RSS
Twitter
Why Should EchoStar Wait For Patent Review When TiVo Doesn't Have To?
from the fairness? dept
In the ongoing battle over patents concerning DVR technology, both EchoStar and TiVo are suing each other, claiming the other company infringes on its patents. As was all over the news recently, TiVo won the first round, convincing a judge to tell EchoStar it needed to turn off its DVRs (a decision since stayed by the appeals court). However, a judge looking at the patent suit in the other direction has now told EchoStar it needs to wait until the Patent Office has reviewed the patent in question. This actually makes a lot of sense, and we all know at least one company that would still have over $600 million it was forced to give away if other judges followed similar rules. However, it seems a bit unfair that TiVo's case continued to move forward without USPTO review, while EchoStar needs to wait. It only seems fair to treat both cases the same. As it stands now, TiVo is in a much better bargaining position -- it's won its first case, and EchoStar has to wait before its own case will be reviewed. While it makes sense to allow USPTO review, shouldn't the courts follow the same rules in dealing with these types of cases?
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
apples to oranges?
I don't know for sure but in both cases the decision for or against seemed to have a lot to do with the quality of the evidence and arguments made to the respective judges, much as it should be. It seems a little silly with to say they should be treated the same with out going into the particulars. In Tivo's case they had strong evidence, though I don't know it to be true the reverse can be assumed based on how the courts did things, for echo star... With out the details it sounds pretty arbitrary but I doubt that is truly the case.
At the end of the day we are actualy served better by s system that consideres each argument and the sum of precedence rather then trying to allways make a squard fit a circle for sameness, just IMHO
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
All Is Fair In Love And TiVo
Hey Mike,
I think you got this one wrong. TiVo has already undergone the patent review case and had many of their infringement claims thrown out. I'm not an attorney, but my understanding is that this part of why they didn't get more in treble damages from the judge. After the review of 61 patents, I believe that two of the eight pertaining to the Echostar case ended up surviving the review. TiVo can still go back and argue for the other six, but the two that survived were related to the media switch and are why Echostar is forced to disable their current PVRs, but are able to build a work around if they don't include the media switch in their DVR.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: All Is Fair In Love And TiVo
Davis,
You'll note that the patent review went on concurrently with the lawsuit, and that the lawsuit was decided before the patent rulings. That's different from the case above, where the judge is saying the case won't go ahead until after the patent office has reviewed Echostar's patents.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Seems Tivo has...
Seems Tivo has the upper hand.
They know exactly what they are doing. They are trying to get the upper hand in order to pave their way for victory.
If they make the first move, they are favored in the eyes of the law and that's exactly what has happened so far.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Tivo Sucks
TIVO Sucks. If you buy one you are part of the problem.
Ultimate TV RULES! Too bad you can't buy them anymore.
Seriously, Tivo is a mediocre DVR and the company is just screwing everyone over including the customers. They are the cable company / Teleco of DVRs.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment