Techdirt is dumb as usual
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment