Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  Oliver Wendell Jones, Aug 31st, 2006 @ 9:14pm

  
  

  Patent Filing

  I'm calling a patent attorney tomorrow and asking him to start paper work on "Method for creating a database of all obvious ideas *on the internet*" and "Method for creating a database of all obvious ideas *on a wireless network*".
  
  Let's see now, what recent *tack on to an existing idea* suffixes have I forgotten? How about "Method for creating a database of all obvious ideas *using Google.com*" and "Method for creating a database of all obvious ideas *using MySpace.com*".
  
  If someone else wants to file for "Method for creating a database of all obvious ideas *using YouTube*" I'll let you have that one - because that one is *just silly*...
  
  If only I could come up with a way to work in either Apple or iPod that would be sweet...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Daniel Bjorndahl, Aug 31st, 2006 @ 10:43pm

  
  

  Yep.

  Makes sense to me. Kudos to Mike.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Tom, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 12:06am

  
  

  Method for making a light-emitting glass device materialize one foot above the user's head to act as a metaphorical representation of an idea.... *on the internet*... *with a self-contained force feedback occilator*!!!!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 12:33am

  
  

  Getting lazy?

  That sounds like a wager to me Mike... you think i can't make said database? how about the title of this article read "You Shouldn't Create A Database Of All Obvious Ideas"

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Andyware, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 12:49am

  
  

  Getting lazy? Huh, what he said is it's impossible to ceate a database of all obvious ideas, it's an almost infinite list. Kudos Mike, yet another good read.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 1:21am

  
  

  Re:

  I disagree... you could hypthetically create a database that's essentially a brute force compilation of every possible word combination with a relativly high ranged arbitrary cutoff point for number of words and then use some fuzzy logic to seperate ideas from non-ideas and to further classify ideas into obvious and not-so-obvious :P
  
  or you could get philosophical and debate endlessly as to what constitutes "obvious" until you've worked all your ideas into the obvious category...
  
  i prefer plan a.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 1:41am

  
  

  oh, and you could also argue that infinite is an intangible material concept... outside of the abstract realm nothing is infinite... it's nice how you changed the wording to "almost infinite" andyware as opposed to mike's "basically infinite"... it's a good article, i just nitpick things ... :P

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  kuronoir, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 3:38am

  
  

  platform

  Since a large number of technology related people are here, lets go ahead and start the religious platform war now..
  
  Should the database be SQL Server or Oracle?
  
  (for the non techs out here that will keep them busy for the rest of the thread and we can go ahead and make the database on something like the free google database or something)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Andy Armstrong, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 4:45am

  
  

  I'll bite :)

  I guess this might possibly be a criticism of Bleeding Obvious ? :) The flavour of ideas I'm aiming to capture is "that seems like a neat idea - but surely it's not worth patenting". Obviously (heh) it's impossible to capture all the obvious ideas - idea space is effectively infinite. I do, however, think there's a category of ideas that, while certainly good ideas, seem obvious as soon as the thinker has thought them. That's the category I'm interested in. Think of it as an alternative patent system for things that are good enough to write down but too much effort to patent.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Neal, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 7:37am

  
  

  Me and my monkeys

  I go one better and claim that my infinite number of monkeys can put every idea on paper given a reasonable amount of time typing. Since a collection of otherwise dumb monkeys can not only write down the ideas, but do so in full legalese for a patent application, I suggest only one possible conclusion. There are no ideas worthy of patents. The patent office should be immediately closed and all patent lawyers should be forced into endentured servitude shuffling the reams of waste paper my monkeys produce.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Monarch, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 8:32am

  
  

  Yeah, an earlier article shows this very clearly. Who would have ever thought of conjugating verbs for an obvious database?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 11:14am

  
  

  Re: Andy

  wrong... "idea space" (whatever you assume that to be) is not infinite... infinite doesn't exist... thought is a function over time... time is not infinite... see where the problem lies?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Joe Smith, Sep 1st, 2006 @ 11:47am

  
  

  obviousness

  It may not be sensible to create a database where the techies try to input every idea they ever had. It could be possible to create a database containing large numbers of abandoned development projects, graduate engineering theses, undergraduate term papers etc. as a large, searchable and publicly accessible body of work.
  
  One of the purposes of such a database would be to allow employers to look for students and researchers who were familiar with the particular area the employer was interested in.
  
  Remember that Federal Express started as a term paper.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  yossi, Sep 3rd, 2006 @ 3:37am

  
  

  it already exists

  its called the us patent office

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment