Instant Messaging Still Not Ruining Kids' Grammar

from the again? dept

A few years ago, teachers and parents started worrying that "txt speak" from IM and SMS text messages was contributing to the downfall of the language, as kids would mix in txting shortcuts into school papers and such. However, study after study has shown this to be false. In 2003, a study showed all this use of text messaging helped make kids feel more comfortable with writing. In 2004, a study found that most kids were smart enough to understand the differences in writing formally and writing text messages to friends. In 2005, research showed that kids today are actually better writers than in the past ("using far more complex sentence structures, a wider vocabulary and a more accurate use of capital letters, punctuation and spelling"), even if they allowed the occasional txting shortcut into their papers. So, we're past the halfway mark in 2006 -- it's about time someone came out with this year's report saying the exact same thing. Thanks to Slashdot, we find out that it's the University of Toronto, whose researchers apparently decided the past studies weren't enough and did their own, showing no ill effects on writing from all that text messaging. So, now we have four years worth of studies, all saying the same thing. Can we finally put to bed the idea that text messaging is bad for kids' writing skills?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Techguy83, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 8:51pm

    maybe

    maybe teachers will finally look at this and understand that txting and such is not destroying our youth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    The Teenager, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:08pm

    OMGWTFBBQ

    It is not hurting their ability to spell, punctuate, capitalize ect., but rather, it is lowering expectations for writing. Then txt-ing there is no chastisement, to consequences for using incorrect grammar, so they get used to having not expectations. Most of my friends, and yes, i am a teenager, can't puntuate for their lives and usually don't spell things correctly or capitalize correctly even when they are doing papers, ect. because: A. They don't know how because they never have; and B. They feel no need to, because the lack of any desire for writing correctly has escaped them for thier entire lives. I don't ever remember being taught any grammar in elementary school, and you don't learn to spell, but rather are tested on wether or not you are a born "speller."

    So it's true that it's not text messagings fault for starting it, but text messaging kind of keeps in going. It keeps kids writing all year with not expectations except the expectations that anyone should understand what your writing, or they're not worth writing to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      sean, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:32pm

      Re: OMGWTFBBQ

      you're

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      The Twenty-Something, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 5:33am

      Re: OMGWTFBBQ

      Hey, don't make excuses. You can’t spell, punctuate, or capitalize because YOU don’t care to. You may not think there are expectations of you, but there are. I used to be a horrible speller and punctuator (I could always capitalize, how do you screw that up?) until Instant Messaging hit when I was in my teens. Then I started reading books and newspapers which really helped with punctuation. So put down your phone, get onto some of your favorite websites, and actually pay attention to what’s written.

      By the way, that was a pretty well written entry. I guess you feel that Techdirt has some high expectations for you.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    bluesubno.6, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:10pm

    no wai

    Heaven forbid us children take a shortcut to type something quickly to our friends. Lol isn't ruining grammar.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      ConceptJunkie (profile), Aug 1st, 2006 @ 7:29am

      Re: no wai

      Yeah, it was ruined already. Take a look at the average post on /. or digg and it's embarrassing that these folks are past the fourth grades (and I'm not talking ESL either).

      I IM with my 10-year-old on occasion and he is a decent typer and communicates quite well because of it. His spelling and grammar could use some improvement, but that has nothing to do with IM. We used to chat on the Vax back in the mid 80's and developed what we called "Hakspeek", which was just the same kind of stuff everyone does now. 20 years later, I am a proficient enough typist to avoid that stuff.

      The real problem is that people don't _read_ anymore, which is why you will see so many words spelled fo-net-tik-lee. It's obvious the person hasn't seen the word in writing. I watch plenty of TV and spend time on the Web, and don't consider myself a huge reader (2-3 books a month, some serious, some fluff), but apparently I'm wrong given that recent piece about how many folks never crack a book after high school or college.

      That's the real problem. People think reading digg.com or even TechDirt is the equivalent of reading a good book. Far from it... this stuff is brain candy, even if some useful discussions are spurred from it. I don't think the Internet has caused this problem although it is probably contributing to it. Given how many grammar and spelling problems you see in magazines and newspapers, and my favorite example, local news broadcasts, there seems to be a diminishing standard of correctness... and when you get on the Web, the idea of "editor" even among "reputable" newspaper and magazine sites, etc, seems to be virtually non-existent.

      IM isn't any worse than the slang any kid uses in any period of history ("Dude, Aristarchus is such a bonehead.") As long as he knows what's slang and what's proper, there's no problem.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MusicMan1, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:10pm

    Brilliance

    The initial 'this is ruining our children's lives' was hype anyway. Kids know much more about computers by simply sitting down infront of the thing for a few hours, than their parents that pay for classes for a semester. I never truely saw the connection anyway, I know i dont spell well, there may be several mistakes in this comment. But it has nothing to do with instant messaging.

    If children cant understand the difference between 'see you later' and 'c y4 l8r' they really arn't at a level of comprehention and literacy to be judged as a deciding body to compare instant messaging/texting to the general student population.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Danno, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:22pm

    Ahh yes, but imagine how incredibly the composition skills of children would be if they were spending all that time texting writing real sentences with real words instead of shortened acronyms and pidgin.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      ConceptJunkie (profile), Aug 1st, 2006 @ 7:47am

      Re:

      We use IM extensively here at work, and the slang is pretty heavily used (YT? BRB, etc). There's nothing wrong with that, but since I can type well enough, I don't do that as I think it is more professional to communicate in complete sentences even in a medium as ephemeral as IM... and absolutely when it comes to e-mail. Most people communicate just fine around here (we're all adults and professionals), but I think it's worthwhile to maintain a higher standard.

      Ultimately, however, you can't do that unless you are properly educated, and that requires much work above and beyond regular schooling. Many schools do a lousy job of teaching the basics... it's more important to be able to put a condom on a banana than to be able to write a coherent paragraph, but even the good schools can't replace an environment where reading is encouraged and practiced. My wife and I read all the time, but it's still a lot of work to try to get our kids to read... TV and electronics are a huge distraction, but once we pull the power plug and after a couple minutes of griping, the kids will gladly switch over to other activities, including pulling out a book, or (Heaven Forfend!) going outside and getting some exercise.

      I have nothing against TV and video games and other trappings of our time (I grew up in front of the tube and turned out OK), as long as they are moderated with more productive activities. The best thing parents can do is set a good example.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Clibby, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:27pm

    But what about...

    Its not the text messaging that is ruining our grammer and spelling; its the fact that we all use computers to write everything and now rely on spell and grammer checkers. I know this not because of others, but because I've realized this myself. I had to turn off the spell and grammer checkers on my computer to help with the problem and use it as a last resort, not because my papers written at home were bad, but my in-class writing was always flawed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:35pm

    My contacts must be abberations

    If kids aren't getting dumber, and I don't care if it's because of internet pagers or not, then why do I have contacts on my list who can't write a sentence to save their own lives? I mean it: if they fell down a well, and they needed to convey something intelligently to rescue personnel in order to not die, I'd start picking out a suit; I know how it'd end.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Ali, Oct 3rd, 2010 @ 5:44am

      Re: My contacts must be abberations

      Those people have always been around. Now some of them are your contacts.
      This media has just given people who aren't strong in - or don't care about - grammar, punctuation, etc a place to be lazy and get away with it. In the past, those people learned enough English to fill out the forms and get by - and I know plenty of them who lead normal over-35-y-o lives avoiding as many literary activities as possible. :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Matt, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 9:35pm

    Was I the only one that noticed?

    A few years ago, teachers and parents started working that "txt speak" from IM and SMS text messages was contributing to the downfall of the language, as kids would mix in txting shortcuts into school papers and such. Started working?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Joshua, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:06pm

    It's not txt messaging...

    When I was in elementary school (grades k-5) we were taught the alphabet, phonics, how to spell common words by rote, basic grammar (subjects, predicates, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, nouns, and pronouns), how to write a five paragraph report, and cursive writing (which I have never used outside of fourth and fifth grade for anything other than my signature). Middle school and high school English focused on expanding my knowledge of the names of the different types of structures in a sentence, making me read boring books (seriously... Utopia?), and teaching me how to write better five paragraph reports.

    I don't ever remember a single lesson on how to structure a sentence ("don't end a sentence on a predicate" doesn't count). Nor do I remember a course on sentence flow and readability. I had to learn that by reading books.And the only reason I read regularly is because my parents are avid readers. The books they assigned at school sure didn't inspire me to go out and discover more to read.

    The only reason I can spell with the proficiency I can now is that I took an intrest in word origins (which is how I am told spelling bee competitors do it). Rote learning just can't cover it all.

    The point I am getting at is that instead of complaining that kids don't use propper grammar, maybe we should be teaching them why grammar is important and more importantly *how to use it*.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Xcetron, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:20pm

    uh oh, it probably did not help that I once turned in an english essay that was typed in "leetspeak". It was funny though.


    And IMing help kids improve their spellings somewhat.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    s12, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:22pm

    grammar nazi

    there's no teacher like the forum grammar nazi!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Justin Johnson, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:37pm

    No way...

    "A few years ago, teachers and parents started worrying that "txt speak" from IM and SMS text messages was contributing to the downfall of the language, as kids would mix in txting shortcuts into school papers and such. However, study after study has shown this to be false."

    Hogwash. Complete hogwash.

    I've proofread papers that have those shortcuts in them. "Study after study" is flawed. When you're handing something in to your teacher, substiuting u for you and cuz for because is... bloody ridiculous and subconscious as every kid says they didn't know that they did it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Jeff, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:44pm

      Re: No way...

      wtf?! y r u ir8? u r a s o!!!!! pc n gd wl & stfu!!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike (profile), Jul 31st, 2006 @ 11:15pm

      Re: No way...

      I've proofread papers that have those shortcuts in them. "Study after study" is flawed.

      No one was saying that this NEVER happens. The point is that it's not necessarily the text messaging that's the problem. Either way, I would tend to trust academic research on the topic, rather than a single anecdote...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jeff, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:40pm

    Re:

    The problem with studies about kids who are texting is that it always assumes that the variable factor is text messaging, and not something more prevalent, like amphetamines, Spongebob Squarepants episodes, or other mind-altering products.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Beckie M, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 10:52pm

    forum grammar nazi's

    there are so many chat's and forums where people will point out every little your and you're mix up. You feel stupid being the one constantly corrected and you are darn sure not to make that same mistake again.

    I have people proof read fic's Iwrite and I've learned more from them reminding me the proper use of "then and than" then my english teacher ever did. I took advanced english classes and I have to agree w/ the guy who said schools didn't teach me HOW to structure a sentance so it was readable, I had to write in order to learn that. IMing all the time is a great way to learn how to write what you mean, there's no inflections in ones voice, you don't get to say "you know what i'm saying right?" all the time because NO, we DON'T know what you're saying. I've learned to more accurately learn to express my meaning tactfully throught txt and IM then by any english lesson

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Code_ex, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 11:36pm

      Re: forum grammar nazi's

      "I have people proof read fic's Iwrite and I've learned more from them reminding me the proper use of "then and than" then my english teacher ever did."

      "fic's" ??
      "Iwrite" ??
      "then my english teacher" ?? (then what???)

      Looks like you really did learn somethng didn't you? Maybe people around here should check their own spelling and grammar when commenting.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Just Me :D, May 13th, 2008 @ 9:26pm

        Re: Re: forum grammar nazi's

        Did you know it's very bad grammar to use two question marks? Haha :) This forum is kinda funny. There are grammar corrections replies everywhere! (Yes, I know kinda is not a real word...) You can correct this grammar all you want! To tell you the truth, I won't care in the slightest!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 31st, 2006 @ 11:55pm

    The most obvious thing that the OP and the studies aren't looking at is the heavy use of "spellcheck" and "grammarcheck" by kids these days. I would love - LOVE - to read their papers without the aid of these crutches. I dont buy for one second that kids arent idiots these days, because I get to read their writing all the time. Just go read letters that Civil War soldiers wrote home to their families, and compare it to what kids write today. You'll shake your head with consternation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Annoyed, May 13th, 2008 @ 9:37pm

      Re:

      I am a high school senior. I have taken three college English classes this year. I also text a lot. I have never put any texting lingo in my papers. I know how to write. Stop lumping all "kids" into one group. There are many exceptions to your rule. Even if most of us rely on spell check, you will really make the ones that don't angry. I doubt you would get anyone on your side that way except the people that are already on your side (which would make your comment pointless).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    A chicken passeth by, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 12:07am

    They are forgetting something.

    Perhaps the linguists don't realize that a long time ago, SMS's (the first IM) were charged BY MESSAGE LENGTH.

    txtmsg wz inv. 2 keep $s dn. (and make messaging on the phone less of a chore before the T9 dictionary was invented... I still haven't mastered one finger SMS no jutsu.)

    Naturally, the entire phenomenon was ported wholesale to PC IMing, where it is now used since it's much faster to type like that.

    Pompous professors simply have no imagination whatsoever...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    shableep, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 1:06am

    What's everyone flipping out about?

    My grammar wouldn't be what it is today if I had never communicated on the internet.

    If anything, the internet was always a place for me to practice newly learned grammar concepts while growing up. If you have a kid that is prone to bad grammar, he's going to have bad grammar regardless of what's of how it's displayed.

    One kid might not know how to structure a sentence properly and make up most of the grammar. That same kid with messaging experience would refer to using his texting expertise as a place holder of his lacking grammar knowledge.

    We're all way too quick to point the finger.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      LMAO, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 5:03am

      Re: What's everyone flipping out about?

      My grammar wouldn't be what it is today if I had never communicated on the internet. If you have a kid that is prone to bad grammar, he's going to have bad grammar regardless of what's of how it's displayed.

      my ribs is hurtin

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    David, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 2:59am

    Grew up with AIM

    I basically grew up with IM software starting at about 10th grade when ICQ first came out, and all my friends write beautiful english.

    I think ICQ really improved my writing, as it wasn't instantaneous.. more of a text messaging kind of thing. AIM at first seemed a bit too quick for me.

    But as time went by, my friends and I learned to adapt, and I think we can differentiate between AIM and what we write at the office, schools, and email.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    The Twenty-Something, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 5:41am

    What treachery is this?

    What language do ye speakith with. Mine ears are poisoned with the speech of modern day! If only I could escape this purgatory…

    It’s the EVOLUTION of language. If today’s children are being more efficient with their writing and EVERYONE understands what they are saying, then it’s still functioning (better than before) as effective communication. Everyone needs to let go of these rigid notions of what everything is supposed to be and accept what it’s becoming. Those who try to hold back progression will only be left behind. You can quote me on that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Slayer, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 6:42am

    It is not the writing.

    It is not the writing that gets affected its the typing. Typing is largely based on memorization. Abandoning the learned method to abbreviate just about damn near everything give way to the possibility that those abbreviations will make it into "proper" text based documents. Now its true, with the beauty of the ever evolving word processing programs, that these things are caught but at what expense to time and efficiency. Not to mention when you move into the corporate (or even not so corporate) world and a typo or "txt speak" dropped in an e-mail could define you possibilty for promotion within a company. No it isn't the writing, it is the typing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    l337sp34x0r, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 7:10am

    rofl my waffles...

    ok, eye'm a 2o sumthin yeyer old whose yoused a cumpewtor sense he wuz 9 oar 1o, now eye aks ewe a kwestchun, wut's rong with meye speling and meye gramar? peepol need too grow sum since!!! 4t l34s+ I d1dn'+ wr1+3 l1k3 +h15!!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    chris (profile), Aug 1st, 2006 @ 7:22am

    coding will ruin your writing skills

    i refuse to use capitals when i write because of all the time i have wasted thanks to case sensitivity.

    spelling and capitalization are not that important if you use a decent word processor to write important documents.

    as any coder will tell you, it's not important to spell correctly, just consistently.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Code_ex, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 8:47pm

      Re: coding will ruin your writing skills

      I am a coder, I have been for over 12 years, and I'm here to tell you that you are absolutely FULL of S**T. Any INTELLIGENT coder will tell you it is important to spell correcly AND consistently.
      I would LOATH to see your work, especially since you obviously prefer to let software do it for you, you aren't a coder, you are a pathetic script kiddy!!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Aug 4th, 2006 @ 11:27am

        Re: Re: coding will ruin your writing skills

        you are a pathetic script kiddy!!!! i'll have you know that i happen to be an exceptional script kiddy.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Feynman, Aug 1st, 2006 @ 5:31pm

    Re: Re:

    To ConceptJunkie
    "Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking"
    -Albert Einstein

    This doesn't excuse schools from inadequate teaching. Quite the contrary, schools should be required to teach children grammar in several different languages with different origins and different grammatical structures (i.e. english, spanish, japanese). However, I'm concerned about you. Why aren't you following your creative pursuits? I think a better impression would be set on your children if you were in the pursuit of invention or formulation of theories than sitting on your ass reading about other peoples ideas without any of your own...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Kamran, Aug 7th, 2006 @ 8:06am

    Coding?

    How would coding ruin writing skills? I always code using VS.NET and I'd say the opposite. The constant nagging with formatting statements and functions... especially when you're writing a long program, making sure your functions and routines are all the same convention.

    Anyway, when I was in elementary school, we had typing classes, english, and everything. I don't remember a thing from the English classes... I've always read, I still read, and years in high school was spent doing Latin because I wanted to learn grammar and sentence structure... I learned more in my Latin class than English ever taught me.

    I'm a naturally good at spelling, too.

    This whole business of TXTing killing children has some merit, I think, in some cases... in IM, I don't spend a lot of time writing punctuated and capitalized sentences but otherwise stay true to the conventions. I will type properly the first time I meet someone, because I think the first impression counts more. To me, if you type properly when you first meet me, I'll know you can do it and if you stop after that, I won't care.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jess S., Aug 18th, 2006 @ 8:25pm

    Kids and grammar

    I do not think it is slang on sms's or anything like that if you want good vocabulary for kids get them to read a book and I agree with the research slang is an every day thing everyone isn't perfect sheesh!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 3rd, 2006 @ 7:53am

    hey google

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    King Bitch, Nov 6th, 2006 @ 7:48pm

    At our school it is compulsory to have a laptop in year 9, i asked my class of 25 students if they considered themselves good writers of acceptional spelling and grammar. 60% admitted no. Without a doubt this is because students are becoming too dependent of spell check on our word documents and are rarely challenged on our writing abilities.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    King James, Nov 6th, 2006 @ 7:59pm

    i recon your a premature peice of shit thats got nothing better to do with your life.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Admin Pick, Nov 26th, 2006 @ 3:05pm

    I think it does ruin Kid's grammar, at least for my Kids!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anthony, Dec 3rd, 2006 @ 11:54am

    Seeking Help

    I am a journalist at Lowell High School in San Francisco and I was wondering if I could interview you about this blog because I am writing an article about this similar topic.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Vonna, Jun 19th, 2007 @ 10:58pm

    Its destroying

    the only reason i say IM is derying because i don't get the IM now if they had a webpage and to teach children and also adult how to use and do IM and then i will change my mind and it will might be easier to our youth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    kris, Jan 21st, 2008 @ 7:51pm

    um no

    i have been IMing since I was in like 2nd grade (I'm now in 11th) and I text constantly but i am a grammatical freak and I rarely spell things wrong. It's a totally different aspect of spelling when you think of texting and talking/writing papers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Shawn, Apr 9th, 2009 @ 10:17am

    lesbos

    I think that all of the lesbians and gay people are a violation of god

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    mendjaya, Dec 25th, 2009 @ 5:22am

    grammar

    I do not think it is slang on sms's or anything like that if you want good vocabulary for kids get them to read a book and I agree with the research slang is an every day thing everyone isn't perfect sheesh!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This