Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   ?, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 2:12am

   
   

   If I were a private investigator, I'd be trying to get in good with the employees of that company, or I would be trying to get one of my own employees into that company.
   
   You could seriously make a lot of loot if this thing becomes popular.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Cool

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 2:24am

   
   

   I've joined and started filling out my little black book... with the names of all the women I want to have sex with. Sandy, very hot, natural blonde Lowes cashier, rendevous in the garden section in store number x, September 6 9:30 pm. Some day some nerdy little guy (moreso than me) will hack/crack/make his way into my account and I will become his god. He will create a website in my honor and list my exploits for the world to see. I'll best Wilt Chamberlain and other sports stars in number of encounters claimed. Soon I'll even come to believe I've actually slept with three(+) orders of magnitude more women than I have actually even spoken to in my life. I will die a God in my own mind then. Never mind that I am a fourty year old damn near virgin. Ahh, the wonders of the Internet.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re: Cool

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 5:17am

   
   

   LOL

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   time

   

   Missing, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 5:58am

   
   

   If you have the time to write all the lurid details of your exploits, they are probably fictional.. not that I think anything hacked from that site would be worth reading..... "man, I finally banged that cheerleader, Jenny last night. what a great ass!, sounded like a chipmunk when excited, white chicks are soooo easy.."

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Re: time

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 6:13am

   
   

   Cause nobody wants to sleep with De Colored girls

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Forget P.I.'s, how about 5-0?

   

   Stranger in the Night, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 6:16am

   
   

   I can see a database like this being used for far more nefarious purposes than a private investigator trying to cash in with cheated spouses and significant others. How about police combing the data for lines like, "So I hid in the bushes and waited for her to come out. To say the least I caught her by curprise, and the knife? That was the perfect tool for the job. She didn't say peep the entire time."
   
   Just a thought.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   AIDS

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 6:31am

   
   

   Great way to track who has AIDS.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   does the site automatically apply the rule of 3?

   

   chris (profile), Sep 6th, 2006 @ 6:43am

   
   

   if the person is a male, divide the number of claimed encounters by 3. if the person is female, multiply the number of claimed encounters by 3.
   
   for example:
   
   if a guy says he's done 12 girls in his life, it's actually 4.
   
   if a girl says she's had 4 partners, it's actually 12.
   
   so, wilt chamberlain only tagged 6667 women, which is obviously a much more reasonable figure.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Re: Re: time

   

   A Colored Girl, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 6:44am

   
   

   Unless of course, you look like Beyonce!!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    From the site...

    

    Helsturm, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 6:53am

    
    

    "In March of 2004, the ideas for simplifying the task of creating and maintaining a sex log was brought up in a conversation between programmers. One of the programmers jumped at the idea to create a web-based sex log for himself - to make it easier to update and record his sexual incounters."
    
    Yeah...because we all know that programmers have so much sex that they find it hard to keep track of.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Re: From the site...

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 7:24am

    
    

    Hey, if you only touch boobies once in your life, its good to be able to write down all the details to better remember it by.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    charlie potatoes, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 7:39am

    
    

    Those who can...Do...those who can't...Blog.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    Tag I'm IT!

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 9:12am

    
    

    Man, Oh Man, this came just in time for me. UPS is delivering 3 cases of Tag body spray tomorrow and I've hit every crooked online Pharmacy I could find to get multiple prescriptions for Viagra and Cialis. I'm gonna need the storage and reliability of an Internet Black Book to keep the names of all the honeys I'll be hooking up with!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14.  

    Re: AIDS

    

    suckerpunch-TM, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 10:54am

    
    

    Yes, everyone who has sex has AIDS. Stupid comment, sex negative loser.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15.  

    Re: does the site automatically apply the rule of

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 11:16am

    
    

    Chris,
    How does the rule of 3 work if I was once a Male, and am now Female, genitalia change and all.
    Truthfully, I can say I've had full sex with 9 females and 3 males in my life.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16.  

    Re: Re: AIDS

    

    Anonymous Coward, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 11:21am

    
    

    No, not every person who has sex has aids; but if you start with one person that you know got Aids at this time, and attempted to trace their exploits you could find a good amount of people they've exposed.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

17.  

    Re: Re: does the site automatically apply the rule

    

    Normal, Sep 6th, 2006 @ 2:00pm

    
    

    You take the total number of sex changes you've had (in your case 2), then multiply by the total number of sexual encounters you've had (12*2=24). Then you divide by the number of sex changes you should have had (0), which gives an error since you divided by zero. So, the simple math shows that you are indeed a freak.
    
    Sorry for the ignorance/intolerance/etc

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

18.  

    good site!!!

    

    jackd, Jun 3rd, 2009 @ 9:20pm

    
    

    Plastic products made by injection molding services with low costs and supeior quality Shoring scaffolding for construction is a very useful tool. Books printed by China printing is very good quality and good prices.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

19.  

    

    China Tent, Oct 9th, 2010 @ 12:52am

    
    

    Ha, that’s actually a really good suggestion. Thanks so much for this!
    
    　　This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment